Jump to content

HMS Sphinx 1775 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Blue Ensign said:

little mini kit of the double Capstan

I have it and the stove, but mine are going in Winnie, if I can get that far once I start it. That will keep me occupied for a couple of years. 

Regards,

Glenn

 

Current Build: HMS Winchelsea
Completed Builds: HM Flirt (paused) HM Cutter CheerfulLady NelsonAmati HMS Vanguard,  
HMS Pegasus, Fair American, HM Granado, HM Pickle, AVS, Pride of Baltimore, Bluenose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TBlack said:

Steel's Elements of Mastmaking, Sailmaking, and Rigging. You can get a copy for $188.

Yikes! 😳

 

4 hours ago, Gregory said:

If you don't have to hold a book in your hand, here is a free E-book

Thanks...much cheaper!!

Bob Garcia

"Measure once, cuss twice!"

 

Current Builds: 

Hms Brig-Sloop Flirt 1782 - Vanguard Models

Pen Duick - Artesania Latina 1:28

 

Completed: Medway Longboat 1742 - Syren Ship Model Co. 

Member of the Nautical Research Guild

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking About colour

 

There are four main colours other than black to be used on the model.

Red, Blue, White, Yellow, and shades thereof.

 

On every build I have done the actual shade has exorcised my mind, particularly for the colour blue.

 

I am interested to see how various tones look against the mainly Pearwood finish.

181318905_DSC03538(2).thumb.JPG.0c73a0ac570f764acd0b2f66e768175d.JPG

3538(2)

This is my rough colour comparison chart painted on a Pearwood background. All I am interested in here is how the colour relates to what will be the bright finish between Wale and Waist rail.

 

The colour selection features paints from Vallejo, Admiralty (Jotika/Caldercraft) and Humbrol. The majority are water based but the Admiralty Red Ochre and Humbrol RAF Blue are oil versions as I didn’t have the acrylic versions to hand.

 

I favour the more muted tones as seen on contemporary models, and I hope with this build I can settle on a colour that does not require mixing as that relieves me of working out a formula for re-mixes.

 

 

My initial thoughts are:-

Vallejo Flat Red   - inboard works and some deck fittings.

 

Vallejo Grey/blue - Ground to the Topsides and stern decorations. (Humbrol RAF Blue (96) runs a close second.)

 

Admiralty Yellow Ochre – Frieze decorations, but with other shades of yellow and white for toning and highlights.

 

I don’t intend to use gold on any area of the model.

 

There is a very good section on painting decorative friezes in Volume 11 of the ffm, the techniques of which can be applied to the brass etched versions supplied with the kit to good effect.

 

I am undecided about the lower hull as yet, if it’s good enough I may not paint it at all, but if I do I may need to tone a bright white down a little.

 

This is the last of my musings before that large box hopefully arrives next week and the build begins in earnest.

 

 

B.E.

21/08/21

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, James H said:

Be careful of Vallejo Red. 

 

I have two bottles here of the same catalogue number, and they are very different. The older one paints dead easy and is quite vibrant. The newer one looks 'dirtier' and doesn't paint anywhere near as easily with a brush. 

I second the Vallejo Red oppinion.

 

although BE Lists "Flat Red", not "Red" (in some lists as Tomato Red, number 031 vs Red number 033), i made the mistake of usind the "normal" red and it is dirty

Jacek

 

Current Build: HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models 1/64 

On Hold/Parallel: Lady Nelson - Amati/Victory Models 1/64

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jasseji said:

I second the Vallejo Red oppinion.

 

although BE Lists "Flat Red", not "Red" (in some lists as Tomato Red, number 031 vs Red number 033), i made the mistake of usind the "normal" red and it is dirty

I didn't realise that James may have been referring to a different 'Red'

 

I picked up the use of 'flat red' from members who had used it on their builds. I think I first used it back in 2017 on my Model shipways Pinnace build, and have used it on all builds since, latterly on the Royal Barge kit.

 

It always pays to test any paint on a strip of the wood to be used, before applying paint to the model.

 

B.E.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do these color boards too. I was amazed that the Cerulean Blue I bought from three different manufacturers, Golden, Grumbacher, and Winsor & Newton are completely different.  I was thinking ‘Cerulean’ means ‘whatever’ Blue. 

 

I also prefer Admiralty Yellow Ochre over Gold for decorations, just seems right.

