Jump to content

Patrick Matthews

Members
  • Posts

    391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Patrick Matthews

  1. Sorry I missed your post! Email or PM will get my attention faster. Let me know if help is still needed.
  2. Another CAD model posted on Grabcad for free download- my favorite tugboat, Henry Ford's "Dearborn". https://grabcad.com/library/tugboat-dearborn-1 This is the one I tried Delftship on... but gave up and went back to Fusion360.
  3. Very nice & complete work! Yes, my goal is to document vessels in a manner useful for modelers. I'm not creating 3d printable files. But my documentation includes 2d drawings as well as a 3d CAD model. The cad model can be used directly, or examined to better understand my abbreviated 2d work I do like the DS lines drawings, and that's another area that F360 erects unnecessary roadblocks... But I'm finding ways to work around those too. See my Fire Fighter model for example: https://grabcad.com/library/fire-fighter-fireboat-1
  4. Nope on the 3D DXF. That results in a mesh not unlike an STL- points joined by straight connectors, resulting in a faceted surface. It is NOT a smooth curvy surface. The IGES export is smooth & curvy... I just don't know if the entire side of my hull with its compound curved surfaces comes out in one patch or not. Why do this? Because while Fusion 360 can be a pain for creating lofted hulls, it's a champ for making all the other details. And it has history, which is priceless in large complex models. So if I can make a correct hull in DS, I'd just export the shape to F360. But as I detail above, that subdivided surface from DS using a control mesh is WRONG, and it requires a lot of tweaking to correct. Now, with much gnashing of teeth, I have been able to create a reasonable lofted hull in F360... so it's just a matter of which path is less headache. My F360 generated hull:
  5. Thanks! My biggest question regards the IGES output, only available in the Pro version. They told me it can output many, maybe hundreds, of surface patches, which would likely look like a mosaic when used in other CAD software. But if, for example on my tug hull, it comes out as smooth single patch for the main surface, that would be fine. They sent me a sample IGES file, but it was of a simple developable hull, so not really a test of this feature. The transom (port) was fractured, but I stitched the surface patches in Fusion360, and it all merged nicely (stbd).
  6. Here's an end view showing some of these features: White: Original control points and the control mesh with its straight Tinkertoy connectors. The control points lay on the proper body sections from the lines drawing. Green: Body sections cut through the DS developed hull surface... they miss by a lot. Even at the deck edges. Pink: Nice curvy marker curves that DS draws for the second import of the original control points. These markers are the target, I need to move the green lines to match them. To move any one point: Click on it, and you can enter new numbers or use the little arrow to move the point by set increments, very handy. Move each and every one this way to drag the developed sections around.
  7. So here's the second most important thing for DS users to know: Lines imported from a lines drawing DO NOT create a hull true to those lines! First most important? It can be fixed. As above: "The developed hull shape does NOT go through the control points, which are input from the original lines drawing... they just INFLUENCE the shape. Fine except it's not, because the developed form no longer matches the original. There must be a work flow that gets the generated shape closer to the desired form." Indeed the DS developed hull cuts corners, it's always well to the inside (concave side) of input curves, except at the "corners". Imagine you have a magnetic rubbery sheet pegged by its 4 corners to the floor, exactly where you want the corners. Then you hang a bunch of magnets from the ceiling, and each magnet is hanging exactly where you want the sheet to stretch and rise to, defining some sort of hill (I'm picturing Richard Dreyfuss building Devil's Tower in his living room). But while the sheet is stretchy, it's not THAT stretchy, and it hovers over the floor but doesn't quite reach the magnets. Oops. That's what we have in DS, with the developed hull not reaching the input points. How to fix it? Just keep raising the magnets until the sheet rises to the proper place. In DS, I did this, though there may be more efficient ways: 1. Import the control points once to define the control mesh and its resultant malformed hull. 2. Import the control points a second time as "marker curves". Markers are static curves, immutable, and they serve as references of where the original control points and desired hull sections are. 3. In an end view, compare the developed body sections (which are wrong) to the desired shape shown by the marker curves. Now start moving control points sideways or vertically to slowly pull the body sections towards their markers. Yes, this modifies the original control points and mesh! 4. Note that this is iterative... moving one point affects the adjacent surface faces, so you'll need to sweep back and forth over all the points to get everything close. 5. Also note that the four edges of your rubber sheet between the corner pegs were also pulled off the floor when the magnets started lifting the center. Same thing in DS- the edges at deck edge and keel also have moved out of place. So the adjusting exercise needs to address those too. I did this for my tugboat hull, and while it still needs some adjustment, it's much closer to the desired shape now (below). More: While you can get close by doing this, you can also turn on curvature displays to better smooth (fair) your new shapes. I haven't done this yet, may not need to for my present purposes. More #2: The Pro version of DS has an "automatic fairing" tool. I'm not sure how this works, but it could be of help.
