Jump to content

amateur

Members
  • Posts

    3,438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by amateur

  1. It's Dutch, I'm almost sure. Some island-hopping working boat in the east? Jan
  2. cont. I checked the foto's in the Winter book of the zweidecker: they do not follow the height/width rule by Van IJk, they are slightly wider than high, but there is certainly not a quarter difference... Also, the drawings suggest that there is no strict 1/3-1/3-1/3 division of the distance between the decks: the port dimension is roughly 1/3 of the distance, but is placed slightly lower than Van IJk suggests. The ports in the zweidecker seem to follow (more or less), the 'rule' that gunports of higher decks are 25% smaller than those of the deck below. Jan
  3. Rules, hmmmm, perhaps you're asking too much here.... Van Ijk pg 61 is not on the dimension of the gunports, it is on the dimension of the stern. He calulates the dimension of the length of the stern, as the sum of all separate parts. pg 65 is on the dimension of the ports in the transom. Problem there: he just states that the ports are square, and about as far from the stern as they are wide. No dimensions at all. On page 92 he is making a small remark on the gunport sils, not on the dimension What you are looking for is on page 117, but that is as unclear as the remainder of the tekst on the gunports I read it as: the gunports are high one third of the distance between the decks measured at the main mast. The distance between the deck and the lower sill is one third, and the distance between the (lower end of the) upper sill and the deck is one third. When the distance between the decks is more or less (goning to the aft or to the front of the ship), this only has an effect of the distance between the upper sill and the deck above, otherwise not all guns would fit at all ports. The width of the ports is one fourth more than the height of the port (btw this differs from Witsen, stating that gunports are higher than their width) Their position in the hull should be such that there is a even distance, but all structural parts can be placed to have maximum strength, and none of the knees have to be removed in order to place the gunports. (gunports were only made into the hull after planking the outside and installing the deck beams) NB: Van IJk states at page 61 the distance at the Verdek, as 6ft in the first, and 6ft9 in the second example, which gives him the port dimension of 2' and 2'3" in the two caluclations. The gunports on the deck above, can be one fourth smaller than those of the main gundeck. Their distance should be roughly equal to those on the main gundeck (otherwise the hull may be weakened) There is no remark on gunports at the other decks whatsoever in the book. Hope this helps Jan
  4. That didn't take you too long... It is Indrapoera. One of the ships of the Rotterdamsche Lloyd, build for the regular trips to the east. Jan
  5. Next one: completely different type of ship Jan
  6. going to mention them all: HMS Warspite Jan
  7. HMS Conway?
  8. btw the sub is called hook and ladder Jan
  9. is/was it wawona? (the ship, not the sub ofcourse) Jan
  10. is it victory chimes?
  11. Good morning? she's at the end of her working day at the moment OK, and now looking for three masted floating things. Jan
  12. How on earth did you find that one? just google ship, and looking at all two masted things?? Jan
  13. By its looks a fairly standard two-masted schooner.... Not much of a clue in the background either Jan
  14. boats, ships, floating or submerging things, sorry guys, I didn't want to offend anyone by my choice of words Jan
  15. Oh, now I see, It's the base for the upperstructure... That changes my question: why didn't you use this 'upward extension' over the full length of the ship? Jan
  16. Hi Piet, I'm a bit strugling: most frames suggest a normal 'tube-like' hull, but the aft frames have an upward extension: what is that for? I can see them on the frames-layout, but I can't relate them to the pictures of the sub itself.... Jan
  17. I used to be an addict to this game since 2009 Jan
  18. Next guess: HMS Bacchante (1876) iron screw corvette black hull straight bow white upper line along the deck three masted, fully rigged Jan
  19. Grrrr. now I have to go through all the HMS screw sloops or perhaps also the corvettes. I'm sure it is one of those late 1880/90's three masted, fully rigged and an (from this perspective invisible) funnel. Jan
  20. Without checking: HMS Dolphin? Jan
  21. I think the how-to is in the first pic. Looks so simple, but...... Jan
  22. Yes, for gold, yellow may be a better choice as a base. Jan
  23. Seen any useless tools around lately? or perhaps: seen from the positive: any very usefull tools?? Jan
  24. Warping seems to be you major problem in this stage..... She's going to be a large ship. unless, you're much smaller than I think ( ), your model is quite a bit larger than I expected. I exepected it to be around a meter length or so.... I once saw a buildlog of someone filling in all the spaces between the bulkheads with some kind of isolationfoam, to make an even surface, and make the forming and planking of the hull easier, without increasing much to the weight of the sub. Jan
×
×
  • Create New...