Jump to content

rybakov

Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Post One Hundred and Seventy-two
    Sphinx and ‘Indy’
    I thought members may be interested to see the comparison between Chris’s two premier kits, Sphinx and Indefatigable.
    They sort of represent the alpha to omega of British frigates.
    Sphinx, the bijou 9 pounder vessel, and ‘Indy’, the pocket battleship of her day, carrying 24 pounders supplemented with 42 pounder carronades.
    I recall that when I built Sphinx I thought she was quite large, when ‘Indy’ arrived I thought I’m going to need a bigger bench!

    04505

    04506

    04507

    04508

    04512

    05413

    05414

    04517
    If a large statement model is required ‘Indy’ is a good choice, but if masted and fully rigged she will take up a lot of room.
    Built Navy Board style she is still a heavy model and a glass case even with reduced height and width adds considerably to the weight.
    Sphinx is certainly of a size more amenable to a domestic setting; a pretty little frigate that appeals to my deeper affection for the more decorative vessels of the 18thc. before austerity took over as the expensive Napoleonic wars ground on.
     
    Indefatigable sort of spans this period, all black and yellow, no decorative topsides, but the stern gallery still looks good to my eye. She is modelled with an open Fo’csle before her bulwarks were built up, and she does have a magnificent Figure at her head.
     
    I am more than happy to have both in my collection.
     
     
    Thank you, Chris, for providing me with an engrossing thirteen months of work. It is a tribute to your designs, to be able to build a model of this quality and detail in such a short time.
     
    Thanks are also due to James, for producing the prototype ‘Indy’ build which provided a very useful reference guide.
     
    B.E.
    02/05/2024
  2. Like
    rybakov reacted to Siggi52 in HMS Tiger 1747 by Siggi52 - 1:48 - 60 gun ship from NMM plans   
    Hello,
    the wheels. They kept me busy this week, and other things like my garden. But now they are in the raw ready. I think I must not explain the pictures

     
     
     
     and then that  So, go back to start, and try again
     
    This time I made the beads before I cut the rim loose. The shipwright is pleased.
    In the foreground you see some of the spokes. They are from mammoth ivory. So, if you hear nothing from me the next weeks, I'm busy or I had thrown it all away. I hope not.

     
  3. Like
  4. Like
  5. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Post One hundred and Seventy-one
    Album photo's
    I have at last got around to taking the completion photo’s which will form part of the Photo build record book that I’m currently putting together.

    4395
    4361A

    4392

    4364

    4365

    4391

    4390

    4396

    4369

    4405

    4395

    2161A

    2145a

    4397

    2162a

    2164a

    4380

    4379

    4388

    4494a
    I am currently faffing around with a clinker built 18’ cutter, and ‘Indy’ is yet to be enclosed in her case, so the story has not quite ended.
     
    Then there’s the 26’ Launch, still on my mind.
     
    Cheers,
     
    B.E.
     
  6. Like
    rybakov reacted to Hubac's Historian in Soleil Royal by Hubac's Historian - Heller - An Extensive Modification and Partial Scratch-Build   
    I can’t escape the fact that I continue to fail at this chain-making exercise.  As the old maxim goes, though, every failure is one step closer to success.
     
    I’ve now thrown away two whole batches of chain preventer plates.  While I was quite right to follow Andre Kudin’s example, for the process of their manufacture, I eventually discovered that that process is not entirely transferable from 1:48 to 1:96 scale.
     
    After forming his basic links, Andre solders them closed at one end, and then places the closed link back onto the two pins so that he can crimp an eye on each end with his round pliers.
     
    Well, the 28 gauge brass wire I’m using does not provide enough surface area for a strong enough bond to survive the crimping.  My success to failure ratio was pretty poor:

    So, my lesson from that exercise was that I needed to do the crimping before soldering one end closed:

    These soldered loops will be the lowest end of the chains, bolted into the wales.  That way, I could induce a series of bends into the upper half of each preventer plate, so that they could overlay the next small link:

    Above I’m just using another preventer plate to check that the bends I’m making are sufficient.
     