  8. I did receive replies from DS HQ: 1. The forum is not broken, new posts are moderated. But still, not so much recent activity, which is curious. 2. Hull surfaces exported as IGES are "smooth parametric surfaces, but please keep in mind that the exported hull can consist of many (sometimes hundreds) of such surfaces." So it's not clear yet whether that would look like a broken mosaic when imported into my CAD.
  9. Thanks and yes, but a lot of material is a bit dated. I don't see much recent activity, makes me wonder if this is still a popular tool? I sent an email to DS HQ asking why their forum is broken... no answer yet. But I'm wrestling with topics like: - The developed hull shape does NOT go through the control points, which are input from the original lines drawing... they just INFLUENCE the shape. Fine except it's not, because the developed form no longer matches the original. There must be a work flow that gets the generated shape closer to the desired form; - Deck camber- the "Extrude Curved" tool is supposed to generate a nicely cambered deck, except it doesn't... it's generating garbage for me; - You can pop 160 euro for the Pro version which will output the surfaces in IGES format. But what format? A faceted mesh, or a proper smooth surface? The available exports in the free version just give the faceted mesh, which looks terrible when imported into, say, Fusion360 (as seen below). Unusable. The whole reason for me exploring Delftship is its better ability to generate hull shapes, compared to the buggy tools in F360, whadda headache (that area around the sternpost/stern counter is a BEAR to loft). Maybe I should pop for Rhino, $995 ouch.
  10. I'd like to get help at the official Delftship forum: https://forum.delftship.net/ but it seems broken and/or unused... I can't successfully post there, and most topics and responses are at least weeks old...
  11. Or instead of spending hundreds of hours drawing it, spend a few bucks to get them properly scanned and then post them somewhere for posterity. It's a shame how many drawings are out there that will never get shared...
  12. Years ago I attempted to correct the Revell Fire Fighter kit with a load of 3d printed parts. Now I've finally completed a CAD model of FF, and posted it and a bunch of supporting info on GrabCAD for free download. No printable parts in the file, but I've created a correct shape for the hull and house, and show where all the "ornaments" are hung: https://grabcad.com/library/fire-fighter-fireboat-1 You can spin the model around using GrabCAD's 3d viewer.
  13. The 3D CAD model is complete and available for free download from GrabCAD: https://grabcad.com/library/lifeboat-uslss-1908-mclellen-type-e-36-footer-1 Find the 3D STEP file there, along with reference photos and the original 2D drawings I worked from. Take the model for a spin at GrabCAD!
  14. Another update- the entire PILAR 3D model is now on GrabCAD, along with 2D drawings for the cabin structure. I may be adding more 2D detail drawings, but the underlying geometry is all there now in the 3D STEP file. Take the 3D model for a spin at GrabCAD! https://grabcad.com/library/pilar-model-in-1-12-scale-1
  15. I'm often asked about drawings for my 1:12 scale model of Pilar (Hemingway's boat), and I always reply with my sob story: a) I lost the files when I retired and lost access to my work CAD system (true), and b) it's as much work to create shareable drawings as it is to build the physical model (true). But now I am recovering the CAD model from digital debris I have laying around, and am preparing shareable model files. The first part, the hull framing, is now posted for free download at my GrabCAD page: https://grabcad.com/library/pilar-model-in-1-12-scale-1 The 3D STEP file is there, as well as full (model) size 2D drawings in PDF format. Those print out on ANSI "E" sheets, you need 36" wide paper for that. The images here are reduced! Use the downloadable PDFs instead. Cabin and additional fittings will follow in good time. The JPGs below are reduced, get the full size PDFs at the GrabCAD page.
