Jump to content

kirill4

Members
  • Posts

    807
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kirill4

  1. You are wellcome,

    As You can see, there are about 17 pcs of rigging lines only ,necessary for operating of each square sail( main course at least)... they just are duplicated or "triplicated" on the drawing depends on how many sail has our model... just one time need to spend some time and study them( at least for one sail) and than You will have clear understanding what 's going on on the rigging plan for any of Your models in the future , but not like just a set of  unknown digits on the plan but as sertain name of each rigging lines.

    All the best!

    Kirill.

  2.  

    Good day Dave,

     Reading this book You will have clear understanding of the mames and functioning of each of the righing lines which were in use on the vessel of late 16th and most of the17th centuries, but there are no  exact rigging plans or belaying points location chart in this book ...

     he gives just approx  rigging lines locations, he mentioned traditional places where it could be most logically placed based on his studies of historic sources and museum models...

     If this rigging plan in the kit not clear , or some points are not clear , You could use any other conventional  galleon's models rigging plan together with information from RC Anderson book ... there are a few of them which were made on high professional level ... and actually all of them are very similar to each other :),

     reading Anderson book and at the same time  studying carefully any of those plans You will see how they exactly follow Anderson's guides...

     At least You could use riging plans of Cor Emke / Ab Hoving, museum Vasa 's rigging plan, Mondfeld 's rigging plan of Golden Hind model, anatomy of Susan Constant or recently developed model of Golden Hind ( based on Aker's reconstruction)and its rigging plan by Eugen Troppmann...

    Ps

    As variant both of these ring bolts for securing standing parts of top sail tie halliard could be located on the port and sb sides infront of each other, one on each side...they could be fitted on deck near waterways or on vertical timbers of the railings ... or both of them on one side, but I prefer to see them located on both sides as described by Anderson...

    All the best !

    Kirill

     

     

     

    Screenshot_20240501_003253_Samsung Notes.jpg

    Plan-4.jpg

    002.jpg

    Screenshot_20240501_004217_Samsung Notes.jpg

    Screenshot_20240501_004409_Samsung Notes.jpg

    Screenshot_20240501_004432_Samsung Notes.jpg

    Screenshot_20240501_004501_Samsung Notes.jpg

    6_b riggfästen mm.pdf 7_b rigg rekons.pdf Golden Hind-T4A3.pdf

  3. Good day,

    It looks like this is topsail tie  23 and another lines near by, a little bit to the aft , it looks like running backstays / no poz.N.

    There is a perfect book written by RC Anderson-  gives all ( almost all :)) unswers on galleon rigging questions... highly recommended...

    Ps

    This fall / runner( 24) couldn't be run bellow deck level, just secure it in suitable,convenient place in the waist area...

    Most probably, these two rings 25 shown on your drwng at one place,phisicaly are fitted on both sides on deck and need to be used for securing standing parts of this 23  topsail tie , one ring located  on ps - used for securing standing part of the runner, and another ring placed on sbs,used  for securing standing part of the halliard ,running part of the halliard 25 could be secured on the railing near by of its standing part.

    Screenshot_20240430_075942_Gallery.jpg

    Screenshot_20240430_080243_Gallery.jpg

    Screenshot_20240430_080314_Gallery.jpg

  4.  

    Good day Michael,

    What a microscopic parts!!! :))) Looks very readable + work of imagination and I could say in this scale You made it pretty,pretty good!

    One of the option , if I may to suggest, these guns gears could be ommited at all as they often performed ommited on classic museum models of thus period...where scematic gun cariages( even w/o wheels) shown  only... there will be some kind of "hermetic " message for those  of us who are  involved in this business :)))...

    but from other side -  when all shown, it is demonstration of your  highest modelling skills, if You want to show them in modern style! - as all gears settl ed 

    All the best ! 

    Kirill

  5. Good day,

    Dear Rick,

    Very clean ,precision  and accurate job done!

    Those "access" boards shown on the beackhead, are they kit's idea?

    Looks quite unusual, as far as I knew, there used to be a full grating deck, often shown in special form of long strips with wide opened cells ( as I understood for easy passing water in/out in rough seas) instead of shape of gratings which used on decks, for these may be sence to fabricate them from scratch?

    and there used to be placed a couple of crew's "seats of ease" , in the corners...  ?

    All the best!

    Kirill

    Some pctrs of Willem Barents replica ship , constructions mentioned above

    Screenshot_20240422_063753_Gallery.jpg

    Screenshot_20240422_063725_Gallery.jpg

  6. Good day

    Dear Dave,

    Oh, if Your managed to purchase it , its ok ...

    I think You will be good impressed by reading this book...there is very good historical research background  and detailed description of 16/ early 17th century galleon replica construction made by real naval engineer, and there are articles about two more vessels of MF period and sets of appendics with drawings and tables of rigging elements and all rigging lines with all names of each rope and  sizes used on MF replica is given in separate article !!!

    By my opinion these 3 books "MF and other colonial vessels", "The Galleon ..." by Peter Kirsch, and " Rigging of the vessel in the day ..." by RC Anderson could be considered as "Must Have " especially when busy with making some of  galleon model... :)))

    All The Best!

    Kirill

  7. Good day ,

    Dear Bruma,

    Indeed, Your Cutty Sark ,with current sails configuration-  the thack on the windward - looks fantastically cool!!!

    Agree with Your " tend not to use models or painting as reference" as the right way! ...

    this is just my "specific" if I could say that, to relay more on the old paintings or museum models as reference due to no other sources of info  for making galleons model :)))

    but this is not the case for the modern sailing vessel such as CS , when there are much more relaible source of information.

