Jump to content

ClipperFan

NRG Member
  • Posts

    1,960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ClipperFan

  1. druxey, Good observation. At least it hasn't been enhanced like that completely bungled effort to restore a fresco of Christ the Redeemer in Italy! If I remember correctly, this impressive work of art still accurately captures a McKay Clipper's features. It's unfortunate it's been so unusually washed out, especially for a Samuel Walters piece. Since my preference is to share an entire image, I've attached it here. Not wanting to hijack his Glory of the Seas blog, I'm now dropping the issue in respect to Rob.
  2. Hi Michael, I came across a rare painting attributed to Samuel Walters, who's renowned for the accuracy of his works. This is a close up of the bow and original figurehead of the McKay Clipper Lightning. What impressed me is that in this depiction, it appears that much like Glory of the Seas, the Lightning has similar naval hoods and gold leaf embellished carved cutwaters. Notice the sheer plan of Lightning. Pay particular attention to her bow. There's literally an open space where her cutwater, naval hoods and figurehead would be located. Donald McKay was famous for wanting to keep his nautical designs secret. I believe that's why even today, none of the contemporary McKay Clippers feature accurate bow treatments. For that reason, I see our group's accurate Glory of the Seas reconstruction as sort of a Rosetta Stone to revisit many of Donald McKay's other Clipper Ships.
  3. Michael, by Lightning I figure you're referring to the famous McKay Clipper "Lightning" and not a lightning bolt?
  4. George K, thanks for giving us your insight into the challenges you face and how you're successfully resolving them. Like Rob, you're consistently doing a masterful job in your build.
  5. George K, thanks for the additional pics. Kudos to you and your group for continuing a fine history of maintaining such an interesting historical structure. It looks like from the outset, the designers wanted to provide their Lighthouse Keepers with an ability to view 360 degrees around their vicinity. That must be why those fascinating cupolas are in every wall of the building. Cool building overall.
  6. George, I can't answer your question about Model Expo's replacement service, since I've never dealt with them. However, if your kit was new when purchased, I would let them know that. Reputable companies will supply some parts free of charge as long as they know you're not trying to rip them off. Thanks for the fun pics of your maintenance trip. That 1875 lighthouse structure is really neat. If you have more scenes of that, I'd like to see them. Out of pure curiosity, any idea how much of the original building is left?
  7. Rob, I honestly can say I don't believe I've ever seen furled sails depicted on a model sailing ship before. This is such a convincing portrayal too that it's quite possible to imagine the crew climbing her ratlines and working all over this ship. Well done. Does anybody know if there's a way to share a 'Word' document? My NRJ article which is practically writing itself and being so image heavy is now 17 pages long. I'd love to share it here as it's still not finished yet....
  8. Rob, knowing that the crossjack yard has the smallest dimension of the three lower yards (both main and fore yards are 90' each) it's amazing how large the crossjack looks on the mizzen. It must have been quite a sight to see these massive spars on Glory herself. It's no wonder this vessel was so popular at every port she docked at.
  9. Rob, it's amazing how busy the base of your mizzenmast has become with so many lines being belayed just there alone! I can see why you found it necessary to add extra belaying pins in the rail. I'm curious, are you following the belaying chart from "Clipper Ship Captain" or developing your own pattern?
  10. Rob, if you review the 80 some odd pages of your blog alone, add in Vlad's dozen or more and there's more than enough images and discoveries to support multiple articles. I guess it depends on the level of interest the initial one generates. I will discuss the possibility of a series with Mike to see how he feels. Meanwhile, I don't want you or Vlad to feel any pressure to speed up your construction processes that might adversely impact your build qualities.
  11. Rob, I wouldn't be concerned about the article's deadline. There's already plenty of photos being submitted. Once I finish writing it. I estimate it's about 75% done. I will share it with you unedited just for your response. At the same time, it will be emailed to Mike for his critique and I'm sure the inevitable editing. He's had many articles published so I'm sure he'll know how to proceed. Meanwhile, just proceed at a comfortable pace. If there's enough interest and with author Mike's "juice" I strongly suspect there will be, there probably will be a follow up article. What's really exciting is how this writing project is taking on a life of it's own. It will be fascinating to see Mike's reaction. That will be the true test of whether I've hit the mark or if it will need more work. Either way, July's deadline will be the one.
  12. Rob, I have high confidence that the finished piece will actually get published. Since I'm including some images I took off of some museum websites, I imagine I'll need to get their ok to include their images. I don't expect to get compensation, so I don't anticipate any problem. Maybe they'll even supply better images too. What's surprising is how much volume there really is to cover. At this point it's also becoming image heavy but it feels like the photos being shared really contribute to the narrative. I'm sure once it's reviewed and edited by Mike, it will be pared down to a more reasonable size. Or, who knows? Maybe it will become a two part installment. One thing I'm sure of. I will not miss the July 1st deadline. This will be submitted long before then.
