-
Posts
69 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Dan DSilva
-
Hello again, I've decided to aim for 1:128 scale for my Pequod and other sailing ships.. Before resorting to scratchbuilding the boats, I thought I'd look around at what was already on the market. The best that I've found so far are 25- and 27-foot Montagu whalers made by Quaycraft. Of course, these are not 19th-century whaleboats; their bows are less raked than what I've seen and they would require added oarlocks. https://quaycraft.uk/product/25ft-whaler/ https://quaycraft.uk/product/27ft-whaler/ The other option I know of are Amati's 65mm boats. I don't know what real-world model they represent, but I believe it's a more modern naval design. Their bows have a better shape than the Montagu, but their interiors would require more modification. https://www.cornwallmodelboats.co.uk/acatalog/4975-Whaleboat-65mm-A4975.html I would greatly appreciate if anyone knows other models out there.
-
Seems like about time for an update. Part 1 of glueing down the bulwark. Part 2, glueing down the back half. These blocks of layered brass and steel were given to me years and years ago by an uncle to use as anvils. I don't know what their original purpose was. I somehow fitted the starboard bulwark a little forward and pushed to the left. As a result it stuck slightly past the midline at the bow and had to be trimmed back. Once it was glued in place, the only practical way to trim it was with the Dremel, and because none of the Dremel bits can fit into the tiny angle between the deck and the hull, there was a little lump left there that I had to compensate for by grinding a pit into the corresponding spot on the port bulwark. The thingy that goes along the port side is just a leftover from making the bulwark, while the starboard one is cut down from my first attempt at a bulwark that turned out too low. I had no idea basswood contains tannin, so I didn't put tape on the vise while shaping the first one and now it's a little bit ebonized. Another unfortunate result of the imperfect fitting is that the back edge of the starboard bulwark falls slightly short of the stern while the port one sticks out a bit. Obviously I shouldn't have trimmed it to length before glueing it in place, but there's an obvious solution which you've probably already guessed. Realized that I should've drilled the hole for the rudder stock before attaching the bulwarks, but since I'd only attached one, it wasn't too late, as it could just go over the edge of the support block. Unfortunately I lowered the drill press a little too much and left a rotary mark on the bottom of the hull. Maybe I can fix that with wood filler. Another problem with the starboard bulwark was I apparently failed to get the glue up to the bow midline. So now it's become a three-step process. I put a blob of glue where it should've been, pushed some into the crack with a pin, fitted, wiped off the excess and then set it up to press dry again. All this press fitting and drying is taking a long time because I don't want to take things apart until I'm completely sure they're dry. The port bulwark would be fitted just like the first, but I made the inlet slightly too deep. That meant that it wouldn't be properly seated and there would be a gap between the bulwark and deck, so I had to raise the opposing wall formed by one of the metal blocks to above the edge of the inlet. A pair of extended rails are added to match the raised quarterdeck. After looking at a few period examples again, I realized the slanted front edges I put in the original draft are incorrect and they should stick straight up. And here you can see step 1 of the obvious solution. Step 2 is in the works right now.
-
This design is my attempt at the smallest, simplest vessel of the early 18th century that would still plausibly have some of the features of a "ship" (deck, beak, square topsail, ratlines, etc.). At 1:128 scale it will represent a length of 45 feet from stem to stern, slightly longer than HMY Royal Escape. While I've scratchbuilt wood models in the past, they were almost all tiny and heavily simplified to the point of being abstract, and also had waterline hulls. This will be my first proper attempt with full hull, realistic rigging and other details. I've already had to alter some things from the initial draft. I used what I first thought was a plank of poplar. Don't ask why I thought that. It's obviously maple. (As you can see, I felt the need to add more gunports, even if it won't have that many guns.) This is the way we plank the deck, plank the deck, plank the deck... Upon finding that the rear of the deck was bowing upward in the middle, I added another vise. The soaked grain swells so that the planking requires some redefinition the next day. Because I'm not skilled enough to create perfectly straight lines, some setup is needed to keep the thingy flush against the front edge of the quarterdeck. Unfortunately, due to the deck's angle, I can't put an additional weight on top to keep it from bowing upward in the middle. At this point I started adding secondary lines for shaping the hull -- prematurely, because I only then realized it would be much, much easier to add certain other features while the bottom and sides were still flat. After further comparison with period images, I moved the mast hole back by just over 3/8 inch from where it's indicated on the plan and decided not to rake it. You can still see the tiny dent where I marked the drill spot as per the original plan. I used a graver to mark the ends of the deck planks. The nail holes didn't go so well, as the awl tended to make the basswood split. Inletting for the bulwarks. I will skip the guess-and-check process by which I figured out how to make the bulwarks and skip right to the outcome. I found the basswood splits when bent where there's runout, so what works is extra-wide strips with straight edges cut along the grain, shaped to match the inlet after drying. Here's where we stand right now. Fitting the lower edge to the inlet was surprisingly easy with a Dremel cutoff wheel and sandpaper. Problem now is I've never been on an 18th-century ship and don't know how high the bulwark should be, whether I should build it up or sand it down. Anyways, more to follow.