    So, I spent a good chunk of time cleaning up the solder and inducing bends into the remainder of the preventer plates.  The solder joint will be re-enforced with the CA glue that fixes the pin-bolt in place:

    With that out of the way, I could make a new, slightly closer-spaced pin jig for the next small link, which is only crimped on one end, where it seats beneath the preventer plate.
     
    Now that I have a process that I know will work, and now that I’ve had all of this practice, these next links should go fairly quickly:


    I have a lot of these to make, solder and bend - about 70 to ensure I can use the best.  This has all been a colossal PITA, but it was really important to me that all of this look very clean and uniformly shaped.  In the process, I have acquired some very valuable metal skills that will only enhance this and future projects.
     
    That said, I am going to experiment with using black nylon thread of an appropriate diameter to connect the deadeye strop loops to the small links.  This would essentially be a variation on the way that the stock kit represents these links, but I will do individual chain loops that draw tight with some form of slip-knot that I can pull up and hide behind the deadeye strop.
     
    Andre had a great method for producing these variances, but it is all just that much more tedious in the smaller scale.
     
    The advantages of doing this are several.  So long as there is not a jarring difference in appearance between the black thread and the blackened metal, it will save me tremendous amounts of time.  It also simplifies the difficulty of accurately measuring and keeping track of a series of increasingly longer links as the shroud angle increases from fore to aft.  Lastly, it greatly simplifies the placement of the deadeyes because I can add the retaining strip, in advance, and it also makes it much easier to locate and properly secure the bottom two links.  Hopefully, that will work out.  
     
    Well, I keep saying that I’m going to get back in the swing of the project, and then I get sucked into coaching another basketball team - now my son’s Spring rec team.  Meanwhile, the Rangers and Knicks are just too compelling to ignore this post-season.  At least for now, I can see the end of the tunnel for these chains, which is tremendously motivating, and then I can return to the more immediately gratifying work of outfitting and arming the main deck.
     
    Thank you all for taking the time to look back in on This Old Build.  More to come!
     
  7. Like
    rybakov reacted to Siggi52 in HMS Tiger 1747 by Siggi52 - 1:48 - 60 gun ship from NMM plans   
    Hello,
    the last bulwark(?) between captains bed place and the lobby is installed. 



    Before I install the deck beams I have to make a decision, where to place the cannons? All sources say, there where 8 6 pdrs at the QD and 2 6 pdrs at the FC. But I never saw a model with a cannons at the FC! At least there is not so much space for cannons.
     
    That cannon to the left has the problem with the shrouds, and the cannon to the right with the hight of the fife rail.

    At least I could place all cannons at the QD, without one in the captain cabin. That would make the captain happy. And that is what you see at most of the models. If no one has a veto, I think I build it so.

     
  8. Like
    rybakov reacted to Siggi52 in HMS Tiger 1747 by Siggi52 - 1:48 - 60 gun ship from NMM plans   
    Hello, and many thanks for your likes and comments
     
    Ian, I would be lucky if there where no sanding or glue marks  But at least, now the last are gone
    Marc, with the symmetry it's such a thing. Because I had no real experience with this way to build a model, I chose a too thin plywood. So the starboard side is some millimetres broader then the port side of the ship. But you would't notice it without a ruler.  
     
    Here a picture with all 12 pounders in place, but now not permanently. Notice also my efforts to make the walls of the QD symmetrical. 

    As long as the oil has to dry, I'm looking how to set up the cabins. At the sheer plan the first bulwark begins 1m behind the wheels. At the floor plan directly behind them. That may also be a mistake in the sheer plan, or there where some cabins like at the model of the Centurion? The wheels here are behind the mizzen mast. And is there a cabin for at least the master? I looked at the pictures of models and plans from that period. They are all different. Even from plan to model  I prefer the way they did it at the Medway. That correspondent with the way they did it at the 60 gunner model I saw at Chatham. And I think that it will work, when the bed place for the captain is at least 2 m broad. 

