MORE HANDBOOKS ARE ON THEIR WAY! We will let you know when they get here.
×
ClipperFan
-
Posts
2,150 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by ClipperFan
-
George, Thanks for sharing your topmast build process in such specific detail. Addition of brass reinforcement which will be well disguised is a brilliant solution for such delicate trestle tree work. Great artisan quality work!- 602 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, As I view the ever growing gossamer labyrinth of rigging on your spectacular Clipper Glory of the Seas, it occured to me that so far you have yet to run any of the fore and aft block & tackle lines that would normally turn these massive yards into the wind. This must be part of your deliberate plan to address all of the other lines you have already rigged, basically supporting the vertical movement of the yards. It also means she will be an even more impressive vessel with these seemingly endless, potentially bewildering lines. From what you so masterfully described of your process so far, it sounds like you're working from the top down, with the highest lines belaying further out and lower lines belaying closer in. I also repeat my sincere hope that you're maintaining some sort of organizing chart of this amazing rigging process. I'm sure Vlad would echo this sentiment. Continue working your magic!
- 3,560 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Just magnificent work! I remember thinking when I saw the stunning height of her mizzen mast, how tall that structure looked. Now, compared to her fore and main mast, the mizzen looks positively diminutive! All I can think of, is how this must have been such a mind bending experience to actually view McKay's Clipper Glory of the Seas in person! Simply amazing...
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Thanks. Of all reconstructions I've done so far, this has been the most challenging. I do know though that, since I've seen such intricate, antique woodwork on large pieces of furniture, this approaches those works. It will be interesting to see how this actually looks on your model.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Vladimir, Druxey, Pat It made my eyes blurry at times but I finally finished the Stern scrollwork arch over Glory of the Seas. Usually such work is done by tracing one side reversing and repeating it on the other side. I just freehand drew the right Starboard side to visually match the left Port one. Since I drew the Port side first, my suggestion would be to use it as your source and then reverse it to make the opposite side match exactly.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 3
-
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Vladimir, You're welcome. I'm going to finish Glory's Stern scrollwork, Mike's upper forecastle view and darkening the large 1:96 scale hull drawing, which is now as accurate as it can be made. Then it all goes to NRJ for publication.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, as non other than genius Albert Einstein himself wryly pointed out: "If a cluttered desk is a sign of a cluttered mind, of what, then is an empty desk a sign?" FYI: congratulations for being recognized, even if it's a back-hand slap!
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Druxey, It will be interesting to see how many images get through. To me a large part of the article is the beautiful pictures which tie it all together coherently. Time will tell.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Thanks for the compliment. The next project I'm concentrating on is to finish the scrollwork. It's challenging to do. Once the port side is satisfactorily done, it has to be reversed for the Starboard side. It will be done! 😊
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Vladimir, Druxey, et all, in final preperation for submitting my 30+ page Nautical Research Journal article, with a hard deadline of June 30th (July 1st per their guidelines). That gives me 2 weeks to finish. Here are 3 finished pieces: Glory of the Seas rear coach house ornate front fascia. Skylights with the correct 6 panes Wheelhouse split-level ventilator Stern letters & carving, in process
- 3,560 replies
-
- 6
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
MikeR, I'm constantly impressed with the high level of vision, craftsmanship and artisan abilities of modeling I'm privileged to observe on these pages. For a couple years now, Rob, Vladimir and I have been in the most exhaustive reconstruction of McKay's final Medium Clipper Glory of the Seas. Why should that concern you in your Flying Fish build? There's been major structural components of the McKay bow which I know for a fact, have been largely ignored by the modeling community. Why this is, I don't know but since there exists enough documentary and visual evidence to correct the issue, I've been endeavoring to share this. In his evaluation of the rugged construction of the prow of Donald McKay's second Extreme Clipper Flying Cloud in his April 25, 1851 Boston Daily Atlas article Duncan MacLean described his impression of this unique maritime invention: "She has neither head nor trail boards, but forming the extreme, where the line of the planksheer and the carved work on the naval hoods terminate, she has the full figure of an angel on the wing, with a trumpet raised to her mouth." further on he describes his evaluation of this construct: "Her hood ends are bolted alternately from either side, through each other and the stem, so that the loss of her cutwater