SardonicMeow

Thanks for clarifying, Eamonn. I think the right name for the sail you're describing is the fore staysail. Looking at your (really lovely) pictures of the Ballahoo in profile, there is a very short distance between the fore mast and fore stay, so I assumed there would be no fore staysail. But it's certainly possible. As always, I look forward to seeing your progress.

I've been spending a little while looking at your diagram. The only major issue I see is the foresail sheet. Perhaps you intended to assign that to the aft pinrails, but put it on the fore pinrails by mistake? Also, I don't see what a foresail halyard would do, as the foresail can be raised and lowered with the gaff peak / throat halyards.

Hi, Max. If you have discovered any new techniques in Fusion 360, please share. As for including pictures, start a reply, then click on the "choose files" link at the bottom where it says "Drag files here to attach, or choose files..." Move your cursor into the position in your text where you want the image to appear, then click the plus sign on the image. For more help, look in the "How to use the MSW forum" forum.

Very interesting to see a different take with the painted hull, coppered bottom, and modified anchors. Thanks for sharing.

Here's a picture I took of the figurehead on the E. C. Collier. I love how yours captures the same feel and style of this and other skipjack figureheads I've seen.

Nope. The mistake is not yours, it's Artesania Latina's. You're finding flaws in the kit that every other builder also encounters. I like your fix for the rudder. I think it'll look better than the correction I made to mine. To my eye, your stem still looks a little low. You'll need the bowsprit at an angle such that a line from the end of the bowsprit running aft towards the bow will be able to go over the bow railing.

Yes, the horizontal lines are the waterlines. In the plans you posted, they are labelled F, G, H, and I in two of the three views. They are not labelled in the side view, but you can figure out which match the corresponding lines in the other drawings. To make the vertices match up to the lines, you'll need to subdivide the plane object to get the right number of lines, then slide the lines up, down, left, or right to match up with the lines in the plans.

Ok. You're asking about the waterlines. On the plans that you posted, the waterlines are marked F, G, H, and I. These lines appear as straight lines on the first two pictures and are curved in the view from above. In my procedure, I create a Blender plane and subdivide it so that it matches the way the lines are arranged on the plan. Here is the side view of the plans I used and below that the blender object. By subdividing it this way, there is a vertex at every intersection of each of the lines. Here is another view of the same. Notice that at the beginning, the object is flat. The vertices will need to be pulled out into the hull shape. Here is a similar view with the other plan image visible. Also, I have deleted some of the vertices that I know will be unused. At this point, to follow the curve of a waterline, you have to go along each vertex of the waterline and move them one by one outwards to match the line on the plans. This picture is the view from above after a single waterline has been completed. And here is the same from a different viewing angle. I have captured both a wireframe and solid view. You can see how the vertices for a single waterline have been pulled out to match the proper curve. To complete the hull, it's just a matter of repeating the same procedure for all the other lines. I hope that answers your question, but if not, let me know and I'll try to explain further.

I'm not sure what you mean by "match the curvature of the top view". Can you post a picture?

Thank you for this, Phil. It's by far the best explanation of schooner rigging I've seen in one place. I do have a question about the jib / fore staysail inhaul. Wouldn't the more common arrangement be a downhaul that starts at the peak, runs down the stay (either through the hanks or free) to a block at the bowsprit, then to the bow? That would allow the sail to be entirely hauled down to the bowsprit, which isn't possible with a line attached at the tack. In this arrangement, the tack would simply be attached by a hook at a fixed point at the bowsprit cap or traveler. Maybe there would be an inhaul for a flying jib, but a downhaul + hooked tack for a jib or fore staysail?

Welcome to Model Ship World! You're off to a great start. The trenails on your deck are particularly well done. I look forward to seeing your further progress.

All the lanyards have been tightened and the sheer poles have been added. The next logical step is to run the ratlines. Yes, the ratlines are definitely the next thing that should be done. I have never done ratlines before. I'm really intimidated by the ratlines. An so, to avoid doing the ratlines, I worked on the boom and gaffs. First, of course, a few 3D printed parts. The dowels for the boom and gaffs were cut and formed. And all of it was glued together and painted black. Also pictured is the jib boom which I worked on a little while ago but haven't pictured here before.

I haven't tried 3D printing blocks, but could give it a try. Now would be a good time, as I am actively avoiding the unpleasant task of tying ratlines on my Sultana. I did try printing deadeyes, but did not take any pictures at the time. From what I recall, deadeyes of diameter 4.5mm and larger were acceptable, but attempts at smaller diameters were malformed. Looking through my pictures, I did find the one below where I tried to produce grating. Left to right the hole size increases. Top to bottom the distance between holes increases. For the covers for the hatches on my Sultana, I used gratings with holes of 1.1mm per side and .7mm between holes.

Below is a picture of my Sultana, still in progress. As an experiment, I have been using 3D printing for as many parts as I can. Results have varied. Some parts are convincing, others suffer from the limitations of 3D printing with a consumer-level printer. There is a limit to the level of detail, and sharp edges are often impossible to achieve. And, of course, even when painted well, plastic can't match the texture and appearance of wood. Anyway, look it over, try to spot what is 3D printed, and I'll list the 3D printed pieces below the image. List of 3D printed parts: White figurehead Yellow quarterbadges All the black railings, caprails, stanchions, hull trim, channels, catheads, etc. Most items in red including the tiller, binnacle, hatches, pumps, windlass and bitts Gratings on the hatches Mast hoops Mast cleats Mast caps and bowsprit cap Have a look at my build log for details of each specific part.

For the deadeyes on my Sultana, I used the very thin beading needles pictured below. These are by far the thinnest needles I have found. However, even though the needles are flexible, I could not use a full needle because the deadeyes are mounted so close to the hull. I get around this, I cut a needle short and bent it into a curve. The bent needle, much abused but still in one piece after threading 16 pairs of deadeyes, is also visible in the picture.