Jump to content

Hubac's Historian

Members
  • Content Count

    968
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hubac's Historian

  1. Thank you for that link, Heinrich! The discussion of the gammoning was a little hard to follow because Google Translate does less well with German, than say, French. As far as the Heller kit is concerned, I think that it would be perfectly sufficient to raise the load waterline a solid 1/4”, so that it stands within 5 scale feet of the lowest gun port. This will improve the proportions of the lower hull, while still remaining safely clear of the gammoning. You can, of course, take your conversion project to whatever extremes you wish, but I think it may ultimately be less frustrating/more satisfying to accept certain constraints of the kit architecture. To, in other words, build a more impressionistic model of the SP, as opposed to a rigorously accurate one. With Cedric’s conversion to La Reyne, for example, it is his intention to correct the sheer of the decks/run of the guns, the layout and number of guns, as well as the forward sheer of the wales. All of this will necessitate some tricky reconstruction, at the main deck level, with a complete scratch build of the upper bulwarks - not to mention, a total reconstruction of the head. This last bit would be necessary, in any approach, because the structure and arrangement of the head knees and rails on La Reyne of 1672 is totally different from SR or SP in 1689-1693. All of this is not strictly impossible, but it is certainly a very challenging project. I, for one, am fascinated to see whether he follows through on some or all of that bacause doing so will almost surely introduce a number of ingenious solutions and techniques to bring those changes to fruition. Even if he were not to go to those extremes, however, I do believe it is absolutely possible to build a good impressionistic model of La Reyne with the Heller kit. I was, as a side note, really amazed with the German forum builder who converted the Heller Victory into the Commerce de Marseilles. I’m not a student of the Trafalgar era, but that looked mighty convincing to my eyes! In the end, the project has to remain fun, in order to sustain your interest and get to the finish line. I wish the best for you and your model, and I’ll be watching every step of the process.
  2. An interesting observation about the joint lines of the cutwater; when I get to that part, I might just fill the stock joint lines with putty; sand the whole surface level; and, finally, scribe in new interlocking joint lines that more appropriately follow the shape of the cutwater. It’s just one of those things about the Heller kit that doesn’t jump out as completely wrong until you really look at it. Good catch! I still don’t think the gammoning should be submerged, though. Heinrich, can you please post a link to your German forum? I’d like to read the discussion, there.
  3. Hello Heinrich, Well, you have many interesting ideas and techniques to test out; your scrap hull should be an excellent testing ground for your experiments. With regard to the hawser insert piece, it always annoyed me that it doesn’t fair smoothly into the rest of the hull - even though the plank lines align, as though the planking strakes are continuous. And they would be in full-scale. For my model, I took a little extra time to scribe a rebate into the aft edge of the hawser insert, as well as a diminishing to nothing rebate into the top and bottom edges from aft to forward, so that the hawser insert would flow smoothly into the rest of the hull. This is time well spent, as the visible step that remains from a “stock” assembly only contributes to the plastic-y feel of the finished model; like a hugely exaggerated flash line.
  4. Thanks, Mark! The name started out as a bit of alliterative fun, but 26 pages later it has sort of become true. Thank you for taking the time to read through all of my tangents.
  5. Hey Mark! No apologies are necessary; you are getting in on the lower deck, so to speak, as far as the actual build is concerned. I’m glad to see you here, and I hope the project will remain interesting to you, as it evolves. I’m in Brooklyn, now, and still settling in, so there hasn’t been any ship work, as yet. We have a club meeting next week, though, and I’ll be picking her up then, if not sooner. Thank you to all for your likes, comments and looking in!
  6. Interesting build, and very nicely done! I will follow along, if you don’t mind.
  7. It really is amazing, EJ, how the ship has come together. You are doing an incredible job!
  8. Well, that will be a very interesting project, indeed! Later, when I have a minute, I will write a bit, in the “carving techniques” thread, about my personal approach to scale carving - which is quite new to me, but I have found it to be as effective as carving in full-size.
  9. Okay, so I replied to your post in carving techniques. Is it your intention to upgrade this kit by making the carvings from scratch?
  10. Hello Joachim, The Realle is certainly an interesting subject, and as you say, quite a challenging one from the carving perspective. My presumption, here, is that you are building a model from scratch, and not the Heller or any other kit. My first piece of advice would be to obtain or draw good plans that show a clear layout of the ornamental work, such that the carving is in scale, and proportionally consistent with the carving style and norms of 17th C. France. If the layout isn’t good, to begin with, the finished carvings will reflect that. Fortunately, original gilded and carved works from a French Realle still exist at the Musee de la Marine in Paris, I believe, although the following images are tagged Rochefort. This is as good a primary source as one could hope for in attempting to capture the exuberance and the artistry of the French Baroque era: That would be my starting point suggestion for such an involved project as this. I certainly look forward to your build log and will happily follow along, once youhave begun.
  11. I’m sorry to hear that you’re having a rough time, Mark. I hope you’ll be able to find your way again, soon, and we will be here when you do.
