Jump to content
Supplies of the Ship Modeler's Handbook are running out. Get your copy NOW before they are gone! Click on photo to order. ×

Alvb

Members
  • Posts

    119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alvb

  1. I think the masts are too short and the tops are too big. I think they need to be redone.
  2. After a somewhat longer break, the mast builder has resumed his work and built the two fighting tops. (the masts are not yet completely fixed) I'm wondering where the men left the missing pavises lying around?
  3. I'm a bit skeptical. Why such an impractical route? First, somehow get to the bow, and then take this dangerous route to the next deck.
  4. What is the basis for the theory that the arches served as access? On the interpretation of these drawings? We know many illustrations that show how the arches merge onto the upper edge of the waist.
  5. Is there any evidence of what the hull and frame lines of older carracks looked like, around 1450 to 1470? And were there differences between English and Dutch carracks?
  6. @WaldemarThank you very much, basically its clear, but your drawings make it much easier to find the connecting arches.
  7. I meant the texts you and others have linked from time to time, not the posts in this forum.
  8. If only these texts were available in a precise German translation, how I would love to delve into them...
  9. The chainwales: No details are discernible in the Brueghel painting. Chainwales aren't even visible for the fore-shrouds. My interpretation: The main shrouds are attached to chainwales, while the fore-shrouds simply have their wales reinforced at the lower edges of the forecastle. Its bent side makes wide chainwales unnecessary. The shrouds still run freely from the side.
  10. I'm currently building a small model from roughly this era. I realized that the bow area doesn't match the visual impression Brueghel creates in his depiction of "Icarus." The design presented here, with its strongly curved breadth sweeps in the bow, comes closer to that. Therefore, I've taken the liberty of applying the presented method to my design. Thanks to your clear description, it's easy to transfer. Only the reconciling sweeps—circular segments that connect tangentially to given arcs—should be easy to find using graphical methods, but no! Could you perhaps briefly explain to me how to find these sweeps? Thank you very much.
  11. Wales (Is this the correct plural form?🙄) and Standarts in progress. In fact, I am not sure how to construct the railings with the shields on top of the castles.
  12. Thank you for your detailed explanations. I consider your work extremely valuable. The constructions are understandable and easy to follow. The only thing that wasn't entirely clear to me was how the regression curves were determined.
  13. I am just a little surprised that on the one hand people had experience with such stability problems and knew methods to mitigate them, but on the other hand they built ships with these very deficiencies.
  14. All cannons and swivel guns are now mounted in the aft fort, so the aft deck can be relocated. Next, we move on to the forefort.
  15. The first 18 guns in the aft fort have been mounted. Five stern guns are still missing.
  16. I have the same thing coming up, only 5 times smaller....
  17. Many small decks need to be installed! You can see inside from many places. Before the upper decks are glued on, I still have to fit the heavier guns. Once the interior work is complete, I'll continue outside...
  18. Thank you very much for the likes everyone. @Snug Harbor JohnnyYes, I could. But next I should maybe make a better version of the Brueghel.😂
×
×
  • Create New...