Edited by glbarlow

Regards,

Glenn

 

Current Build: HMS Winchelsea
Completed Builds: HM Flirt (paused) HM Cutter CheerfulLady NelsonAmati HMS Vanguard,  
HMS Pegasus, Fair American, HM Granado, HM Pickle, AVS, Pride of Baltimore, Bluenose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glenn,

 

As a sometime painter this variation in a colour of the same name from different manufacturer is very common. Names are just a guide.  there is no standardization.  These days some manufacturers specify the Pantone reference or the CMYK values (which of course you can reproduce in Photoshop)  and you will find they are very different. Many colours are still made from naturally occurring minerals.  Red and yellow ochre for example.  You don't have to travel very extensively to know that the ochre cliffs in different geographic regions vary enormously in colour.  So the source a manufacturer chooses for his pigment will affect the resulting colour. So you will find "yellow ochre" varies enormously from one manufacturer to the next.

 

John

Edited by bartley

Current Build:

Medway Longboat

Completed Builds:

Concord Stagecoach

HM Cutter Cheerful

Royal Caroline

Schooner for Port Jackson

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads up Chris, I am a compulsive book buyer; that one  looks interesting but will have to wait awhile.

 

I think I'm pretty settled on the shade I want for this particular model, but in practice it's all artistic license, the official colour for topsides on British ships was any colour as long as it's black. 

The Admiralty order dates back to 12th July 1715, and is cited by L.G.Carr-Laughton in his book Old ship Figure-heads and sterns.

 

This would apply more certainly in relation to a modest ship like Sphinx, but my model will display her with a fetching shade of  blue as ground to the friezes , which in practice she probably didn't have either.

 

B.E.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/21/2021 at 12:37 AM, Blue Ensign said:

Thinking About colour

 

There are four main colours other than black to be used on the model.

Red, Blue, White, Yellow, and shades thereof.

 

On every build I have done the actual shade has exorcised my mind, particularly for the colour blue.

 

I am interested to see how various tones look against the mainly Pearwood finish.

181318905_DSC03538(2).thumb.JPG.0c73a0ac570f764acd0b2f66e768175d.JPG

3538(2)

This is my rough colour comparison chart painted on a Pearwood background. All I am interested in here is how the colour relates to what will be the bright finish between Wale and Waist rail.

 

The colour selection features paints from Vallejo, Admiralty (Jotika/Caldercraft) and Humbrol. The majority are water based but the Admiralty Red Ochre and Humbrol RAF Blue are oil versions as I didn’t have the acrylic versions to hand.

 

I favour the more muted tones as seen on contemporary models, and I hope with this build I can settle on a colour that does not require mixing as that relieves me of working out a formula for re-mixes.

 

 

My initial thoughts are:-

Vallejo Flat Red   - inboard works and some deck fittings.

 

Vallejo Grey/blue - Ground to the Topsides and stern decorations. (Humbrol RAF Blue (96) runs a close second.)

 

Admiralty Yellow Ochre – Frieze decorations, but with other shades of yellow and white for toning and highlights.

 

I don’t intend to use gold on any area of the model.

 

There is a very good section on painting decorative friezes in Volume 11 of the ffm, the techniques of which can be applied to the brass etched versions supplied with the kit to good effect.

 

I am undecided about the lower hull as yet, if it’s good enough I may not paint it at all, but if I do I may need to tone a bright white down a little.

 

This is the last of my musings before that large box hopefully arrives next week and the build begins in earnest.

 

 

B.E.

21/08/21

 

What is the ffm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Blue Ensign said:

Now it seems like my log is being spammed with irrelevant comments.

 

If you wish to announce the arrival of your kits, your own logs are the ideal place to do it.

 

Thank you,

 

B.E.

 

Everyone who has just announced the happy arrival of their newborn Sphinx, please open a build log. We want to see them all of course, but it will save B.E.'s log from being overwhelmed with your news. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Building the Sphinx - Post One

This is where the build starts in earnest, I always start a build with a keel support, partly to hold the hull in the early stages and partly to keep the false keel straight.

It also provides a level surface to check square.

DSC03625.thumb.JPG.1dcda7a8567c00bc25ed3f164c14160a.JPG

3625

DSC03624.thumb.JPG.3b109400b642fc265c2df1b86f8d5e4f.JPG

3624

DSC03623.thumb.JPG.c0ad9af7eda9c89b8d787490eb34c869.JPG

3623

This will be modified several times during the course of the build.

 

I don’t intend to do a step-by-step assembly log, there is the excellent manual for that.

I do have to mention what a wonderful job Chris and James have done in producing the manual, probably the best I’ve ever seen.

 

My initial view of what I have seen in the box is very positive, I have not concerned myself with checking every part against the parts list as I know Chris will respond to any issues that may crop up.

 

I will restrict this log to commenting on areas where I have had difficulty or found problems (hopefully very few), areas where I have made modifications, and the approach I have taken in tackling different stages of the build where it diverts from the indicated path.

 

Time to introduce bulkheads to false keel.

 

B.E.

