Siggi52
-
Posts
985 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Siggi52
-
Druxey, did you mean with that, that they are on both drums. They did't run in sync, I will say one drum has 5 and the other 6 whelps. So only one pawl will work. At most models you will see only the fore jeer capstan, on deck and with pawls. In my case it's the rear capstan and I read that there only the lover drum has pawel. That is what Doods & Moore wrote. Lavery ignores them and Goodwin goes strait from the ancient capstan over to the 1790 version with pawl rings. -
Hello Mark, for melting the pewter I would use a propane torch. You need only 270-300°C, that is't so much. I had a look where I buy my articles for casting and there the sell even a melting gear with esbit. I have an LEE "Precision Melter" Electric Pot with thermostat control. http://www.trackofthewolf.com/List/Item.aspx/1194/1 May be you have a shop near by who sells something like that. The small pellets in the picture are the Bismuth pellets. You should use 2% of them. I would use it, it makes the pewter harder and it should better forming. It's for the cannons may be not so necessary, but for buttons it is. Because the rubber forms are soft, if you press to hard the cannons will not be round. Mostly I use two small boards to prevent this, or cover the form with plaster as you could see in the picture. That is also what artist do with there forms. Before you look into your rubber form( with the master still inside), you cut away every part that hinders you to get it out of the plaster. Then you made, in this case, a two part plaster form. But if the rubber is hard enough, I think, it would't be necessary. The air vents I cut also after I have made the form. I wisch you good luck, Siggi
-
Hello again, I have a question about the pawls. I could't find any description or picture, at which place they where installed. Version 1, the one I prefer and Version 2 I would prefer the version 1, because here the pawls are closer to the drum and in rest they are supported by the partner. I think that is also the reason that say are so long. Not to hold the pawls like in version 2. But I'm not sure. The second question is, did the upper drum has also pawls? In one book I read no, but I could't find any passage that say yes. Only this picture of the for jeer capstan from the Bellona. I'm looking for the main/rear capstan. Many thanks in advance, Siggi
-
Hello, the capstan is ready! I think I must not explain the pictures, they say all. Regards, Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 15
-
-
I'm glad that I'm not the only one who is sometimes faster then it is good for the project No, I did't have such a machine. But once a friend asked me to cast coins for him. The smaller the projects, the harder they are to cast. So I build something I could put in my drill and then turning it at a slow speed and pour in the pewter. In the middle is the pouring sprout. When I made the speed faster, most of the pewter went out at the side and I had a lot to do, to remove it from the walls and all around me. I hope you understand what I mean, but my english. I think it would't be too hard to build something also for the cannons. But normally it would work as you have already done it. The bubbles are the great problem. If you stir to much, you have bubbles. If you stir lesser it will not harden evenly. Would you later cast with pewter or stay with this material? Pewter flows better, because its heavier. But also here you could have problems with bubbles. Keep trying, Siggi
-
Hello Mark, it looks great. Casting is always a guess what will come out. But keep trying. I know, sometimes it is frustrating. You would find pewter in every corner of my shop from casting with centrifugal force Did you forget the touch hole at the cannon? Regards, Siggi
-
Thank you Nils and Mark, precise workmanship is your domain Mark, I'm more for shortcuts. The barrel is't octagonal, it's 10 sided and the upper part 12 sided. For 5 and 6 whelps. I made the hole in the lower drumhead a little larger, so I could get it just over the barrel. Later with the help of glue and color you would't see it. Damn, now know it all Regards, Siggi
-
Hello, the capstan is growing. But now I have to pause, I hope for only a short time. The man in the saw pit are on strike. That means my circular saw needs repair. But here the newest pictures. The paint is't already dry, so new they are Regards, Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 15
-
-
Hello, thank you all for your kind words. Mark and Gary, unfortunately did't I have pictures making all these small things, but I post some extra pictures of these things. That was the see chest manufactory, I think I made them for the whole navy! Cups, dishes and buckets for food The drums. In this part of the ship live the soldiers. and all the other stuff, mostly for the cannons. Now I see that I have two water cisterns in the picture, a smaller bucket like these where for grenades. Today the sun is shining here, it's mostly a wonder after 14 days of rain and that was the opportunity to take pictures of the gun deck without neon light. So looks the red paint naturally. It did't look soo red. Best regards, Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 17
-
-
Hello, so I have the gun deck ready and it should't be longer for me. I have a lot respect for those who build the whole ship this way. With this I did't mean all the small things I build in, but the plain ship. These bent hanging knees where the hell. But for the next deck I will go an other way and set first the deck beam and then the cannons in. They where much in the way, but I'm learning The following pictures I made again with my iPhone. Here is the red color a little to red. In reality it's more brown as in the first picture. I think it's the light. The next thing to build would be the capstan. Regards, Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 22
-
-
Hello, just to show you that I'm hard working, here some pictures of the actual progress. It's harder then I thought, because you have to plan 3 steps in advance. After the ledges are installed you could't change nothing on deck. Regards, Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 17
-
-
Hello Mark, the bark is still in Greenwich. When I reread your question about what it's in that mold, it's the filling canal. You fill the cannon from the under side, so that the air could leaf to the top. Regards, Siggi
-
Mark, with that question you got me, or better my english. My translating program told me it's modeling clay, Plasticine or play dough. As children we had these things for modeling in all colors. I presst the cannons also in this material to make the under side of the form. Here I will make the upper side of the form. It's a good idea to put a stripe of paper around the wood form, then the cast silicon would't stick at the wood. The cannons at Chatham, but I would't make the red so red, better is the english red as you could see at Prince Frederick's bark in the NMM. Regards, Siggi