  9. Like
  10. Like
    rybakov reacted to archjofo in La Créole 1827 by archjofo - Scale 1/48 - French corvette   
    @druxey
    Hello,
    I'm glad you like it. Thanks !
    I would also like to thank everyone else for the LIKES.
     
    Continuation: Equipment of the mizzen topgallant yard – Vergue de perruche
    After a suggestion from model building colleagues, I secured the mousing of the hook for the tye with a thinner three strand rope with a diameter of 0.15 mm that was specially made for this purpose.

    We then continued with the quarter blocks (clew lines and sheets), which are among the smallest double blocks on the model.
    For the block ropes I used ropes with a diameter of 0.25 mm, which were served with silk yarn.

    The last two pictures show the arrangement of the quarter blocks with the truss already attached.


    Up soon …
  11. Like
    rybakov reacted to Siggi52 in HMS Tiger 1747 by Siggi52 - 1:48 - 60 gun ship from NMM plans   
    Hello,
    my finger is so far useable again and so I finished today the bulwark.



     
  12. Like
    rybakov reacted to archjofo in La Créole 1827 by archjofo - Scale 1/48 - French corvette   
    Continuation: Equipment of the mizzen topgallant yard – Vergue de perruche 
    After a short creative break, we continue with the equipment of the mizzen topgallant yard. The equipment and rigging elements basically correspond to those of the fore topgallant yard, but again with correspondingly smaller dimensions. The mizzen topgallant tye is also equipped with a hook. At around 4 mm long, this is even smaller than the hook for the tye of the fore topgallant yard. Of course, the eye splice couldn't be missing either. With a rope with a diameter of 0.35 mm (2x3 Japanese silk thread - rope in the original ø 17 mm) this is a difficult matter, but after some practice it is definitely doable. It just looks better and corresponds to the original design.
    As already described several times, I use an injection needle as a hollow spike for splicing, with a diameter of 0.8 mm for the thin ropes.

     
    In the next picture you can see the mizzen topgallant tye with the double strop and the thimble already tied on to guide the simple clueline.

     
    Sequel follows …
  13. Like
  14. Like
    rybakov reacted to Beef Wellington in HMS Jason by Beef Wellington - Caldercraft - 1:64 - Artois-class frigate modified from HMS Diana 1794   
    The Ekeing and Cathead supporter:
     
    The Ekeing is a detail as presented in the kit that consists of a simplified approach consisting of cat head supporter and ubiquitous white metal moldings.  I was determined to make this as prototypical as I could as shown on the plans.  Studying numerous contemporary models, this is a detail that seems to vary quite a lot, and I'm unsure whether this varied significantly from ship to ship, or whether the model builders took their own simplified approaches.   The following photos of Minerva helped a lot in visualizing this complex shape consistent with the original plans (photos are my own taken at the Rogers Collection).
    This was a very humbling experience and definitely one of the more challenging pieces to make, requiring many hours of fiddling and sanding.  In short (!) , the Eking and cathead supporter needs to meet the following criteria:
     
    Narrow from 3mm to approx 2mm at the middle rail to butt into it cleanly Follow the curve of the hull Extend the graceful curve of the middle rail up to the cathead when viewed from the side Be positioned such that the cathead sits snuggly against the top of the main rail, and is perpendicular to the hull Follow a smooth curve outboard from the cathead to the lower rail, the ekeing curving forward almost immediately below the cathead Pass just upward of the outboard hawse hole, but cross the inner....(differing from Minerva above)  
    I had a couple of abortive attempts which while failures, were very helpful in helping me understand the approach described in TFFM Vol 2.   The best piece of advice here is focus on one curved face at a time.  A cardboard template was made to approximate the profile (this was initially estimated using the spare metal molding strips which work well for this).   (Note:  In the photos below, the various rails have been cut out to allow placement of the final rail.  (When the template was made this had not been done which made this a little more challenging and subject to approximation)

    The profile of the hull at the bow was taken using a profile gauge and transferred to block of balsa.  The ekeing template was transferred to some 5mm pear sheet and cut out leaving quite a bit of excess.   The hull profile was then introduced onto the inward face.  The shaped balsa block helped a lot in this exercise to allow frequent validation.

