Jump to content

stuglo

Members
  • Posts

    701
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stuglo

  1. 2 hours ago, Kevin Kenny said:

    The reason i get so many nice tools from new york is that one of my daughter lives there and i send all my on line purchase tools to her apartment. Tools for woodworking. I’ve actually only found two great physical stores to visit. The first is  “tools for woodworking “ . Its located in a bit of a grubby area so don't take your wife as i did. 112 26th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11232. They also have a web site toolsforwoodworking.com so you can see what they have. The other is. jak Jewelry tools 37 west 46th street in Manhattan. You have to walk up a number of stairs and there is lots of security all around the place . I guess they must make jewelry around the area. Again they have a web site jakjewelrytools.com. My usual on line store is Lee Valley which has some wonderful miniature tools that i have shipped to her home. 

    Thank you again

  2. On 7/19/2023 at 8:08 PM, Kevin Kenny said:

    The Foredom is a totally different tool. It runs at around 20,000 rpm and is full of power. The Turbo carves runs at 400,000 rpm and has no power what so ever. You paint with the turbo while you cut with the Foredom. You will have to use one to understand what i mean. I have long had a compressor so that cost is not of concern for me. The hand piece is around $200. 

    You've  reawakened my interest in this tool. What would you suggest as the basic burrs and accessories based on your experience ?

  3. "am working on the handrails. It's all done with 0.2 mm black monofilament line,"

    Was it easy to fit the CONTAINMENT rails after handrails, or better to do these first?

    Your build is an excellent one. My painting with spray cans was OK for the hull but excessive for the deck fittings. Probably my inexperience and lack of patience.

  4. On 3/9/2023 at 9:36 AM, stuglo said:

    I'm spending more time correcting the wooden parts than I would have if I made them from scratch. The design is really good, the the fun in the project drains away with the frustration and annoyance. The old kits I built were far less inaccurate. ? Imperfect or inappropriate use of modern technology + lack of consideration for the purchaser/builder?

    In fairness, I must update these comments, because as I proceed with the build, the PE and plastic parts are really compensating for the initial frustration. The amount of work and expertise that must have gone into the planning details is phenomenal. The issue with the wood should be easily rectified; then the kit will be perfect. 

  5. 4 minutes ago, Ian B said:

    No happy to have side conversations were all doing the same build ...

    I'm spending more time correcting the wooden parts than I would have if I made them from scratch. The design is really good, the the fun in the project drains away with the frustration and annoyance. The old kits I built were far less inaccurate. ? Imperfect or inappropriate use of modern technology + lack of consideration for the purchaser/builder?

  6. On 11/3/2021 at 8:21 PM, ted99 said:

    Rod--In reading your build log I saw a comment on the cost of this kit.  My experience with the top-end wooden kits is that the Brit sources are the cheapest plus "in-stock" and the US sources the most expensive and "special order only".  No import duties and preferential air shipping rates have always been a winner.

     

    I am building this as display-only, so I've decided to glue down the deck.  Just reached the point of gluing the deck and it's the moment of truth for decisions made earlier.  I mentioned I really had trouble figuring out the instructions for the armor belt "step" and did a true step at the stern (repeating the picture of this).  At the bow, I did a smooth transition as the proper treatment was not evident from the notches cut in the tops of the bulkheads.  All became perfectly clear when I started fitting the decks.  I wish I had trial fitted the decks earlier, because the proper treatment would have been obvious.  The "step" treatment I did at the Aft end is correct and should be repeated at the Bow between bulkheads 13 and 14.  There will be a slight delay as I go back and correct for this mistake.  One of the photos shows the doubling I am doing behind the planking between 13 and 14 to give me room to cut out the correct step.

     

    Some of my photos show a relatively thick nail head protruding above the plank surface as I was doing the two rows of planking above the armor belt.  I correctly judged that the sanding in this restricted area would be much easier without nail heads.  As I mentioned earlier, Amati doesn't provide enough nails to put one in every plank and every bulkhead, so I used some left over from previous builds.  These were slightly shorter and slightly thicker than the Amati nails.  I drill a pilot hole for every nail and it turned out that if I used a slightly undersized pilot hole, a partially driven thicker nail held the plank firmly against the bulkhead as the glue dried.  If I had it to again, I would have used this technique for all the planks.  The nails are very easy to pull out after the glue dries.  I think this works because the hull profile, combined with the planking layout shown in the instructions doesn't require much force to hold a plank to a bulkhead.  I'm not sure if this would work with the Amati nails as they are the thinnest I have ever seen.  At most, I would only use the Amati nails driven fully at the ends of planks as this is the place needing the most holding power.  I found that a #65 drill was optimum size for maximum grip on the Amati nails.  It turned out I preferred to use a slightly larger drill, but only drilled to 3/4 of the nail length.  The Amati nails are so thin that it's very easy to bend one if the pilot hole is undersized.  Using a pilot hole just a hair larger than the nail, but less than full length of the nail allowed easy placement of the nail in the hole and the final 1/4 of the length gripped firmly in the ply bulkhead.  As I said, given what I now know, I would use slightly larger nails partially driven till the glue dries, and then pull them out.

