Jump to content

clloyd

Members
  • Content Count

    163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About clloyd

  • Birthday 02/18/1973

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Ireland

Recent Profile Visitors

914 profile views
  1. Arthur - now I realise the source of the confusion.... These..... are the cheeks on my mast. As you can see they go all the way down the side of the mast and the hoops do go under them , and the wooldings over. The wooden bands above and below the woolding are (and I've just looked up TFFM IV because I couldn't think of their name) aparently called woolding hoops (logically enough). Problem sorted. Brain no longer confused. And thanks for the compliment.... I'm enjoying doing the masts more than the hull at the moment. C
  2. Jason, My favourite alternative material - paper. That's a 250g tan coloured cardstock. Getting wood to be that thin and bent is a huge effort, and some people do that, but I'm not interested in that level of frustration. Similarly the hoops are black cardstock. At viewing distance you can't tell the difference. C
  3. Arthur Just so we are on the same page.... My mast has both hoops and wooldings. the hoops struturally are underneath the cheeks, and the wooldings wrapped around the whole lot. for placement and number I'm working off McKays drawings - and he works from Steele. Colin
  4. Thanks guys Arthur - the bands going under the cheeks aren't woodlings - they are the iron hoops that would have been put on a "made" mast to hold it together. These were put on before the the cheeks.... Then follows about 4 paragraphs describing how to make the cheeks, including hollows for the hoops. I have course have cheated and made something that looks right but is manufactured for ease of construction. Colin
  5. Tom, It's based on the original ship Colin
  6. Wefalck - thanks - acetone is not commonly in the house so that one hadn't even entered my thinking. Vossy - I'm aware of those products, but I'd much rather keep the natural brown patina it's developed by itself over the past couple of years, so I'm going to try and not have to go down the artificial road. Thanks Guys Colin
  7. The topic title pretty much states the question I just want to check with the people who have the experience or mettalurgy to guide me. I have left my copper plates to age with air exposure, with no particular concern about handling. Now I'm at the point that I'd like to seal the copper away and get it under a hard protective layer, but want to make sure there are no organic oils on it, but obviously I want to leave the patina intact. What could I use to take off any oils. I'm leaning towards isopropynol - a lightly damp cloth rubbed over copper. Any other options? Colin
  8. To further what David said - basically when you have only a tiny amount of paint on the brush and lightly brush it across a surface - the paint goes onto areas that are higher and stays out of recesses. This is a technique to highlight areas that may normally reflect more light. Colin
  9. Yes - the size of the block was proportional to the line going through it. Larger lines took more stress, so the strop holding the blocks needed to be as strong. You had me confused there too - you do mean eyebolt not deadeye? On the cap? Turning - who needs turning?! Sharp pencil, sharp chisel, some maths and sandpaper is all you need. The taper on the lower yard was to 3/7 it's width (before battens). per Lees: prior to 1773 deadeyes were used for the mizzen topmast stay. "About 1773 the deadeyes were replaced by thimbles...." so the CC diagrams would se
  10. Hi Jason, looking good. in response to your questions: 1: if a knot is out of the question then seizing is the way to go. If you are unsure about the strength, then two tricks I use are to pass the seizing through the line with a needle first - essentially sewing the line together before wrapping it tight, then flood the sieze with diluted white glue. Just out of interest which block to which deadeye? 2: though shalt not use dowels for masting This will also go to something I wanted to say about your yard. My experience is that CC tends to over dimension their masts and yar
  11. Further work! I got a calm sunny day - so got the chance to take her out and sand the upper hull - that job is 90% complete. I can still see a couple of places that need smoothing down a little more. I've been working on the interior (most of this is not glued or varnished - just placed for assessment). Shot racks mostly done. I ran out of 6lb shot, so need to get some more Jeer bits are well under way - the decorative bar at the top cost blood to make. after redoing the gunport height it's nice to see the trial gun sitting nicely in the port. Which gives
  12. Jason, It's a bit of working from first principles. We know from numerous sources that straight planking didn't start until well after this time so curved planking is the order of the day. Equally then we know that hooked plank ends rather than nibbling was the order of the day. The swan ships (built about the same time as Pandora) had top and butt planking under the guns for strength. There are rules for how the butts in the margin plank relate to the butts in the side planking (this is where my head began to hurt) We know well where the beams were. McKay uses a 5 butt shift,
  13. It continues to shape into a lovely build Jason. I'm with you on the ratlines. There is so much detail in one of these ships that things like that just don't stand out. Colin
×
×
  • Create New...