-
Posts
64 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Dan DSilva
-
Thank you! Was getting time for the stem and keel. While basswood will do for the keel because it barely protrudes at all, I put off making the stem until I'd gotten some 1/16-inch plywood. This will also do for the channels and other parts that are at a risk of snapping. Dry-fitting. In retrospect, after the final shaping, the keel is a little too shallow. Triangulating the length of the curved beams to form the beakhead. Ideally there should be two beams that stand off the hull above the attached cheeks, but this is so small and cramped that I couldn't manage it. Also at this time it was feeling more necessary to start the display stand. Fitting the stands didn't go quite as intended, but you'll see the problem later. Drafting the tiny struts that go between the beams and cheeks was not possible, and fitting them by eye resulted in a crude appearance (they're slightly better now I've sanded them down). Current state of completion. I'd wanted to do the channels before posting this update, but I'm having difficulty deciding whether to insert them above or below the side thingies, and I've got a lot of schoolwork this week. The stand is not sanded or glued up yet; I'm still chewing over how to improve it. The props are 1/8-inch plywood so the thin upper parts won't break too easily. The forward prop is looking a little too far back and I'll probably replace it with one that fits maybe half an inch further forward. Also, the base is looking too big, but maybe it won't look quite so bad once the forward prop is moved forward. You can see here the lower mast, which is part of a bamboo cooking skewer, not yet tapered. I'm basing the proportions of the mast to the hull on this model.
-
Thank you all. To clarify, the fleet I'd like to build would be English at the start of the War of the Spanish Succession. (If I could have any ship of my choice as a kit, I'd start with HMS Britannia.) But the nationality of the ship the kit is based on doesn't matter as long as the period is correct and I can replace the flags and stuff. (It would not be any particular real-life English fleet, just one that would fit into the setting -- that's why the models don't have to be of any particular real-life English ships.) This is only part of the collection I hope to build someday and I don't mind hearing what other sailing ship kits in this scale are out there. It's just that the old "wooden wall" ships make for particularly complex models thanks to all the baroque ornamentation and the covered gun decks necessitating planked construction if open ports are to look convincing. There'll hopefully come a day when I can devote the time to scratchbuilding models like these, and I appreciate the advice and ideas about doing so. But I like to check for shortcuts before going about something the long way. --- Did a little more reading up. Apparently the Jolly Roger is based on the French Blonde-class of the 1750s. That definitely puts me on the fence about it. Anyone who recognizes the class knows what time period and nationality it belongs to, it's also a bit less portly than I would expect for an East Indiaman and perhaps has a lower, simpler stern than earlier ships. On the other hand, I don't see much other than that to distinguish it, and it's a cheap model and nicely detailed (I still have one that I built -- very badly -- back in elementary school).
-
Hello again, Anyone know of decent kits from around the turn of the 18th century? I'd be especially interested in large warships (a la Soleil Royal or San Felipe) and East Indiamen. I'd like to display them all together, but the scale doesn't need to be exact, let's say anything smaller than 1:120 but larger than 1:135. Right now the closest ones I know of are the Lindberg Captain Kidd (based on a ship from the 1660s, looks a bit old-fashioned for 1700) and Jolly Roger (guessing this one is mid-1700s).
-
Hello again, I have a question that pertains to the availability of both wood and plastic kits on the market. I note that under General Ship Model Kit Discussions there are separate subforums for wood and plastic and no general discussion covering both, so should I start two topics asking essentially the same question, or is there a tidier way of dealing with it?
-
I spaced the gunports carefully and somehow screwed up anyway, so the starboard bow gunport is a few millimeters too far back. Oh well. The guns are left over from an old plastic kit -- possibly a Revell Constitution. At 1:128 they're about as big as minion drakes. While deciding what to do about the doughnuts, I FINALLY took the hull to the belt sander. It's now starting to kinda look like a boat! Marking a flat-edged scrap of basswood for the keel. I bought the fiber washers. They're too small. In the meanwhile, another idea occurred to me that wouldn't cost anything since I already had the materials on hand. This is the second time wooden beads have come to my rescue (I also use them as arrow nocks). As with the other ideas, the beads did have to be bored out a little. Then I rounded down the end and got the finish off with some 320-grit sandpaper. In a perfect world I'd have been able to get about four slices off of each bead, but because they're short to begin with and just keep getting shorter and I couldn't think of a better way to hold them than my fingers, I only got two, so I now have four halves of beads left over. The bulwarks aren't really high enough for gunports, but in many period boats the doughnuts overlapped the rails and I'm cheating a bit by having them extend all the way to the top. The quarterdeck gunports are dummies. In fact, with the windlass in place, I doubt there'll be room for the bow guns either, but I felt like if it had any gunports, it wouldn't look right with less than four on each side. So we'll say it only carried four minion drakes, but had eight gunports in order to appear more formidable. Current state of completion, with the tops of the doughnuts sanded flush with the rail.