     

    Bow picture shows the most complex area for sanding

     

     

    IMG_0193.jpg

    IMG_0191.jpg

    IMG_0184.jpg

    I see you have fixed the 1st planking before the decks. Is this in the plans because mine says to complete the planking after the decks are fitted? Your way seems easier and better.

  7. Finishing my Swan Class Sloop

    Mast Wedges, stubs for the masting, and a figure head.

    I purchased the Lion figure (boxwood?) online from PRC. Required some adaptation for fitting.

    Not one of the class as listed, but I read somewhere that a generic lion figure was sometimes used even when the ship’s name was something else.

     

    Well, 30 months, about 3000 hours, 500+ postings. What a voyage of discovery. There were times, particularly at the beginning, that I wondered if I’d even depart the harbour. Of course, without the practicum TFFM books , Dan Vardas blogs and Kevin’s Videos, I would have been sunk many times. Thank you all.

    Thanks to the Bosun (wife) for tolerating my taking a spare bedroom (and sometimes a second one), disappearing for hours, making noise in the early hours of the morning, and turning a blind eye to the expense of the new tools that I acquired. My grandchildren, perhaps hoping to inherit the ship, are even more attentive than usual.

    Like a good book that you regret when finishing, so is this project.

    I have more on the shelf, but will return to a Swan, perhaps with reduced innards, but fully planked and rigged. I have volume 4 TFFM and enough cherrywood stock.

     

    And now for something completely different (Monty Python)----

     

    The BISMARK - Amarti kit.

    19123.jpg

    19a123.jpg

    19b123.jpg

    19c123.JPG

    19d123.jpg

    19f123.jpg

  8. The Stern Lantern

     

    At first glance, intimidating, but with the usual TFFM breaking it down into stages, was do-able.

    The major hurdle- Munions and Door ( a hexagonal construct tapering towards the base)- were bought as part of the photo etched addition.

    The main difficulty is bending along the grooves between the sections. I spray painted with aerosol as I find it gives a better finish than “blackening” liquids.

    The inside is supposed to be red but I omitted this detail. 

    Beneath is a thin Lower Rim. A symmetrical hexagon 13.15 mm across. I made it from a 0.18mm thick brass strip  using the TFFM pattern.(A frame from etched parts from an old kit. I find cutting to shape difficult, so after roughing it out, use the band sander.)

    Epoxy to Lamp for rigidity and spray paint black.

     

    Roof.

    Thickness given as 3.18 but the drawing is more like 3.6mm Looking at my plans, I went with this.

    Used blank 16mm sq. and as instructed, drilled a small (.7) hole at 14.5deg.near the center.

    Cutting out the largest and smallest part of the patter, made a pinhole in the center, and threaded one above and the other below the blank. ENSURE a side above and below, aligned and sand to the pattern ALLOWING FOR THE “BULGES” as required.(also slanting aftwards). I used a small hand held band sander and it worked easier than I thought possible.

     Genius of the author of TFFM on display again.

    The Vent and Vent Top

    - are shaped from some scrap soft metal alloy, and coloured black.

    The Lights

    Cut from 0.26mm plastic sheet. I find though that even the smallest amount of glue gives vapors that cause opacity. ADVICE sought for the future.

    The Base.

    Similar technique to the Roof.

    Blank 11.5x6.5 and 4.25mm thick.

    Drill at 14.5deg, pin aligned pattern above and below, and sand to shape.

     

    Stool and Crank.

    I simplified these by making a thin rim with my brass strip, and combined the Stool with the part the Stool sits on (? is that bit called a tang).

    Again, something left over was exactly what I needed.

    Eyebolts either side of the Roof, and on the Capping Rail, above the Counter timber.

    Connected by Support Rods - 0.26mm for which I used covered wire,

    Central hole in Taffarel for the ensemble at the height shown on the plan.


     

     

     

    13123.jpg

    13a123.jpg

    14123.jpg

    15123.jpg

    15a123.jpg

    15b123.jpg

    15c123.jpg

    16a123.jpg

    16123.jpg

  9. The Lower Finishing.

    Made in 2 parts, separated by the Lower Finishing Rail.

    An Upper Counter, depth 3mm. Rim as molding narrowing sharply from the Lower Stool. 

    (Initially used a scraper from Artesena Latina, but this damaged the upper surface, so just beveled by sanding).

     

    Lower Finishing Rail- 0.8mm thick, slightly proud of the lower rim of the Upper Counter.

     

    Lower Counter.

    Took a blank 35x10x8mm. The upper surface from the given patten, slightly smaller than the overlying Rail.

    The downward narrowing is more acute aft.

    Inward surface shaped to match ship’s side.

     

    The Drop -  made separately.

    This is pierced by a discharge tube from the Head inside the captain’s cabin.

     

    Console Brackets.

    Adapted from the pattern in TFFM

    10123.jpg

    10a123.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...