    Once the inner profile had been finalised, the card template could be used to fine tune the shape.  This has to be transferred onto the curved surface that will sit against the hull, and it important to remember that the profile on the outboard face will be different because the shape will follow perpendicular to the interior face (i.e. the hull).  Some excess was still left here to allow additional fine tuning.

    The top of the profile was then thickened using some more 5mm pear, and the cathead supporters roughly shaped and glued into place.  The cathead supporters were attached perpendicular to interior face, not the exterior face.  This rough structure can then be further fine tuned, again using the template on the inner surface and ensuring that the top and bottom face are perpendicular to this along its length.  Following the advice in TFFM, The sternmost face was worked first, and once finalized, the inside curve was worked using the outside as a guide.  Once these had been completed, the outboard curve following the underside of the cathead supporter was introduced.
     
    The lower version shown below still required a lot of fine tuning on the model.

    Once happy with the shape, the position on the model could be determined, and the decorative rails cut to allow the ekeing to sit flush against the hull.  This was definitely a little nerve wracking and will require a little touch up when all is said and done.  (The outer surface profiling was not introduced until after this work had all been done and position finalised - these still require some finishing as these photos embarrassingly highlight...)  The end of the ekeing also needed to have the shape of the hawse hole introduced onto its lower edge to open that up.To allow the position to be determined, the catheads also needed to be madeup.  The "cathead" decorations on the end was made from polymeric clay and followed the very nice original example originally on Trincomalee and other contemporary models - they look a little more acceptable at a distance!  Not much else to comment on other than the dimensions and decoration were estimated from the original plans and inspired by contemporary models.  These will get further attention in due course.  The upper rail is still just pinned in place and will require the top to be shaped prior to final installation.

    Overall, I'm very pleased with how this came together, the various lines seem to flow quite nicely when viewed from the side which was a goal entering into this. The plansheer, ekeing, catheads and upper rail are all still dry-fit at this stage....but think I can move forward with more confidence.
     
  15. Like
    rybakov reacted to dafi in HMS Victory by dafi - Heller - PLASTIC - To Victory and beyond ...   
    Well, what can I say. I'm only away for a few weeks because of work and already my tinkering room doesn't want to let me back in ...

    "What does THIS strange man want here?!" was one of the nicer questions I had to listen to ...

    After some persuasion à la "man cave whisperer", I was allowed to do something in there after all. In the meantime, I had revised my lists of blocks for the Victory again. I had noticed that McKay had left out some quite some blocks in the AOTS and that there were also some errors among them. I had therefore plowed through the entire Steel of 1795 and worked through the various entries, compared them and selected the most plausible variant, possibly adding variants. All in all, there were significantly more blocks added, both the standard blocks and the special types. But more on that later.

    The last thing I did was to replace the square shoulder blocks, which are used on the ship today and which McKay also shows, with contemporary round ones. The main yard continues to serve as a model playing field. Here is a reminder of the last status.





    Next came 3 x 2.5 mm blocks on each side for the belly and nock gordings.



    Check on the tweezers whether the paint application is complete and either brush on the tweezers immediately ...



    ... or after the block has been pinned. Place a strop around the fixed block as described before ...



    ... and checked the length in place. Since the block hangs in front of the yard, the legs must of course be different lengths.



    The pointed tweezers with clamping function do a good job here, first one side ...



    ... and neatly trimmed, and the other and you're done 🙂



    Here is a comparison of the simplified version with a simple knot on the top of the yardarm and the more correct solution with a lashing.