-
Hello again, Does anyone know where to get really thin round rods and sheets of wood or rigid plastic that would be suitable for making small-scale oars (like in the range of well under a millimeter)? I know there are types of plastic commonly used for scratchbuilding models, but I seem to be having trouble finding the right place to buy it.
-
Interesting. The admiralty plan for HMS Lion appears to have them, but I guess they may have been added later (it was in service until 1752) or maybe it was just unusual in that regard. Well, in any case, I've already drilled them. So it's gonna have them, period-correct or not. --- Fabricating them from scratch and getting nice rounded edges seems extremely delicate. Right now, I'm thinking of using either fiber washers or wooden bullseyes split along the grooves. Either would require boring out slightly with a needle file.
-
Thank you! The obvious solution: I sand the stern to a convex shape so the rudder stock hole is saved and the deck meets the back ends of the bulwarks symmetrically. The blank for the transom is cut to considerably longer than its final length and wet-molded to match the stern's curve. As with the deck thingy, the transom is then sanded to shape. The side thingies are applied in basically the same way as the bulwarks. I ran into a snag when I glued the starboard one noticeably farther down than the port one. Luckily I was able to break it off in one piece with an X-Acto, but that just makes me worry that this wood glue may not be as strong as I thought (maybe it weakens if it's not used up quickly enough?). The further I advance, the more detail I decide is necessary for it to look real. At this point I decided it was really necessary to add a rail around the tops of the bulwarks. I started by grinding and sanding about a millimeter off the top all around. Then I traced the edge onto a basswood sheet and added some extra width to provide a little overhang. After cutting the overall section out, I opened it by splitting with a knife instead of with a saw or cutoff wheel so there wouldn't be a gap, and traced the initial interior sections to be cut out. The insides of the rails shaped and sanded, I then wet-formed the rails with a bunch of pens as the contact points, a bag of marbles to distribute pressure, and a steel block for extra weight. Actually, at some point the block fell over and took the marbles and pens with it, but by then the rails had dried, so it was okay. When the glue was dry, a quick trip to the mini belt sander and a little finishing with fine sandpaper gives a shallow, nicely rounded overhang. I should've angled the back ends of the rails before glueing them, but my flat triangle needle file came to the rescue. I inserted some vertical rail sections as seen here and later trimmed them down and angled them. The transom rail is another wet-formed piece -- hopefully the last I'll have to do. It likewise has angled ends, and is sanded first on the inside, glued, and then sanded on the outside just like the main rails. Weighting down the transom rail. The curve of the transom was a little higher than the rail, which worked out well since the transom is the interior piece and could be sanded down to match the rail. If it had been the other way around, there would've been trouble. As you can see, I've started thinking about the cross-sectional shaping of the hull. I began by re-pencilling the grind lines that had previously been rubbed away. You can't see it in this picture, but I also added the groove for the keel and stem; it seemed like now was the time to do it, before rounding the bottom of the hull and risking the cutoff wheel sliding off-center. While the groove wound up a little too wide in spots, I hope to correct that with wood filler. Since the remaining pieces are straight, they were much faster to shape and glue. Here's the fully framed transom. For some reason I'm feeling excessively pleased with the angled joints. I briefly considered adding stern windows, but it doesn't seem feasible. I've come to realize that I didn't take the width of the stern rails and frames into account in my draft; thus the upper half of the stern is going to be too wide overall. Next step should be to drill the holes for the gunports and figure out how I'm going to make their doughnut-shaped frames. Then it'll be off to the belt sander to finally do the cross sectional shaping.
-
That's an interesting point, which I hadn't thought of. I've been attempting to construct a timeline of the novel, and several clues lead me to the working assumption that the story begins in 1840. The Pequod is a very old ship when the story takes place, but I figure the equipment that's most easily replaced (e.g. boats, harpoons, lances) should be pretty modern.
-
Hello again, I've decided to aim for 1:128 scale for my Pequod and other sailing ships.. Before resorting to scratchbuilding the boats, I thought I'd look around at what was already on the market. The best that I've found so far are 25- and 27-foot Montagu whalers made by Quaycraft. Of course, these are not 19th-century whaleboats; their bows are less raked than what I've seen and they would require added oarlocks. https://quaycraft.uk/product/25ft-whaler/ https://quaycraft.uk/product/27ft-whaler/ The other option I know of are Amati's 65mm boats. I don't know what real-world model they represent, but I believe it's a more modern naval design. Their bows have a better shape than the Montagu, but their interiors would require more modification. https://www.cornwallmodelboats.co.uk/acatalog/4975-Whaleboat-65mm-A4975.html I would greatly appreciate if anyone knows other models out there.
