Jump to content

Why were/are masts and spars tapered?


achuck49

Recommended Posts

Can someone explain to me why masts and spars were/are tapered in the first place?  Couldn't a builder just find a piece of wood that was the correct diameter and use that instead of going through the expense and trouble of tapering that same piece?

 

Just an idle question that keeps rattling around in my head.

 

Chuck Aldrich

Chuck A.

 

If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you even tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weight and because of that weight and the deflection forces diminishing as you go out from the center allowed for reducing the weight without hurting function. Or could be like Grandad, he liked to stand on the sunny side of the barn out of the wind and whittle a tooth pick from a much bigger piece.

jud

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two reasons really. First, the natural tree trunk had some taper but, more importantly, weight. According to R. C. Anderson, as the length of masts and yards increased, there was a need to keep the center of mass lower and along the centerline of the ship. By tapering, the strength was retained but the total mass/weight was reduced and kept lower (masts) and centered (yards). Resulted in greater stability.

Wayne

Neither should a ship rely on one small anchor, nor should life rest on a single hope.
Epictetus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the question is not just about weight. As Jud says, just think about the distribution of a force acting laterally on the mast. It acts just like one arm of a bow or more precisely like a cantilever with one end free and the other anchored securely on the deck. See:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantilever

 

Without goind too deep into structural analysis, the point is that the stress accumulates at the bottom of the mast, so the mast has to be thicker there to withstand the stress.

 

If instead of being tapered, it would have been straight, that would mean it would surely break at the foot because the ratio between its strength and the forces applied to it would have been the worst at this point. 

 

Now think again of one arm of the Archer's bow: it is also tapered from the tip to the middle for the same reason: to have a constant ratio between its strength and the forces applied to it, otherwise any irregularity would mean it would surely break under stress. 

 

Hope this helps!

Edited by Doreltomin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff. The mechanics and dynamics factors are probably unintended benefits, since the vast majority of early shipwrights that developed the concept of tapering had little or no training in mechanics and often very little math. Worth a look at Anderson's books on Rigging in the days of the sprit sail topmost for his historical analysis.

Wayne

Neither should a ship rely on one small anchor, nor should life rest on a single hope.
Epictetus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought to wonder why--glad you asked the question! 

Tom

 

 

Current: Sergal Sovereign of the Seas

Previous builds:  AL Swift, AL King of the Mississippi, Mamoli Roter Lowe, Amati Chinese Junk, Caesar, Mamoli USS Constitution, Mantua HMS Victory, Panart San Felipe, Mantua Sergal Soleil Royal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...