Jump to content

rdsaplala

Members
  • Posts

    602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rdsaplala

  1. Thanks very much for your inputs, M., Tony, and Druxey, I appreciate it :)

     

    M., the excellent bashing you've done to your Pegasus kit has really inspired me to also improve my ship

     

    Toni, I've had a look at your HMS Atalanta build and I believe congratulations are in order, you're doing a marvelous job on your build Ma'am and I hope to someday build one of these beautiful fully framed Swan Class ships. I've been keeping tabs on Danny's build way back on the old logs up to now and he has been very kind to lend me a helping hand in my humble little ship. I will be keeping an eye on your masterpiece.

     

    Hi Druxey,

     

    Thanks  very much for chiming in and sharing your inputs, it's nice to hear from the Master of Swan Class ships ;)  

     

    I have resized the TFFM vol II plans to 1/64 and made a simplified mock up of the exposed portions of the mast partners based on my understanding of the texts and your explanation:

     

    IMG_20130226_194839_zps0454eb42.jpg

     

     

    I understand that the fore and aft edges of the cross chocks should pass underneath the head ledges of the fore and main hatch coamings, however to avoid the difficult work, I plan to just trim the fore and aft edges of the cross chocks and just let them butt tightly against the coamings as seen below:

     

    IMG_20130226_195814_zpsf43cd8d2.jpg

     

    Did I interpret the texts and plans correctly?

     

    One more thing that really bothers me is this NMM deck plan showing that the opening of the main mast partner is an octagonal shaped structure: 

    post-256-0-90324800-1361884143.jpg

     

     

    Does this mean that the plan reflects an "unfinished" mast partner, or would it be more accurate for my particular ship if I follow the contemporary plan and just go for an octagonal mast wedge as seen below?

     

    IMG_20130226_195951_zps9cd632e9.jpg

     

    Once again, your opinions would be much appreciated, and I apologize in advance if my questions may seem a bit silly, I'm just learning the ropes on these new nautical terms ;)

  2. Hi guys,

     

    I need some help from our Swan Class experts as well as our other members familiar with David Antscherl's TFFM series of books. 

     

    I've been reviewing the section on Fore and Main-Mast partners on the gun- /upper deck (TFFM Vol II, pp 61-63) and I'm interested in adding the exposed portions of these mast partners (i.e. the areas protruding above the deck planking) to my Pegasus kit.

     

    Below is the NMM upper deck plan of Pegasus showing the main mast partner encircled in red:

    post-256-0-03706800-1361800283.jpg

     

    Based on this, as well as the TFFM plans, I drew my four interpretations of this particular component:

     

    Drawing A shows the chocks (letters A to F) slightly higher than the deck planking and the mast wedges (G) slightly higher than the chocks and octagonal in shape:

    post-256-0-42132900-1361796921.jpg

     

    Drawing B has the same arrangement as A, except for the circular shaped mast wedges: 

    post-256-0-82098600-1361797388.jpg

     

     

    Drawing C  is similar to A, but includes the carlings (H and I) on each side among the components above the deck planking:

     

    post-256-0-95592600-1361798093.jpg

     

     

    Drawing D is similar to C, except for the circular shaped mast wedges: 

    post-256-0-24857300-1361798215.jpg

     

    I apologize in advance for the crude, ill-proportioned nature of my drawings, I think my 2 year old makes better shapes than me :P

     

    May I know if which of these 4 drawings is the most appropriate for Pegasus?

     

    Personally, I am leaning towards B since most of the scratchbuilt Swan Class ships I've seen show the carlings H and I to be lower/below the deck planking and both TFFM and Goodwin's  "Construction and Fitting..." book state that the octagonal shaped opening becomes rounded upon opening out or finishing of the mast partner. However, I am curious as to why the NMM plan shows an octagonal shaped opening for the mast wedge. Is this the finished shape of the mast wedge or did the plan intend to show how it looked like prior to opening out/finishing, hence the octagonal shape? 

     

    Thanks in advance for the help guys.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  3. Hi Aldo,

     

    Glad you've got your log back up and running.  Your planking work came out great...foul words and patience pay off in the end!  Thanks for your comment on my build.  Keep up the good work.

     

    Patrick

    Thanks Patrick, I just hope the foul words don't become a habit :D Thanks for dropping by as well as your kind comments, I appreciate it :)

  4. Wow Aldo!

    Neat planking!

    Redoing all that was worth it in the end.

    I would never have the patience to do the planking a second (third) time... 

     

    Bummer!

    Hello there, Bummer, my friend, thanks for the good word, I wouldn't have needed to do a "third" planking if I weren't such a hard headed gruff and used PVA from the start, as advised by other builders, this is something I plan to do for my MKII (HMS Fly). You made a good choice of planing to use PVA on Amphion, you won't regret it, mate ;)

×
×
  • Create New...