    Thanks for posting this collection of images of real vessels.

  8. Good day,

    Dear Bob,

    She Looks very nice,  it is very accurate job!, I like it very much !!!

    However I have some doubts/remarks regarding thickness of the stays and other standing riggings proportional rigging ... how did You calculate them? Thickness of the standing rigging? It shouldn't be the same as thickness of the shrouds?

    Main stay is the biggest one on the vessel ,exept perhabs anchor rope , all other standing riggings should be proportional less in sizes.

    There are a few perfect  exell tabels , free download,  easy to calculate thickness of all standing and running riggings depends on diam. Of main mast...

    Another question - securing/ lashing of the boat on deck and how it is positionedcon deck , is a little be doubdfull how You made it, it should be placed upside down from current position and lashing should be passed from side to side, but not crossed  from side to side as You shown...It never be done like this on the vessel :)... I don't know why many times we could see this wrong way of securing boat on deck made by our colleques ... it is absolutely wrong way to do it like this:)

    I noted spaces between deadeyes looks too short... norm it should be spaced approx 2-3 -or even 4 times of  deadeyes diam... all those small but devil important details very nicely and clear explained in R.C.Anderson book of 17th vessels  rigging... do You have it under your hand? If not,  I would be strongly advised to download this priceless book , there is all and even more, we need for building galleon models rigging and models of 17th century ships rigging..

    I meant, regarding all said above, it is matter if we would like to make some historic accurate job and make some improvents to the kit we are working with, but it is just my private point of vew, and if You don't agree and have your ownn ideas how things should be performed,  just discard all I said above :)

    Wish all the best!

    Kirill

  9. Good day,

    Dear Bruma,

    I have a few pictures of Fl.Cloud model, maybe You will find some idea for configuration / positioning sails on your model... as far as I could see, on this model ,choosed the case when both tacks and sheets of main/ lower courses looks tight at the same time...?!

    And position of the yards looks similar to your model yards position...on your model maybe You shown some" excessive "bellies" of lower sails?

    Agree ,on the model, it looks "strange" if try to 100% tight and secure fore tack on the cathead...but when compare to Campbell drawings everything should be ok...

    hm,strange... are the geometry of the kit model ,such as length of the yards,masts positions, size of the sails mutch the dimensions on the Campbells drawings of KS ?

    maybe on the kit model yards shorter than it should be?

    Or angle of the yards turn is not sufficient?

    At least, maybe there is sence to choose compromise variant  when and yards sharp turned but and sails corner positioned in such way when both tacks and sheets looks tight?

    14-9113949-antonio-jacobsen.jpg

    0039.jpg

    0040.jpg

    20180319_191054.jpg

    B12134.jpg

    C2761.jpg

    C2762.jpg

    C2764.jpg

    E5255CR-d1.jpg

    SL29987.jpg

    SL29988.jpg

    SL29989.jpg

    SL29990.jpg

  10. Good day Michael,

    Oh, I see now how it will be done ... fully agree with Your version,

    however on the engraving it looks like passing by sb side of the fore mast...

    but as always there could be a few variants of the same value and I believe that Anderson's opinion ,in case of some doubts, has more weight for making final desicion ! :)))

     

    Interesting, is there knee could be made with a kind of a hook( as it could be suggested from that engravings posted above) or there should be hole in the knee as You shown...?

    On these drawings some decorative element bellow knee figure could be seen- decorative part of the knee front part/ or hook? 

    Main stay collar branches crossed outside beakhead-bulkhead on the VdV drawing?

     

    sos stay collar 01.jpg

  11.  

    Good day Michael ...

    This is very interesting  as a kind of "theory" question... :), how to run main stay and its collar...

    I have some doubts , when looking at your  pictures and compare it with this famous engraving, how this unit arrangement could be looks like ...

    main stay , as far as I could understand question , it needs to be run on  sbs of fore mast, for this period ,

    if agree with this asamption , than falls of fore yard need to be run on ps - to avoid crossing these lines each other? but You already made opening in the deck for fore yard  fall on the sbs as well...?

     Maybe, it should be looks like as it is arranged on Vasa? or on this model as example... but unfortunately I don't  have more "fully explained"  pictures ... and in this book they didn't posted pictures how fore yard falls run...?

    As allways - All the Best!

    ps

    Do You have any other "proof" pictures of this arrangements? how main stay runs fore mast and secured "special edition" for SOS? may be good pictures of other professional/museum  made models ?

    Kirill

    01.jpg

    02.jpg

    03.jpg

    SOS.JPG

  12. On 1/23/2024 at 11:22 AM, Bruma said:

     

    Thank you all for your comments and likes! 

    I really appreciate all of them.  
    And please, if you see something wrong, strange or missing, do not hesitate to point it out! 

     

     

    Thank you, John, for helping me again, just to be clear: do you mean the pin on the main rail, port and starboard, or the fife rail at the mast foot?
    I'm tempted for the first answer, but the fife rail seems better for avoiding interference on the walkways... 
    Thank you again!

    Good day,

    Dear Bruma,

    Great job!  

    I never tire of admiring it, I look at it with pleasure every time!  looks very cool!  

    I have some doubts about whether the tension of some rigging of the lower sails is shown correctly in this scenario of the position of the yards...

     would it be more logical to see tight tacks and loosened sheets on the windward side and vice versa on the leeward side of the main sails ...? Clews of the windward side of main sails pointed aft maybe looks a little strange ? 

    I meant it should be looks like this ...?

     

     

    Screenshot_20240310_205209_Gallery.jpg

    Screenshot_20240310_205735_Gallery.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...