 

24/08/21

 

Edited by Blue Ensign
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post Two

 

Bulkheads

 

Fitting the bulkheads is a painless exercise, the one that gave me some concern is the lower stern pattern. (13-1)

DSC03626.thumb.JPG.7e287c96faf08c51aef072c49def7d89.JPG

3626

Fairing off the model is indicated but in this area it is all about degrees and I worry about how much to do off the model.

This is where the lower planking will sweep up to the transom and it needs to be a smooth convex curve without any hint of an angle.

032.thumb.JPG.06131962319fc03ce4362140fd24f0f5.JPG

032

This photo of my Pegasus build shows the run of planking and ultimately the fairing can only be done on the model using test planks.

 

For this reason, I will be very careful how much off model sanding I do in this area, and I don’t think I can trust myself with the Dremel.

I found that part 13 needed a little light sanding in the slot and several dry fits before it would slide smoothly down the keel to be glued to 13-1.

DSC03679.thumb.JPG.aef11532038810c11b2c9a1f3e053c8d.JPG

3679

These things are fragile and cannot be forced into position without the risk of damage.

740641295_DSC03677(2).thumb.JPG.6f2d47f31e1982eccb8adebc9fd707b3.JPG

3677(2)

The bow patterns are easier to fit, and will be easier to fair.

DSC03678.thumb.JPG.5e42230b1df0c1ad72250f37a7d4b0ec.JPG

3678

With all the bulkheads in place I get my first real impression of the hull size and shape.

She is chunkier than Pegasus and is pleasing to my eye.

 

The Bow and Stern bulkheads will now be removed for preliminary fairing, at this point the remainder of the bulkheads  are only dry fitted but will probably not require removal again.

 

B.E.

25/08/21

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was reluctant to do this off ship fairing on Flirt so I went light. It does help to get things moving more quickly once back on the ship I found by having the basic introductory shape done off ship. 

Regards,

Glenn

 

Current Build: HMS Winchelsea
Completed Builds: HM Flirt (paused) HM Cutter CheerfulLady NelsonAmati HMS Vanguard,  
HMS Pegasus, Fair American, HM Granado, HM Pickle, AVS, Pride of Baltimore, Bluenose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, James H said:

Fairing those parts 'off model' is only about removing a rough quantity of material so that it's easier when you have everything together. 

 

The quantities you see me removing in the manual were further faired in when the full was ready for overall fairing. 

Thanks James, it looked quite a lot in the photos, I was concerned about taking too much off and getting out of shape. On the model you can constantly check progress with a planking strip.

 

B.E.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post Three

 

Platforms

Unusual in this type of kit, Chris has provided a short section of what would be the forward Platform below the lower deck.

In reality there would also be an aft platform which is not supplied.

 

These Platforms sat above the hold and are version of the Orlop deck on larger vessels.

I doubt very little will be seen of this with the hull planked and decked.

 

I considered the possibility of fabricating false frames and leaving an opening in the hull at this level, but what would be the ladderway above it is blocked by a bulkhead, and it is only clear above the Fore Hatchway. As a ladderway leading up to the Lower deck would be the only feature of interest I decided to pass.

 

Lower deck

This deck is another nice touch for what otherwise would be a re-inforcing piece to square up the bulkheads and provide  some rigidity to the hull.

 

This is also supplied in engraved plywood with the Hatchways and Ladderways detailed. The Fore Ladderway leads down to the Platform deck, or it would if the bulkhead wasn’t in the way.

 

My deck had some Laser burn on the engraved side which needed sanding to remove. This didn’t have any effect on the planking lines.

671428051_DSC03681(2)text.thumb.jpg.a205c0caeb43386660bf52d3d56898f2.jpg

3681(2)text

With the Lower deck slotted into place, gently does it on this exercise, it can be seen that altho’ the hatches will be covered by gratings, the Ladderways simply open onto bulkhead tops.

1926410536_DSC03680(2).thumb.JPG.7729b0bb954e45bab2f3d8e8cf36f06d.JPG

3680(2)

The Upper deck base is placed roughly in position to gauge what will be visible of the lower decks.

The Upper deck Fore Hatch is covered by a grating, but without it there is a view directly down to the Platform deck, altho’ the deficiency in the ladderway will be visible.

DSC03684.thumb.JPG.82bd7cba73a67edb889c94ae6a2afd50.JPG

3684

To rectify this would require removing a section from bulkhead 4 and a section of false keel between bulkheads 9 and 10 for the lower deck aft ladderway.

None of this of course is necessary but as my version will be open decks only, it is another option to think about, and I am sorely tempted.

 

B.E.

26/08/21

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Blue Ensign said:

Post Three

 

Platforms

Unusual in this type of kit, Chris has provided a short section of what would be the forward Platform below the lower deck.

In reality there would also be an aft platform which is not supplied.

 

These Platforms sat above the hold and are version of the Orlop deck on larger vessels.