-
English fleets and small vessels in the early 1700s
Dan DSilva replied to Dan DSilva's topic in Nautical/Naval History
Hi again, Sorry I had to wander off for a while 'cause the spring university term is starting and I'm spending most of my time on required reading. Jerry, I downloaded a Kindle reader but the price appears to have shot up to $48 in the meanwhile, so it's looking like there may be print editions that'll be cheaper. druxey, thanks for the clarification. In that case I'll count the yacht and the hoy as different types of small vessel that both fit into my area of interest. Roger, thank you for the information and the offer. I've been doing a few plans inspired by the ones at RMG; probably going to aim for a single-master about the size of the Royal Escape but with a later period aesthetic more like the rebuilt Fubbs -- what I like about that sort of design is its features make it look like a minimized version of a full-sized ship. -
English fleets and small vessels in the early 1700s
Dan DSilva replied to Dan DSilva's topic in Nautical/Naval History
Are the single-masted yachts technically hoys? -
English fleets and small vessels in the early 1700s
Dan DSilva replied to Dan DSilva's topic in Nautical/Naval History
Thanks, I'll take a look! -
English fleets and small vessels in the early 1700s
Dan DSilva replied to Dan DSilva's topic in Nautical/Naval History
I'm not sure... the boats look very similar, but the first painting is supposed to be at Calais and the second "in the Thames Estuary near Sheerness." Did I miss something in the file descriptions? -
English fleets and small vessels in the early 1700s
Dan DSilva replied to Dan DSilva's topic in Nautical/Naval History
I'm finding that a lot of ships of the kind in the paintings are referred to as royal yachts, but I don't know whether at that time that could describe a physical type or just its role. Royal Museums Greenwich says that they were normally ketch-rigged, so one with a single mast may have been privately owned and not a royal yacht. As for use, HMY Fubbs served in the Mediterranean several times during the War of the Spanish Succession; Mary was deployed to the Baltic in 1700, and William and Mary fought in the Battle of Malaga in 1704. So yeah, this kind of vessel was being sent a fair distance abroad and serving in battle fleets. -
Hello! I recently started on this sloop without having given proper thought to the place I wanted it to occupy in my collection and whether it was right for the period. So that's possibly some time lost. After consideration, I have the notion of eventually doing a few ships from a fleet or squadron from around 1700-1705, but I'd like to start relatively small and simple. A lot of paintings from the late 1600s-early 1700s show decked, armed, single-masted boats that look to be about as big as Bermuda sloops, like here and here, but I'm having trouble finding information about them. Would you see these little guys, or any vessels in that size range, accompanying men-of-war out at sea? If so, do you know where I can learn more about them? Also, are there any good general resources about the typical composition of English fleets when they were away from home at that time, with numbers of different warships and auxiliary vessels?
-
So, here's what I've wound up with: Scientific Bounty in approximately 1:120 scale. Got it cheap on eBay because it was partly assembled and there's a few missing or damaged pieces, though I don't think anything that can't be easily replaced. Also could use upgrades on top of modifications -- it doesn't even come with sails, for one. But I think it's an okay start.
-
Good catch; the reason I ask about common scales is because of course the Pequod isn't the only ship in the book, so if it winds up being 1:110 then maybe I'll get a Revell Morgan to sit alongside it on the shelf as the Rachel or something.
-
Thank you. A solid hull sounds like it'd be more suitable for a beginner. The Constructo 1:110 Bounty looks nice, if there are any available by the time I have enough money saved up, but I will look into a simpler learner's model in the meanwhile.
-
The New Bedford Whaling Museum replied. The Curator of Maritime History says that "claw-footed" means ship-rigged and sent some period illustrations. On the whole I think my idea about their appearance (smallish full-rigged ships with curved decks and partially closed bulwarks) being in the same vein as the Bounty isn't far off. Probably any small bluff-bowed three-master from that period would make an acceptable starting point. By the way, is any scale smaller than 1:100 particularly common for sailing ships, like how 20th-century warships are common in 1:350, 1:700, 1:1250, etc.?
-
Thank you. I'm e-mailing NHA right now and I'll look into the other two as well.
-
I recently had the idea to build my own Pequod out of a modified kit, and I was wondering if anyone had suggestions on which one to start with. I'm looking for a small wood kit. According to the novel, the Pequod is "rather small," "claw-footed," and more than 50 years old at a time "some years" before 1851. I don't know what "claw-footed" means, but I take it to have been built around the 1770s-1780s and be somewhat short of 100 feet overall. So do you know of anything suitable? The only 18th-century whaleship I've found on the market is Occre's Essex, which, although appropriate in more ways than one, is a lot larger than I have shelf or work space for. The other idea I had was to start with an HMS Bounty, which would mean buying or fabricating a lot of extra parts (which I'm willing to do -- if I have to).
-
I'm interested in making a wood model. I've assembled a lot of plastic kits, but this would be the first real wooden one I've done. So you recommend that, after background research, I start by asking for a kit recommendation in Wood model ship kits and then ask about the other topics in the appropriate subforums as they come up?
-
Hello, I'm seeking advice about a plan I have for the near future which involves heavily modifying a factory kit. My questions range from which model to choose, to which aftermarket accessories to add, how to fabricate parts, and which paints and finishes to use. Could you recommend to me which subforum(s) I should ask in? Thank you.
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.