Jump to content

ausf

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ausf

  1. 37 minutes ago, Jim Lad said:

    Tubes work very well for macro photography.  Their main disadvantage is that they have a very narrow fixed focus range which makes them a bit tricky to use on moving subjects such as insects.  The depth of field can be vastly improved by 'focus stacking' - taking a series of images at different focus depths and then combining the images in a photo processing programme.

     

    John

    Great points John, thanks.

     

    I will definitely look into focus stacking when I use these for actual projects. 

     

  2. 37 minutes ago, kurtvd19 said:

    And with digital photography you see immediately if the exposure was good or not - no need to figure the exposure factor for the tube or tubes used.

     

    You got that right. Camera was hooked up to the Macbook and done live view so I could change shutter speed and ISO (can't adjust f stop with the manual lens) and adjust before taking anything. 

     

    I try to explain to my kids that I had to wait a week for a roll of film to come back before you found out if you even captured anything. 

  3. I'm been meaning to get a good macro lens for years, but every time I'd hate to drop serious coin on it.

     

    I decided to give extension tubes a go. They're a cheap alternative so I kind of assumed would give cheap results. I'm pretty surprised how well they work.

     

    Using an entry level Canon Rebel and a $40 Nikkor-P vintage lens I got for animation, I put the tubes to the test. I bought a set of Kenko, 3 tubes of 12, 20 and 36mm that were cheaper than one Canon branded tube. The idea behind them is they create more distance between the sensor and the back of the lens, allowing you to get closer to the subject. In theory, if you use 50mm or extension with a 50mm lens, it's basically like having the object touching the sensor. I also tried the 50mm lens that came with the Rebel. 

     

    I grabbed a 1/35 Tamiya styrene head I started but never finished. It was laying in the bottom of the spares drawer, covered it dust and scratched up pretty good, please excuse that. 

     

    It's lit with my bench work lamp (Ikea), simple LED bulb, no fancy light rig. 

     

    First photo was the Nikkor 55 mm lens with 12mm of extension.

     

    p1.thumb.jpg.be2feed77d2ab700881a6272eb1c5fab.jpg

     

    Next is the same lens with all the tubes attached. It destroys the depth of field, but the magnification is pretty damn good, especially for a 50 year old, cheap lens. 

     

    p2.thumb.jpg.449aebe9ac9579065ee467b470960e0e.jpg

     

    And finally, the basic Canon 18-50mm lens with all the tubes in place.

     

    p3.thumb.jpg.a3f1a85cecbcbb2618126b0bca7188f6.jpg

     

     

    So, no need to get crazy if you want to take closeups of your work. 

  4. 21 minutes ago, Duanelaker said:

    1972 Chevelle Malibu, I’ve had it for 20 years now and have restored it as a novice.  10 footer for sure, but I did put a 5-speed in it 

    My first glance I thought Chevelle, but from the angle it looked late 60s  boxy and those Chevelles had a single taillight. 

     

    I had my Holy Grail, a 66 Malibu ragtop, but the frame was cracked. I intended to do a rails up restoration but never had the money when I had the time and then when I had the money, I had no time. It sat in a garage for about 5 years until I parted it out. 

     

    I bought it in NJ. When looking it over I saw welded plates on the drivers side frame all covered in undercoating. All of those frames rotted in the same spot, even the later ones, so I didn't think it was a big deal. When I was leaving the guy kept telling me to be careful, don't go too fast, claiming he was worried I'd get pulled over without registration/insurance, etc. But as I'm driving home, on the bridge it was handling weird and when I got it home, my buddy who drove me there said he saw the car flexing in the middle. Then I saw the break when I got it on a lift. My original plan was to drive it while working on it, but that put the cabash on it and made the resto way more than I intended.  

     

    I actually still have the grill emblems and SS flags in the basement. 

     

  5. 7 hours ago, Louie da fly said:

    Welcome to MSW, Jeff!

     

    That sounds like a very interesting project. I built the Airfix Vasa about 50 years ago; I don't know if the kit has changed since then, but certainly a lot has been discovered about the ship itself in the interim. There are several wooden builds of the Vasa on MSW - if you use the search function (top right of this page)  you should find them. Some are phenomenally good, and several incorporate a lot of the most up to date information on that beautiful ship, which may be of use to you.

     

    I'd recommend you start a build log and share your experiences with the rest of us. It's also a great way to get help and advice from the friendly and experienced builders here. Though you'll be doing a fair bit of scratch work on this, it probably qualifies best as a kit build - but bashed to make it better; something quite a few members do. The instructions are here:

     

    Good to have you with us.

     

    Steven

    Thanks Steven!

     

    The kit is the recent re re re release, it's the same old mold. After I started to amass the refs, I thought about just scrapping that and going wood, but I think it'll be a good test bed on rigging, etc. 

     

    I certainly will start a thread, I'm all about sharing work and taking criticism and input. No ego here, I'd rather not reinvent the wheel when many of you could easily point out one of the many mistakes I'm about to make.

     

    First up I'll be making the cannons, deadeyes and anything else that the kit lacks in detail. Not sure if you guys would be interested in the process of resin casting, but I'll document if you'd like.

     

     

  6. 13 hours ago, Nirvana said:

    Jeff, :722972270:

    You have just entered a fantastic world with the most brilliant builder and helper available.

     

    Again, warm welcome, or we say in Sweden, Varmt Välkommen!

    Tack Per!

     

    My son is trying to get an internship in Finland for the summer, if so, he plans on stopping in Sweden for visit and meet family. If you see a confused American with a Huginn and Muninn tattoo, say hi.  

  7. Hello all, thanks for opening the door to me.

     

    I'm not a stranger to models, I started in 1970 and besides the normal hiatus from building while in college, etc. I've been active in the craft in some form or another all these years. Currently, I'm a sculptor but previously had a business that made model related tools. My business partner was an avid ship builder and built and sold ropewalks. 

     

    My youngest son is in his second year at Webb, working on dual degrees in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. He had to do a report on design failures and being that we are Swedes, chose the Vasa. It seemed like the best time to get my feet wet and scratch the ship building itch I've had as long as I can remember.

     

    I'm going easy at first, to learn the ropes (literally and figuratively), starting with the Airfix styrene kit. I plan on quite a bit of scratchbuilding, using my sculpting and resin casting experience to upgrade some of the kit's shortcomings and flesh out detail.

     

    As usual, I have gathered a small library of ref material on it: copies of Architectura Navalis, Young Sea Officer's Sheet Anchor, Ship Model Builder's Asst as well as general Vasa books. 

     

    I'm looking forward to drooling over your collective work as well as picking your brains as I go forward.

     

    Jeff

     

×
×
  • Create New...