    Since the lashing is tricky to thread, a classic needle helps.



    And this is how it should look 🙂



    With this technique, I'm now just as fast for the small blocks as I am for the large ones 🙂

    XXXDAn  
  16. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Cheers Guys, I will do a set of completion photos before I encase her, but the wooden framed glass case is  very heavy compared to my previous  acrylic covers, not very convenient for multiple  off and ons, and all the associated risks involved.
     
    @ Bug - A lot of the deck fittings are removeable including the rope coils, so these are taken off when cleaning.
    I simply start at the top;  firstly cleaning the rigging lines, then the masts and yards, using a soft paintbrush.
    For the dust on the decks I pick it up with a soft brush and suck the dust with a hand held vacuum (Dyson) I finish off the outside of the hull.
     
    Considering she has been uncased for many years she comes up pretty well, takes around 3hours + to do it.

    2007a
    Here she is stripped down for cleaning, built at a time before the availability and quality of fittings we have today she still remains one of my favourites.
     
    Regards,
     
    B.E.
     
  17. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Post One Hundred and Sixty-six
    My version of Indy is effectively completed now and with some serious moving about of models within my workroom/office, I have found room to house Indy in the prominent position she deserves, and without encroaching on other areas of the house.
    4223
    She has displaced Norske Love which now has a new position vacated by Alert which also has a new location.

    e2008a
    Had I completed the masting on Indy it would be in the order of that of Norske Love which is of a slightly smaller scale of 1:70.

    e2012a
    Norske Love has received a well overdue clean, having endured all the dust created during the construction of ‘Indy’.

    4022
    Not quite ready for the glass cover to be on yet, but at least the issue of ‘where are you going to put that’ is now resolved.
    As a bonus the lower profile of Indy compared to Norske love will allow me to re-arrange the wall Pictures and perhaps get one of Indy.
     
    I have decided to have a further dabble with the boats, and have started assembly of the 26’ Launch, pity not to make them up as they are provided with the kit.
     
    B.E.
    06/04/2024
     
  18. Like
    rybakov reacted to Siggi52 in HMS Tiger 1747 by Siggi52 - 1:48 - 60 gun ship from NMM plans   
    Hello,
    the carpenters finished the great cabin for the captain. It took some time, because the oil has to dry, some days of because of eastern and the good weather we had. But now it is raining again, so we are busy at the yard.




    Here the carpenters have the first bulwark allready finished in the raw.

  19. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Post One Hundred and Sixty-five
    Thank you, Allan, the kit didn’t include any standards to support the transom, but I note that Alex M has included five in his drawings of the Anson following conversion to a Razee. He also includes an extended central standard to support an Ensign staff tabernacle.
     
    I did think about following his example but decided that the double arrangement looked more aesthetically pleasing to my eye.
    I think the inclusion of such an item is a reasonable assumption to make, and the set up on the Indy kit almost begged the inclusion of the arrangement as I have modelled it.

    4206

    4207
    4217

    4211

    4212
    4205
     
    Onwards,
     
    B.E.
    04/04/2024
     
  20. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Post One Hundred and Sixty-four.
     
    Countdown to completion – still counting
    I am still fretting about the inclusion of fittings for an Ensign staff.
     
    The kit doesn’t include the fittings and few contemporary models show them.
    I don’t have any specific evidence for the type used on ‘Indy’, but she would certainly have had them.
    I lean towards a more substantial set-up than a simple block and cap-square fixed to the tafferal, given her origin as a Sixty-four.

    2154

    2155
    This is the set-up on Victory and the double knee fixing between the flag lockers would transfer well to the Indy.
    A block sits atop the standards, recessed for the staff and is fitted with a cap-square.
    A corresponding fitting (the step) to take the heel of the staff sits between the standards on the deck.
     
    Nothing to be lost by having a play around and using bits of Boxwood, I cobbled together an Ensign support for ‘Indy’.