would not affect her safety or cause a leak." I've added the italics to emphasize a point. If you look at any model of Flying Cloud you won't find either naval hoods or cutwater. Rob and I are now convinced that's due to these clever devices being intentionally hidden by the inventor himself. Any doubt can be cleared up by looking at the lines of his 1854 Extreme Clipper Lightning. Where her bow stem should be completed, there's literally nothing, just open space. In conclusion, since his Extreme Clipper Flying Fish was his fourth such large vessel after the Clipper Packet Staffordshire it's doubtful McKay would have abandoned such a successful construction. Since it carried all the way to his final sailing ship, it's logical to believe that Flying Fish also incorporated both nautical devices. Attached is the original sheer and body lines plan of Flying Fish from the Bergen, Sjorfortsmuseum, Norway of all places. It's an original tracing of Flying Fish. Excluded are the 16" fancy rail above the main rail molding, as well as the cutwater and naval hoods. I've shared my conjectural sketch overlaying this original tracing, drawn to scale with her 18" inner bowsprit, naval hoods, cutwater and figurehead. A more lifelike image of a possible flying fish figurehead is also included. It's my belief that this makes much more sense than tacking on the flying fish figurehead onto a bare stem, which is how most completed models have done.
-
Rob, Having been on several tall ships, I've been able to see these rope coils first hand. Believe me, the realism you're portraying is first rate. Your replica would look odd and unfinished without them. And it's a tribute to your meticulous attention to all the little details.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, just a dumb process question. Can't you put in rope coils after you secure lines, at least some of them? That way, wouldn't it relieve you of some of that challenging, I've got to imagine tricky 1 ft tweezer work? Or, does doing it that way slow down your process even more than they way your doing it now?
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Unless someone has stood on the deck of a tall ship and stared straight up at the apparently bewildering latticework of complex blocks, tackles and practically limitless lines, they cannot fully comprehend how incredibly faithful to an actual sailing ship your work is. Looking intently at these images brings me back several years to when I was standing on the deck of the venerable Frigate USS Constitution "Old Ironsides." I remember craning my neck backwards as I stood behind the main mast. There's something just so relaxing to view those lofty masts and powerful yardarms. I get that exact same feeling now as I review your pictures. Well done indeed. Qq
- 3,560 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rick, From the few online images I've seen of the spectacular Flying Cloud miniature, especially in reference to her gorgeous sail plan, this Boucher model is definitely worth seeing in person. Having said that, it's still inaccurate to the Boston Daily Atlas contemporary description, as well as several contemporary art depictions. Her lovely trumpet bearing winged angel figurehead is merely tacked on below the bowsprit. There's no naval hoods or gilded carved arch cutwater. Meanwhile a small portico protecting the entrance to rear cabins below is a substantial building on the model. Eventually I intend to make sketches correcting these oversights and share them on a separate page. As for the two artists, it's quite possible that both were able to view Flying Fish in person. The similarity of portrayals is just too much for coincidence. It's also a good possibility that in a refit, a single stick mizzen was replaced with a built mast after discovering sticks weren't strong enough.
- 602 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Addition of those rope coils to the belaying points is an ultimate touch of miniature realism. When she's complete, your Glory of the Seas Clipper Ship with such devout attention to detail will blow people away.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, For Vladimir's sake, I really hope you're keeping meticulous records of your impressive rigging scheme. It's nothing short of amazing!
-
Hi Rob, I hear you about that distracting phenomenon. I recall having similar challenges with much smaller sailing ships. They had woefully inadequate, painfully simplistic rigging instructions, just your very basic standing, running rigging with preformed rubberlike ratlines. So we innovated quite a lot to approach as much realism possible. I remember making teenie blocks of knotted black thread. At the scale they were, these were quite realistic. In our case we simply worked from inside out and fore to aft from lowest to highest yards. I have no clue how you're designing your lines but I recall that by staying consistent, things seemed to flow better. Of course, you already built and fully rigged the King of Donald McKay's Clipper Ships with your scratch built masterpiece, the Great Republic. So I'm very confident, you got this.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, As the complex rigging of your miniature becomes ever more complete, it strikes me how critically important it would have been on these massive sailing vessels to be sure none of the lines get tangled up with any others, or there must have been hell to pay! I constantly find myself running out of superlatives to describe your progress. Impressive, most impressive!
