Hi,
Thanks for your responses. I have some more questions now
I wasn't expecting spiling to be the true original method. That's really good to know. Given the fairly extreme shapes that I've seen produced, how did they get wood stock that was wide enough?
When choosing to spile a 2-layer kit, do builders then choose to only have one layer instead (so you can see the result)? Given the fact that the kit is designed for 2 layers, does that then cause other problems later? Or should spiling only ever be considered for single layer kits in the first place?
I've read the "Simple Hull Planking for Beginners", and unless I'm misunderstanding they're basically using the same technique that's shown in the video that I posted earlier. In considering this method in comparison to #4, I have a concern...
In method #4, since the plank is being temporarily bent into place, marked, then cut, the resulting cut is effectively taking into account the curve of the hull. In this respect it shares a similartuy with the spiling technique in that the shape of the resulting plank allows it to follow the shape of the hull while only being bent along it's length and twisted. It doesn't have to bend across the width. This is obviously a good thing.
In #5 we're simply measuring the width at each bulkhead and then cutting the plank so that it has the right width at each point. It seems to me then this method doesn't take the hull shape into account. When the plank is bent around the hull I would expect to have to slightly force it up/down to mate up with the previous plank, thus forcing it to bend in all 3 dimensions.
Am I misunderstanding something? Why do you feel that #5 is better for keeping things under control?
Why can't I find anything online at all that describes technique #4?
Thanks of that information Jaager! I'm a sailor myself and I didn't know where those terms came from, so now I can impress my sailing buddies
Tim