Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Deciding what ship to build is never easy. Having finished Agamemnon, I considered a three-decker, but they do look rather clumsy to me, and the prospect of quite so many gunports was off-putting. So, though I was briefly tempted, I decided not to go for Royal William. That figurehead with two horses was just too much. An eighteenth-century ship seemed the best answer, though for reasons  which may not be clear to readers of this blog, there are some who might expect me to try a medieval ship, say the Christopher which took Edward III abroad in the late 1330s, with a crew of 103 sailors. But, of course, there are no details of the ship herself, so that was out of the question. Nor are the building accounts for Edward’s Philippa any use, though they provide evidence to fuel arguments about the size of her sail. Centurion was tempting, for there are plans in the National Maritime Museum, and good photographs of the model made for Anson, who commanded her on the famous circumnavigation. I did make a model of an early eighteenth-century two decker back in the late 1950’s, based on a model in the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford, which is now residing in my daughter’s attic, but I don’t believe that I will be repeating myself. So, Centurion it is.

 

There will be problems, particularly with the decoration, but there’s no point in attempting a model that does not present challenges. I’m intending to build the hull using the bread-and-butter method. This does not seem to be much in vogue these days, but it is how models were made in the early eighteenth century (the so-called Georgian style). The open-framed Navy Board style would be difficult with a small model, and is anyway beyond me. My bible in my youth was Barrot de Gaillard’s Construisez des Modeles Réuoits de Marine, which advocated bread-and-butter, and it’s still the method I prefer. Bulkheads would of course be possible, but that method would probably demand double planking, though in my youth I did try layers of sticky brown paper on one model, which worked well, and still looks fine. As for making a fully framed model, that would be beyond me.

 

The plans in the National Maritime Museum present something of a difficulty, for there are two, and they are not quite the same. It may be that one was drawn up prior to building the vessel, and the other represents the ship as built. Or, possibly, the latter was drawn to assist Benjamin Slade, when he made the model that was presented to Anson himself. It seems to me posssible that it shows the ship following her refit in 1739 prior to the famous circumnavigation. The first is noted on the back as being for ‘A 60 gun ship’, while the second has Centurion named. I’ll make use of both, but  have for the most part used the earlier plan. The issue is discussed elsewhere on this site, at https://modelshipworld.com/topic/37674-centurion-of-1732/#comment-1078072 .  The NMM also has a plan of the stern, catalogued as being of Centurion 1732. It resembles the stern as depicted in the later plan, but not the way the model has it. 

 

So, here’s the start. Note that the scale is 1:160, so the model will be about a foot in length. It all looks very primitive in the early stages, but there seemed little point in trying to fabricate the keel as one would have to do with, say, a scale of 1:48 as used by the craftsmen who built such splendid models in the 18th century. The wood for the bread-and-butter slices is balsa, and I dare say that choice will not meet with much approval. But it is easy to work, and does not warp, twist, expand or contract, at least to judge by the way the models I made in the late 1950s have lasted.P1070031.thumb.JPG.1799e3eb6db7edd3d4946d7cc1ba3be8.JPG

 

The next photo shows initial progress, with just a couple of templates I’ve used to check that the model follows the plan reasonably closely. I’ve tried something new for me, Barrot de Gaillard’s method of making gunports. It does ensure that they are all lined up correctly. He was a little concerned that the sheer meant that the rectangular blocks were not quite vertical at the bow and stern, but that’s easily remedied by making the blocks less than absolutely square. I’ve not decided whether to have the gunports, at least the lower ones, open or closed, but that decision can wait. I think that these gunports are too small for it to be worth lining them, though it would make them neater.P1070040.thumb.JPG.3dcff00ca4c467ac54ae237ec885d77d.JPG

 

Next is another view, showing deck beams installed. There is a long way to go. 

P1070045.JPG

  • The title was changed to HMS Centurion 1732 by Michael P - scale 1:160

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...