- 3,560 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
Rob, Thanks for the encouraging words. My placement of the bit matches exactly that of Mike's, which I figured matched the exact end of the inner end of the bowsprit. My other concern is placement of the capstan. There was no specifics of that location, so mine matches the side view placement of my large sketch. If you have exact dimensions for that device, I can reposition it in both sketches.
- 3,560 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- clipper
- hull model
- (and 2 more)
-
George, I meant no insult to the legendary Tea Clipper Cutty Sark and for that disparagement, unintentional as it was on behalf of the Bonnie Scottish Lass, I apologize. After all, Cutty Sark herself is a most successful survivor whilst poor old Glory of the Seas was burnt to cinders. My point was the lost design uniqueness of McKay's Clippers, which has been buried for well over a century is finally coming to light.
-
Rob and Rick, No surprise, I agree completely with Rob's conclusion. I write this, not to hijack your Flying Fish posts but to reinforce the importance for yours and all future Flying Fish builds, even to get all future McKay Clipper models constructed accurately. This unveiling of a universal nautical feature of all Donald McKay Clippers hasn't occured possibly since the launch of Flying Cloud in the Spring of 1851! In fact, I have not even seen one accurate example of Flying Cloud herself. None has ever been built, including a two-thirds scale version of her docked in East Boston in the '70s. That beautiful Clipper was constructed by the same skilled Lunenberg, Nova Scotian ship builders who constructed the 1963 HMS Bounty! In a way, it's a back handed slap, a tribute to McKay's jealous protection of his savvy marine ideas. Perhaps, posthumously his spirit's finally decided to set the record straight. Even though, for those who can read and view images with discrimination, these have been somewhat open secrets.... "This magnificent ship has been the wonder of all who have seen her. Not only is she the largest of her class afloat, but her model may be said to be the original of a new idea in naval architecture." The New Clipper Stag Hound, Boston Daily Atlas, December 21, 1850 (italics added for emphasis) There's a "blink and you'll miss it" reference to the bow construction of this revolutionary new Donald McKay Extreme Clipper Ship. Here's all the author says on the subject. In fact, it's actually a single, almost toss off sentence: "An idea of its sharpness may be formed from the fact that, at the load displacement line (as the cutwater is tapered to an angle) a flat surface applied to the bow from its extreme, would show no angle at the hood ends." (again italics added for emphasis). In fact, Duncan MacLean never uses the term naval hoods until his more in-depth description of McKay's second Extreme Clipper Flying Cloud. That's where he makes his critical observation of the incredible strength of such a brilliant construct. To get an idea of this built in ruggedness, take a look at the relative open, near frailness of the Tea Clipper Cutty Sark. So, is it any surprise to see this very same marine architecture utilized by Donald McKay in his self-funded, desperate last build to save his shipyard and very livelihood? Think about it, McKay literally spared no expense, employing the very best materials in building his Glory of the Seas. It's noteworthy that his reliable stem, protected by cutwater surmounted by naval hoods are all there to the end.
-
Rick, With Mike's encouragement, I've already prepared a 30+ page in-depth article to be submitted before July 1st to the Nautical Research Journal. It's very image heavy but not because they're extraneous. The pictures included are actually integral to the topics discussed. Since Mike has told me he really enjoyed reading it, I'm confident it will be published. Earliest would be their Winter issue, probably this December. After that, I plan on starting my own topic in research. It will be on the topic of finally realizing authentic looks of Donald McKay's Clippers.
-
Rob, Nice pic of one of Donald McKay's fastest Clipper Ships. She was very close in size to Glory of the Seas too.
Our Emblem ®