I doubt very little will be seen of this with the hull planked and decked.

 

I considered the possibility of fabricating false frames and leaving an opening in the hull at this level, but what would be the ladderway above it is blocked by a bulkhead, and it is only clear above the Fore Hatchway. As a ladderway leading up to the Lower deck would be the only feature of interest I decided to pass.

 

Lower deck

This deck is another nice touch for what otherwise would be a re-inforcing piece to square up the bulkheads and provide  some rigidity to the hull.

 

This is also supplied in engraved plywood with the Hatchways and Ladderways detailed. The Fore Ladderway leads down to the Platform deck, or it would if the bulkhead wasn’t in the way.

 

My deck had some Laser burn on the engraved side which needed sanding to remove. This didn’t have any effect on the planking lines.

671428051_DSC03681(2)text.thumb.jpg.a205c0caeb43386660bf52d3d56898f2.jpg

3681(2)text

With the Lower deck slotted into place, gently does it on this exercise, it can be seen that altho’ the hatches will be covered by gratings, the Ladderways simply open onto bulkhead tops.

1926410536_DSC03680(2).thumb.JPG.7729b0bb954e45bab2f3d8e8cf36f06d.JPG

3680(2)

The Upper deck base is placed roughly in position to gauge what will be visible of the lower decks.

The Upper deck Fore Hatch is covered by a grating, but without it there is a view directly down to the Platform deck, altho’ the deficiency in the ladderway will be visible.

DSC03684.thumb.JPG.82bd7cba73a67edb889c94ae6a2afd50.JPG

3684

To rectify this would require removing a section from bulkhead 4 and a section of false keel between bulkheads 9 and 10 for the lower deck aft ladderway.

None of this of course is necessary but as my version will be open decks only, it is another option to think about, and I am sorely tempted.

 

B.E.

26/08/21

 

Hm, this is interesting, would it be possible to exchange the Hatch and ladder, or would this be very bad regarding the authenticity of the model ?

 

Like this:

image.png.d483366db972c4bbb5b2e4f056289997.png

 

Edit:

 

I take it back, it cant, because there is a ladder on the deck above in that place.

Hmm, interesting find

Edited by Jasseji

Jacek

 

Current Build: HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models 1/64 

On Hold/Parallel: Lady Nelson - Amati/Victory Models 1/64

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, chris watton said:

Fore and aft orlop platforms were included in original designs, but decided against. Due to bulkhead positionings, I removed, but kept fore platform but no ladderway. Original designs I did still show them..

Well  Chris, at least you have provided a run through  upper deck which has saved me the trouble of the serious mod  necessary on Pegasus, and for that I'm ever grateful.👍

 

B.E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post Four

Creating a Ladderway

 

This post involves modifying things to create a Fore hatch ladderway on the Lower deck down to the Fore Platform.

This is not for the faint hearted as it involves cutting Bulkhead 4 in half and trimming the false keel.

DSC03716.thumb.JPG.fc9f0ac109d4d7b9a8a7b8b71c11c5fb.JPG

3716

The bulkhead is halved, and the centre section is removed.

DSC03718.thumb.JPG.261255f6272f81e01ebf473a9103dfa6.JPG

3718

The short keel piece sticking up in the centre will also be removed.

DSC03719.thumb.JPG.72077c40b02324ebd2f7bce9516a51f4.JPG

3719

A test check of the Ladderway with the lower deck in place.

DSC03723.thumb.JPG.774aa85b02f998585258f2a0f489ce27.JPG

3723

Bulkhead 5 is glued into place along with the Fore Platform.

DSC03722.thumb.JPG.b5f9274f4dec1a037d18ac59e9607675.JPG

3722

The lower deck is temporarily refitted to hold the bulkhead in place until the glue sets.

DSC03753.thumb.JPG.737290578696fbc28b369c1d5738e2e1.JPG

3753

Bulkhead 4 halves are glued into place against the False keel and forward connections of the Platform.

DSC03747.thumb.JPG.a2f5a558199e0f8f83e71d7576aec6a3.JPG

3747

Bracing blocks are glued to the lower part of the bulkhead and the keel.

DSC03725.thumb.JPG.15a58ee199f93112cc2a4623510068d5.JPG

3725

The Lower deck was again put back to square the bulkheads.

DSC03755.thumb.JPG.f4d3bd873c32e9cf0d4c9b0ed1dc60f1.JPG

3755

The completed area opened up.

DSC03735.thumb.JPG.3162bdce59a8427260dbb3764ba86783.JPG

3735

DSC03752.thumb.JPG.799140551c3640678b23d941b1e121c7.JPG

3752

A ladder can now be installed once the hatchway coamings are fitted.

 

Onto the stern Ladderway and Aft Platform, which is a less  dramatic modification.

 

B.E.

26/08/21

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...