  12. This is one of the things about the SP monographie that does not add up for me. Although I do not have access to it, at the moment, I think that Lemineur references his waterline from an original draft that is of the same class of ship as the SP - the Tonnant class, if I remember [not sure about that]. Necessarily, though, his hull is a composite of a number of closely related sources - chiefly among them a slightly smaller class of ship that was, in many respects very similar, and better documented. I’m not sure how one would reconcile this problem, if they were using the plans to scratch-build the SP, in wood. Fortunately, with the Heller kit, the gammoning does not dip below the water line - not even if you raise the waterline to improve the apparent depth of the hull.
  13. Really well done Dan! It was a treat to see her, with all the progress you have made, the other day. I look forward to your next update.
  14. You know who might have a clear and practical answer to this question? Henry - AKA Popeye2Sea. He serves aboard the U.S.S. Constitution, and has a tremendous working knowledge of rigging, and of gun rigging. Maybe send him a message.
  15. Got it! Well, it certainly warrants some experimentation on my paint samples. This pastel route may also be the way to achieve the streaky algea look that I want for the thin strip of white stuff, at the waterline.
  16. Well, Druxey, that is a very good question. The actual number I settled on is somewhat arbitrary, but I based my decision to include more, rather than less, on my observation of various Van de Velde drawings, as well as the models of Herbert Tomesan; those models are very close studies of VDV drawings. Then, there are re-constructions, like Batavia, that have four scuppers along the lower deck. I see your point, though, about the weather deck - where it would make more practical sense to have more than less. In fact, the monographie models of Le Saint Philippe, show fewer along the lower deck. Perhaps, on future models, it would be more accurate to show fewer scuppers, here.
  17. I’ve been thinking about dry pastels/powders because I want to simulate the water staining beneath the scuppers, and maybe also run-off from the channels. Do you have any advice here about particular products, application techniques and sealing?
  18. FYI - I’m working right now, and decided to test a crease where the wale joins the hull. There was some accumulation of VDB in that crease, so I pressed hard with a Q-tip, and it didn’t pick up any VDB paint residue. Maybe the Windsor and Newton has more/better driers in it? I don’t know, but it seems to have cured.
  19. Hi Kirill, Yes, I’ve been using Windsor and Newton’s Van Dyke Brown oil paint for artists. This is part of Herbert Tomesan’s weathering protocol, in which he advises to brush it on heavy like shoe-pollish, and then wipe away as much as possible. Really, the paint effectively stains the underlying acrylic, and there is very little paint left on the surface. Now, yes, in the planking seams there will be a heavier accumulation, and this may take relatively longer to cure. But the wiped and burnished (with a coarse chip brush) surface is not at all tacky; you can handle it without leaving prints, etc. When I met Herbert in 2003, he showed me the models he was making for the Texel Roads diorama; his results were astounding. I felt like Gulliver holding these perfectly crafted plastic ship models that looked like real weathered wood. The process is so simple that I was skeptical that it would work, and yet, with very little effort it yields a surface with great depth and character. I think one could create even more depth with a somewhat streaky application of two different but complimentary brown acrylics, before applying the VDB. For my purposes though - SR’s deadworks would have been painted with this ventre-de-biche color - this is perfectly satisfactory. I’m probably overdoing it a little, but I like it. I had thought about using a fixative top coat, but I don’t want to lose the surface sheen that I have achieved. Given enough time, the paint will cure fully on its own. Because I can handle it without any problems, I’m not too concerned about it. In fact, a topcoat before the paint has fully cured might cause other problems. I think that once I have blacked over the wales and the boot-topping, I will brush over them with acrylic dullcoat because the acrylic is a little too shiny for these details. Other than that, though, time is your friend.
  20. Weathering and distress effects coming to life: The scratch pattern is more regular and subtle than my paint samples. These artist’s acrylics, though, are really tricky to work with. I found that you have to water the paint down, and apply multiple thin coats; four complete coats, and another spot coating to get even color saturation. The coarse dry-brushing - after the bulk of the Van Dyke Brown oil paint has been wiped away - leaves a nice patina on the surface that evens out the weathering, IMO.
  21. Well, Dan, with my research errors and oversights - your system has not been completely wrong. She’ll be coming to stay with you soon; move date is 2/21.
  22. Haha, thanks EJ! No, I still have ornamental work to do on the upper bulwarks, which I’m not yet sure how it will be attached; the amortisement of the QGs, the mermaid figures, etc. Those parts can wait, for now. In fact, I messed up a little because I meant to mask a section, on the lower hull, for the lower section of the QG - which I also am not sure how I will make and how it will attach to the hull. No biggie, though; I’m a pro at scraping plastic, at this point.
  23. It has been my style to document every little step forward, and I will not change course now. I primed the shells tonight, and it is quite gratifying to see all the detail and different color plastics coalesce into one thing. The bow and stern extensions have blended-in smoothly. The iron work is prominent enough to notice, but not so much that it’s distracting. Painting is going to be FUN!

About us

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

SSL Secured

Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured

NRG Mailing Address

Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917

About the NRG

If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.

The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.

The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.

Our Emblem

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
×
×
  • Create New...