-
Seems like about time for an update. Part 1 of glueing down the bulwark. Part 2, glueing down the back half. These blocks of layered brass and steel were given to me years and years ago by an uncle to use as anvils. I don't know what their original purpose was. I somehow fitted the starboard bulwark a little forward and pushed to the left. As a result it stuck slightly past the midline at the bow and had to be trimmed back. Once it was glued in place, the only practical way to trim it was with the Dremel, and because none of the Dremel bits can fit into the tiny angle between the deck and the hull, there was a little lump left there that I had to compensate for by grinding a pit into the corresponding spot on the port bulwark. The thingy that goes along the port side is just a leftover from making the bulwark, while the starboard one is cut down from my first attempt at a bulwark that turned out too low. I had no idea basswood contains tannin, so I didn't put tape on the vise while shaping the first one and now it's a little bit ebonized. Another unfortunate result of the imperfect fitting is that the back edge of the starboard bulwark falls slightly short of the stern while the port one sticks out a bit. Obviously I shouldn't have trimmed it to length before glueing it in place, but there's an obvious solution which you've probably already guessed. Realized that I should've drilled the hole for the rudder stock before attaching the bulwarks, but since I'd only attached one, it wasn't too late, as it could just go over the edge of the support block. Unfortunately I lowered the drill press a little too much and left a rotary mark on the bottom of the hull. Maybe I can fix that with wood filler. Another problem with the starboard bulwark was I apparently failed to get the glue up to the bow midline. So now it's become a three-step process. I put a blob of glue where it should've been, pushed some into the crack with a pin, fitted, wiped off the excess and then set it up to press dry again. All this press fitting and drying is taking a long time because I don't want to take things apart until I'm completely sure they're dry. The port bulwark would be fitted just like the first, but I made the inlet slightly too deep. That meant that it wouldn't be properly seated and there would be a gap between the bulwark and deck, so I had to raise the opposing wall formed by one of the metal blocks to above the edge of the inlet. A pair of extended rails are added to match the raised quarterdeck. After looking at a few period examples again, I realized the slanted front edges I put in the original draft are incorrect and they should stick straight up. And here you can see step 1 of the obvious solution. Step 2 is in the works right now.
-
This design is my attempt at the smallest, simplest vessel of the early 18th century that would still plausibly have some of the features of a "ship" (deck, beak, square topsail, ratlines, etc.). At 1:128 scale it will represent a length of 45 feet from stem to stern, slightly longer than HMY Royal Escape. While I've scratchbuilt wood models in the past, they were almost all tiny and heavily simplified to the point of being abstract, and also had waterline hulls. This will be my first proper attempt with full hull, realistic rigging and other details. I've already had to alter some things from the initial draft. I used what I first thought was a plank of poplar. Don't ask why I thought that. It's obviously maple. (As you can see, I felt the need to add more gunports, even if it won't have that many guns.) This is the way we plank the deck, plank the deck, plank the deck... Upon finding that the rear of the deck was bowing upward in the middle, I added another vise. The soaked grain swells so that the planking requires some redefinition the next day. Because I'm not skilled enough to create perfectly straight lines, some setup is needed to keep the thingy flush against the front edge of the quarterdeck. Unfortunately, due to the deck's angle, I can't put an additional weight on top to keep it from bowing upward in the middle. At this point I started adding secondary lines for shaping the hull -- prematurely, because I only then realized it would be much, much easier to add certain other features while the bottom and sides were still flat. After further comparison with period images, I moved the mast hole back by just over 3/8 inch from where it's indicated on the plan and decided not to rake it. You can still see the tiny dent where I marked the drill spot as per the original plan. I used a graver to mark the ends of the deck planks. The nail holes didn't go so well, as the awl tended to make the basswood split. Inletting for the bulwarks. I will skip the guess-and-check process by which I figured out how to make the bulwarks and skip right to the outcome. I found the basswood splits when bent where there's runout, so what works is extra-wide strips with straight edges cut along the grain, shaped to match the inlet after drying. Here's where we stand right now. Fitting the lower edge to the inlet was surprisingly easy with a Dremel cutoff wheel and sandpaper. Problem now is I've never been on an 18th-century ship and don't know how high the bulwark should be, whether I should build it up or sand it down. Anyways, more to follow.
-
English fleets and small vessels in the early 1700s
Dan DSilva replied to Dan DSilva's topic in Nautical/Naval History
Hi again, Sorry I had to wander off for a while 'cause the spring university term is starting and I'm spending most of my time on required reading. Jerry, I downloaded a Kindle reader but the price appears to have shot up to $48 in the meanwhile, so it's looking like there may be print editions that'll be cheaper. druxey, thanks for the clarification. In that case I'll count the yacht and the hoy as different types of small vessel that both fit into my area of interest. Roger, thank you for the information and the offer. I've been doing a few plans inspired by the ones at RMG; probably going to aim for a single-master about the size of the Royal Escape but with a later period aesthetic more like the rebuilt Fubbs -- what I like about that sort of design is its features make it look like a minimized version of a full-sized ship.
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.