  16. One of the highest achievements of research is the publication of your work. I've often been too lazy to share designs-- it seems to take as much work to put one's research into shareable format as it does to build a physical model! But I'm trying to rectify that. I often use CAD to help work out designs and to support the building activity, but I'm also finding it just as rewarding to simply make a CAD model and share that... and the CAD model is much easier to keep the dust off of. I'm posting my CAD models for free download at GrabCAD. Other sites are available, but this works for me: https://grabcad.com/patrick.matthews-1 You can go into each model posting to find additional materials, such as photos, documents, and original drawings, as well as the CAD model itself. The site has a 3D viewer that allows you spin the model around for preview, nice. So far, I have posted: - 1909 San Francisco fireboat - 1945 ATSF RR tugboat - 1908 USLSS lifeboat And now I'm going back and reassembling a mess of a CAD model for my interpretation of "Pilar".
  17. Continuing to add details, including the material appearances which allows for some nice renderings. Much more to do! For example, the couple score of copper air chambers for flotation. By the way, that's not a steering wheel on the aft bulkhead- it operates the reversing mechanism, which normally would just be a lever if you were standing next to the engine. The single crank is for starting the engine, while the T-handle crank is the primary steering tool. The galvanized air tank below the aft bulkhead gets compressed gas directly from the engine cylinder, and is used to operate the whistle seen on that aft bulkhead. The main fuel tank is the copper object below the forward bulkhead. Gunmetal plates riveted through and through the keel members at both ends are used for hauling the boat up the ways.
  18. Mostly all wood of course, and lots of varnished mahogany, including the dual-diagonal planked hull, just like later and more famous Elcos... it would be pretty.
  19. Work in process, from original plans. 36' lifeboat as built for the USLSS by Elco in the early 1900s.
  20. Got something long that won't fit in your printer? You may be able to break it into segments, with strategic glue joints. I made a 20 inch long railing section this way, with half-lap joints in the rails. Joints were made with CA, but I still had some tiny gaps. These were filled with printer resin and zapped with a UV flashlight. Filed smooth, the joints are invisible. Long continuous railing: Lining up the segments: Half laps: You can use resin to fill gaps. Here I'm filling seams in styrene overlays. Use a UV flashlight and UV safety glasses:
  21. Thx, I think. p.83: "1. 24-pdr English long gun" It's already been established that contrary to an earlier opinion, she DIDN'T (for the most part) carry English guns. Probably doesn't matter much, they all looked about the same! Except for the mistaken English markings cast on the 1930 repro guns...
  22. Brenckle's post in 2015 suggests that: - The drawing of the "old" long gun barrel may well represent Constitution's 24 pdrs of 1812; - We have no idea if any of these exist today ("It is hoped that some of this information will help us identify some existing guns that might conform to types carried on Constitution during the War of 1812 and the following decades. If you know of any early 32-pounder carronades or 24-pounder long guns that match these measurements, we’d love to hear from you!") Desy & Monea (2015, https://ussconstitutionmuseum.org/2015/08/25/modern-armament/) also say that the reproduction guns present today are not correct, but without mentioning what IS correct. And no one seems to have specific carriage drawings, other than the several generic carriages of the period, such as depicted on p.2 of the pamphlet: https://www.navyhistory.org/the-constitution-gun-deck/ Will be interesting to see if Tucker sheds any light on all this. For a model of Constitution's 1812 24 pounder, I guess I'd go with the "old" barrel drawing and that generic carriage drawing. Oh, and use the words "might be" in any description of said model!
  23. Can anyone point me towards accepted info on Constitution's 24 pounders? I've read that the 1906 and 1930 restorations both resulted in the "wrong" guns being recreated for her, and the most (all?) of the current 24 pounders are from the 1930 restoration. But do we know what the "right" guns may have been? I'm hoping to find dimensional info to help in constructing a larger scale gun model. I searched here, but the number of hits are overwhelming while not shining light on this question...
×
×
  • Create New...