  13. Rob, your masterclass on rigging is just deeply satisfying to observe. It also makes total sense to rig from aft to bow forward, as that's precisely how the stresses of sailing with stiff winds would be spread. I totally agree about the davit positions on both sides being identical. As I hope to include my revised 3' hull sketch with the Nautical Research Journal article, revised positioning of those davits is just one of a few corrections to be made. Mike's Ozzie friend Ron Haug has identified about a dozen minor errors. I've asked for his list in order to address them all. I want to meet his standards in order to have the most accurate, ultimate "Glory of the Seas" resource for everyone to be proud of. Finally I hope to darken all major lines in order to make it easier to scan. While I couldn't meet the April 1st deadline which is their Fall edition, I'm well positioned to meet July 1st, for Winter 2023. Vladimir, if you could possibly fix the rear gangway to the rear carriage house, I'd love to share that image. I know it's also a challenge but if you could also sculpt an "Athena" figurehead, I really want to show the impressive bow of your model too. It's my intention to give each of your creations as equal representation as possible. "Druxey" I haven't forgotten your lovely line drawing of Glory's figurehead. Let me know if your actual name is in your profile so I can give you the proper recognition you deserve. At this point, I've been using your full names. If anyone's not ok with that, just let me know. With the too many images included already, this is turning out to be a very long article. Once done, it will be submitted to Mike for his critique and editing. If anyone knows how to share a Word document, please let me know and I'll be happy to share it here.
  14. Rob, when I saw your incredibly realistic modeling of weathered, furled sails on your mizzen, spanker boom, it immediately reminded me of this scene from 1910. Your work practically matches that scene just about perfectly.
  15. Rick310 I have a feeling you'd appreciate this. Mike Mjelde shared this lovely painting with me. He wanted me to see the elaborate stern carving on a large American Clipper Ship on left. It's an excerpt from the book "Antonio Jacobsen, Painted Ships on Painted Oceans" retrospective on the artist's works. As part of my ongoing efforts to reconstruct the beautiful, elaborate carvings on Glory's stern, I did this preliminary pen & ink sketch. When I get a chance, I'll revisit this with pencil to make it more workable. I think you did an excellent job, far better than rather hoky, awkward attachments provided with some kits.
  16. George K, nice descriptions of the complex work necessary to create scale chain plates. It gives me a greater appreciation for the work done behind the scenes. The chains on the ladder make total sense. Rob discovered that Glory also had metal rails that went clear across the rear of the forecastle deck too an item which hardly ever gets depicted. .
  17. Rick310 approximating carved Stern work on your "Flying Fish" is just beautiful. You've managed to create it to scale too. A feat even more impressive, considering the scale you're working in.
  18. Rick310 Michael Mjelde sent us detailed images of the Samuel Walters "Glory of the Seas" oil. In this quarterdeck scene, it's evident there are no belaying pins in either railings. I noticed there's some block and tackle rigging inside her bulkhead, just ahead of the mizzen shrouds. How that's mounted isn't visible and by the angle of the lines, they appear to go to the main mast. Based on this evidence, it looks like Rob's approach is correct, at least as Glory's concerned.
  19. Rick310 if by any chance you still have that 15 yr old catalog, can you scan & share the same painting from it? There's some distortion in photos, probably from an inability to get a decent angle and the large size of the piece. I'd really appreciate seeing how it appeared in the catalog, if at all possible.
  20. Rick310 thanks for sharing this ultra rare contemporary depiction of "Flying Fish". Before you mentioned it, I had no idea such an impressive piece even existed. In the 2nd image, the left side has a beautiful blue sky. The rest of the painting has more of a golden hue. I was wondering if the true colors of the piece are that blue area?
  21. Rick310 two facts about the rear house rail on "Flying Fish" which differ from other McKay Clippers. First and this unusual element is confirmed by two contemporary pieces of work, there's no surrounding safety rail for the roof of the rear structure; second the front overhang (3' on Glory) and about 6' of both corners are protected my a metal rail. As we've both concluded, Buttersworth depicted this lovely rail as brass. His portrayal of the graceful curving ends feels correct too. Modeling a curving wall should be relatively easy. Just get a small flat piece of wood like a tongue depressor. Measure the distance from quarterdeck inner bulkhead wall to outside corner of the rear house front fascia. Drill a hole and insert a pencil vertically through it. Trace floor lines consistently distant from bulkheads. Done properly this results in two walkways equidistant while the house walls match the same pattern as the rear quarter deck bulkheads.
  22. Rick310 I like how you crafted that curved piece. It definitely matches that depicted in the chinese painting. I thought this image would interest you, while it's contradictory to both "Flying Fish" pieces of artwork, here's the actual rear quarter rail ending as seen on "Glory of the Seas". It appears to be an elegantly curved piece of wrought iron which is inserted into the top of the rail on one side and straight down into the hull on the other. I think you'll find that curved diminishing walls will look more sensible once installed. As for the wider quarter rails, I was wondering since most of the lines are terminated inside the missen shrouds, according to how Rob is rigging his Glory, would the extra belaying pins be necessary?
  23. Rob, an elegant solution for an elegant vessel. I particularly appreciate the flexibility of being able to remove your model from the stand.
  24. Rick310 first, thanks for the compliment. While you can't revise the front fascia, already more accurate than most, you can still modify the sides into a gradual reducing curve and reduce the rear wall to match the similar profile as confirmed by the photo of Glory docked in Alaska. Such a configuration makes better sense for working of the ship. What I find very unusual is the missing safety rails for most of the rear house but according to both works of art, that's the case. The Buttersworth piece looks like the rail is painted yellow but I suspect it might have been brass instead. McKay was famous for using the finest materials in constructing his vessels so the brass isn't that far fetched. As for the more natural Flying Fish figurehead, that's in keeping with the more ornate carvings of the time. Sailors were very proud of their figureheads, which epitomized the spirit of the vessel. I'm looking forward to seeing your progress.
×
×
  • Create New...