-
The bismuth makes the pewter harder, frost resistent and it should better cast. Here a picture of my cannon foundry Regards, Siggi
-
Really great workmanship, Mark. I could't do that in this quality. When I compared your plan with my cannons, I found a real big mistake I made. But only at the 32 pounders, all other cannons are ok. I made mine on a wood lathe where I normally made things 1:1, free hand and cast them then in pewter. I don't know why that happens and why I did't noticed it earlier. Now they have to do it as they are. Regards, Siggi
-
Good morning Mark, here it is now late afternoon, and I'm ready at the shipyard. But today I was lazy and did only some paint work and mix new red color. But to your question. You mean these two hatches The one aft goes to the Ladies hole and the one with the grating to the bred room. At the plan it looked so At the hatched to the bred room and forward to the aft magazine stairway is a rim drawn, but not to that of the ladies hole. So I thought that I made it this way. If you have to work there a cannon I think the rim would be in the way. I dont know if I'm right with this interpretation, but I hope Regards, Siggi
-
So, Christmas is over and the workers are back at the shipyard. Today I have installed the tiller. The next things would be to set in all the carlings and ledges in this part of the ship. Really difficult are the crocked hanging knees around the gun ports. Enjoy the pictures. Regards, Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 15
-
-
Hi Mark, James Doods & James Moore say in there book „Building the Wooden Fighting Ship" about this Bellona model: this model is particularly interesting because it shows that an innovation in the way the main wales were planked had been introduced by 1760. This method, known as anchor-stock waling.... And there I think they mixed up some things. According to Goodwin the anchor stock planking has even sides. The top and butt planking has uneven sides, but no hocks. Somewhere I read that this is named butt and hock, but I could't find it again. The 1780 Bellona model has a straight conventionally waling and for the Superbe they made only one thick plank as wale! I used the top and butt. Regards, Siggi
-
To the location of the trunnions I have a question. Did he say in witch direction the pendulous motion goes? If it goes down, as I would say, then it would be ok. That would press the cannon and carriage down at the deck and the cannon would not jump. A good example as it should not be, you could see here: http://vimeo.com/109787499 I wouldn't stay near that cannon. Yes, the powder would burn down continuously, but the most pressure is at the start, to get the cannon ball moving. When the bullet moves, the pressure releases the faster the ball moves and the walls of the cannons could be thinner. For example, the Brown Bess has at the breech a diameter of ~ 34 mm and at the muzzle only ~ 22 mm, the wall is here only 1,5 mm thick. Regards, Siggi
-
The plans are looking great, I'm waiting for the first ready cannon. They must look even greater! Don't worry about measurements, they had large tolerances in those times. For an example, the look plate of the Brown Bess musket had a quarter inch tolerance in length. Not two muskets where identical, because it was all made by hand. Regards, Siggi
-
The captain, the shipwright (me, I'm at the iconograph and not at the picture) and the crew wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2015 Meanwhile I'm ready with all these small items for the gun deck and start now with the hanging knees for the upper gun deck and installing the deck beams. Siggi
- 451 replies
-
- 11
-
-
Hello Mark, Lavery quoted in „The ship of the line II“ that sweeps with rollers where officially introduced in 1771. And because there is no one who knows exactly how it was done (as you could see, no answers), I have to do it as I think it was done. I would do the sweep like version 2 and the tiller rope like version 1 and 3. But at the moment I got a cold and so I'm not at the shipyard working. So it is some time to think it over and search for more information. For the cabins at the gun deck there is a discussion at this threat: http://modelshipworld.com/index.php/topic/8770-thinking-things-throu-the-gunroom-gunner´s-room/ My question is't answered there, but I think that I will build all these cabins in canvas. Lavery is not always wrong, but he had the same problems with these things like we have. May be he had better sources than we. I'm doing reenactment now for over 40 years and learned that the ordinary things where'd written down, because at those times every one knows how it was done. I think that these cabins where not for living, but more for a little privacy at night and may be a little bureau work. Regards, Siggi
-
Hello Daniel, no, that is the plan of the upper gun deck. I use this plan to plan the sweep for the tiller under the beams of this deck. At the gun deck the cabins are between the cannons. May be this plan will help: http://collections.rmg.co.uk/collections/objects/86584.html Here you could see that there are two cannons between the cabins, as in my plan and then the sweep and tiller ropes come not in conflict with the cabins. Regards, Siggi
-
Hello Daniel, I'm working with my Dragon at the same problem. I think your cabins are to far to the middle of the ship. If you make them shorter you wouldn't have the problem with the tiller. Ok, you have an other tiller system. The right cabin would be approximately 2x2 m at my plan, enough for a cod and may be a table and chair. At the plans of the NMM the cabin are approximately 1/5 of the width of the ship at these places. So they are shorter than the cannons. Regards, Siggi
-
Hello, before I continue my work at the gun deck, I have some questions about the tiller. The tiller with roller I learned wasn't used in the 1760 th. But how looked the tiller and sweep in those times. From the Bellona book and deck plans in the NMM I came to this version. I hope I'm right. Here the question is how the sweep or quadrant looks in profile, version 1 ore 2? Version 2 is the older version according to Mr Goodwin. The next question, in picture 2 is, how was the rigging done? Did they have in the 60 th already the tensioning tackle, version 1 or did they used version 2 or 3? A last question about the cabins in the back of the gun deck. Green in picture 1. I would do them in canvas, not stretched on frames. But I found plans, not only one, where it looks as if the where from a solid construction. May be it's only the drawer who preferred clear lines. Many thanks in advance, Siggi
Our Emblem ®