    4183
    Fairly straightforward, two standards and a top cut out on the scroll saw, the trickiest part cutting the mortises to fit over the standard tops.

    4184
    A simple jig aids the assembly.

    4204
    The completed item, the Cap-square made from a piece of brass fret will be blackened before fitting.

    4190

    4197

    4199
    Steel conveniently gives the sizes of Ensign staffs by rate.
    For a Sixty-four = 38’ x 6¼” ø @ scale 181mm x 2.5mm ø
             50 gun     = 36’ x 6” ø    @ scale 171.5mm x 2.4mm ø
             44 gun     = 35’ x 5⅝” ø  @ scale 166.7mm x 2.2mm ø

    4195

    4196
    There is very little difference at scale, I used 3mm dowel for the staff and will adjust the length to suit my eye.
    The staff will require a degree of taper and the fitting of a truck.
     
    A satisfying days’ work - I’m inclined to keep it. ☺️
     
    B.E.
    02/04/2024
  21. Like
    rybakov reacted to giampieroricci in HMS PEGASUS by giampieroricci - Scale 1:36 - Swan-Class Sloop from plans by David Antscherl & Greg Herbert   
    The bow structure is finally finished. Some details are missing, which I will do later
     







  22. Like
  23. Like
  24. Like
    rybakov reacted to Blue Ensign in HMS Indefatigable 1794 by Blue Ensign - FINISHED - Vanguard Models - 1:64 scale   
    Post One Hundred and Sixty-three.
     
    Countdown to completion - the final stages. 
    This is the stage where I attend to all those little outstanding things, look through all the laser sheets and ask myself what the hell is that for, should I have fitted it?
     
    It is surprising how long it takes to rig the stanchion and Hammock crane lines.

    4164

    4162

    4163

    4166
    I use Syren 0.45mm ø natural line. I seem to recall from somewhere that tarred line was dispensed with as it tended to mark the hammocks.

    4165

    4167
    I decided to fit the Fo’csle with stanchions; I think they may well have been fitted, and it balances well with the rest of the model. 
    I used additional eyebolts to secure the ends of the lines.
     
    I had modified the gunport lanyards for the lower ports to a double arrangement on the Port side, but the starboard side remained to be done.

    4152

    4168
    Even tho’ it is a bit of a pain to do, I couldn’t leave odd sides.
     
    Boomkins.
    These less than attractive booms used to spread the Fore tack invariably cause me trouble. In my build they didn’t easily meet the angle of the cap square that secures them as they cross the Main Rail of the head, and the line was also inhibited by the position of the seats of ease which required a little adjustment.

    4159

    4160

    4174
    I also added the capsquares, represented by black card strips.
     
    B.E.
    01/04/2024
  25. Like
    rybakov reacted to archjofo in La Créole 1827 by archjofo - Scale 1/48 - French corvette   
    Continuation: Equipment of the fore topgallant yard – Vergue de petit perroquet
    As announced a long time ago, I started to equip the fore topgallant yard. In principle it is the same rigging elements and accessories as the main topgallant yard, just with reduced dimensions.
    In this respect, I don't want to repeat myself and let the pictures speak for themselves.



    The double blocks for the royal sheets and the single cluelines are also a little smaller.
    Here is a direct comparison of a quarter block for the main top gallant yard with those of the fore top gallant yard. Unfortunately, at this size you can already see some irregularities.

    In the next photo I show, among other things: an already made strop for a double block with my scale man, which I've been neglecting a bit lately. Actually a loyal companion at the model building yard for more than 10 years now.


    And here's another picture of the stirrups. On the one hand you can see the unraveled rope and on the other hand the finished braided plating.

     The sheets are connected to the cluelines in the usual way when no sails were attached.

     Finally, here is a picture of the entire fore topgallant yard, but still without lifts.
     
    Sequel follows …
×
×
  • Create New...