Jump to content

NAZGÛL

Members
  • Posts

    1,365
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NAZGÛL

  1. Thank you so much Frank, Lawrence and mobbsie!

     

    Andy, the gunports location is on the big 1:1 plan. If you like me want to try to make their locations more wonky and irregular, look at reference off the real ship, the official plans and of the 1:10. If I remember correctly the BB has a few gunports missing on their setup.

     

    Will you replace the kits fake gunports with open ones? (Recommended)

     

     

    /Matti

  2. Cheers Louie and Mark! Yeah, you're right, Mark, as long as they would be "usable for climbing" you should have some degree of freedom. I started out with an estimation, but as soon as I started felt that I needed to just do them by eye to try to control the look and how the lines aligned to eachother.  

     

    Thanks again for the likes, everybody!

     

    /Matti

  3. Hey all! Ok so I made the ratlines for the starboard side of the mainmast. Lots of beginner misstakes, but it was quite enjoyable work. To be honest shaping the dead eyes and metal parts for them was more challenging on the nerves as there where many stages. Once these are on you have a result. I like that as it gives energy to continue. I decided to do not go by a template, but did them freehand, by the eye and tried to look at the reference instead. I did end up with more rows then the original at the museum.

     

    I still need to weather the ratlines and give a light coat of varnish to hide the CA but this is where Ï'm at now.

     

    post-3739-0-48943400-1413575813_thumb.jpg

     

    post-3739-0-33066000-1413575823_thumb.jpg

     

    post-3739-0-74650800-1413575832_thumb.jpg

     

    post-3739-0-55915500-1413575841_thumb.jpg

     

    post-3739-0-88062200-1413575851_thumb.jpg

     

     

    /Matti

  4. Yeah, I did Jan. But after testing CA, I felt it worked well for me, as I felt I can shape it pretty well with it. I've used CA for a long time and actually haven't had any problem with it going fragile with time on the older models or stuff I used it on. I even used it when making the strings (basically the same material as this thread) for my sons homemade toy crossbows and bows, and as long as it isn't in a straight bend, it works well, they shoot them alot and the strings still hold up well.

     

    Considering how fragile the model is alltogether, I plan to not let anything on it to be touched. :D

     

    Thanks for your input though!

     

     

    /Matti

  5. Thanks for the suggestion Steve! Yeah I found a thread here suggesting that. I'm pretty sure I would mess up the shrouds with that method. And for me its something of an aesthetic decision, like adding nails to the hull or not. Or not adding any chaulking between the weatherdeck planks. 

     

    I don't really agree that you would not see any knots where the ratlines cross the shrouds. I see it even on smaller reference pics.

     

    post-3739-0-28875300-1413374357_thumb.jpg

     

    I do agree that the knots in this scale are slightly to big, but I prefer that to no knots. I hope to get a glose color match between the shrouds and the ratlines and that this would make the knots less prominent.

     

     

    Cheers!

     

    /Matti

  6. Ah, Just me reading your post all wrong Keith! I read ratlines, long day today. I was wondering about the ratline thickness earlier, and I guess thats why I read wrong. The rope is the same (not as the mizzen that I gave thinner shrouds), but unpainted on the plank.

     

    I bought many different thicknesses, and judge the rope thickness by eye compaired to reference or what look I prefer.

     

     

    /Matti

×
×
  • Create New...