Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some kits come with copper others with white or black paint for the hull under the waterline. Considering that copper is an expensive material i would guess that only the more advanced ships got plates in reality? 

 

My Granado kit didnt come with copper, but would it be completely wrong to add it instead of the White paint?

Current builds: HMS Victory (Corel 1:98), HMS Snake (Caldercraft 1:64), HMBV Granado (Caldercraft 1:64), HMS Diana (Caldercraft 1:64), HMS Speedy (Vanguard Models 1:64) 

Posted

Anything venturing South beyond the Bay of Biscay would be coppered - resources permitting. Ships and boats that would be hauled out frequently or fall dry during tides, may not need this, as any fouling can be removed relatively easily.

wefalck

 

panta rhei - Everything is in flux

 

 

M-et-M-72.jpg  Banner-AKHS-72.jpg  Banner-AAMM-72.jpg  ImagoOrbis-72.jpg
Posted

The US Navy used to copper its launches (ships boats) in the Nineteenth Century.  A SNAME paper from 1900 describing the first generation of standardized boats says that as of 1900 launches were no longer to be coppered.  I don’t know when this practice started but Navy Ordinance manuals published in the 1850’s show coppered launches.

 

Launches were large and seaworthy enough to make extended voyages away from the parent vessel so the Navy apparently considered protection necessary.  Smaller boats were not coppered.

 

Roger

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...