Jump to content

wefalck

Members
  • Posts

    5,448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

8 Followers

About wefalck

  • Birthday 05/01/1956

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.maritima-et-mechanika.org

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Paris, France
  • Interests
    19th shipbuilding and naval history, indigeneous boats and their history

Recent Profile Visitors

8,377 profile views
  1. Thanks once more gentlemen for your encouraging praise! ************************************************************ Toolkit for the gun The operation of the gun required quite a few different tools for handling the projectiles and the powder-bags, as well as for cleaning and maintenance. There were two different wipers, one for cleaning with soap-water and the other one for greasing the bore after use. This still was the era of black powder, which means that the bore had to be cleaned frequently. Loading required a rammer to push the projectile and the powder-bags into the chamber of the gun. The rammer also served to unload the gun by pushing it through the muzzle. It had a depression in the front so that one would not push onto the fuse. The large-scale instruction model in the (former) Orlogmuseet in Copenhagen came with many of the necessary tools. Their look tallies with the description of a textbook on the Imperial German naval artillery (Galster, 1885). The length of the shaft was given as the length of the barrel plus some extra for one or two men to be able to hold onto it, while it was fully inserted. If there were not enough space for such long implements, there were also versions in two parts with a brass connecting sleeve. Wiper (top) and rammer (bottom) The body of the implements was turned from some 2 mm steel rod, as I had this to hand. The shaft is a 0.8 mm piano wire. The latter appears to be quite hefty, but seems to tally with the photographs. Wipers and rammer before painting As the gun will be shown undergoing a drill, the wipers are not needed and will be shown in their protective canvas covers, stored in the racks on deckhouse as per photograph below. Wipers in their protective canvas covers The canvas covers were simulated with some Vallejo liquid putty. According to Galster (1885) the covers were supposed to be painted black, but the above photograph indicates that they were white, which is what I opted for. The rammer body has two copper-bands to protect it, which were simulated with paint. The limited space in barbette seems to prevent the use of a full-length rammer, so I gave the end of the shaft a connecting sleeve simulated with paint. Tampion The photograph of the instruction model in Copenhagen also shows the expanding tampion that was constructed from two brass discs with some fibre material in between that was contained by a leather sleeve. An internal screw operated by a T-shaped handle squeezed the fibres between the disc and made them expand to lock into the muzzle. Expanding tampion for the 30,5 cm gun The tampion is probably going to be the very last machined part on this model. It was turned from a length of brass rod. The handle was first turned as a thin disk and then the excess material was milled away to leave the T-shaped handle standing. The greased leather sleeve has been simulated by some brown paint. Turning the tampion Milling the tampion handle The painted wipers, rammer and tampion Next on the list are the anchor-crane, the flagpole and flag and finally the gun-sights To be continued ....
  2. Beginning to take shape ... literally Yep, those heels always seem to be thicker than the rest. I once made a model with an entire backbone from brass sheet and had to solder on an extra thickness on both sides, which then was ground/filed to shape.
  3. No, they were running all the way through because they are, as I said earlier, structural parts that strengthen the hull at deck level. The scuppers are lead or copper pipes of around 2" internal diameter that lead from the corner below deck and the outboard, probably somewhere above the wale, say 1 to 1.5' below deck level. There would be different ways of simulating these scuppers: - The simples way would be to drill an appropriately sized hole, chamfer it a bit with a burr and then turn a soft pencil in the hole to simulate the lead - good for small scales. - Drill hole as before and insert a piece of cored solder wire from both ends; the core has to be bored out with an appropriately sized drill; flare out the ends. - There are small copper sleeves on the market that would be crimped over electrical wire instead of soldering; use instead of the solder wire; they can be found in electronics shops.
  4. Underhill states that these were (to his knowledge) used only on some four-masted barques(?) - that some 40 years after your FLYING FISH. I gather the FLYING FISH used hoops to attach the driver to the mast, so there would be no need for these kind of 'ladders' anyway. So, close both eyes and ignore.
  5. The picture below is from the large-scale model of her in the Musée de la Marine in Paris, but in the old set-up, she is not currently on display. The model seems to indicate that the sheathing was Muntz-metal not copper. The paint-scheme is not naturalistic, as the armour-belt is modelled in real steel and left unpainted.
  6. As these were 'innovatoins' that appeared late in the history of sailing ships, there may not have been a settled terminology. I wouldn't get worked up about terminology, the important thing is to understand how they worked.
  7. Well, the construction of wooden ships is rather different from modern warships and again what is done on some kits is different from how things were done on a real ship. The design of the 'waterways' and related planks can be something quite complex on larger ships and something relatively simple on smaller ones. In general, it is a plank more or less twice the thickness of the deck-planks that runs inside along the frames or stanchions. It acts as longitudinal stiffener at deck-level and the corner to the lower planks provides a gutter from which scuppers, lead pipes, would lead the water outside. Much of the water on small ship might actually be shed through a gap between the lowest bulwark plank and the waterways/filler pieces (see below). Freeing ports with swinging flaps came in use only later. I have looked on the Web for an illustration that might be close to the situation of your model, but only found one with two decks, but it shows the principle: In your case there may not be the plank called 'plank-sheer' in the above drawing, but only filler pieces between the stanchions. So you would need to run that strip of wood inside the frames/stanchions and will the space between the stanchions up to the level of the waterway. Hope that is reasonably clear
  8. There are also these guys: https://www.smallstuffmodels.com/p/products.html. They make a straight Mercedes DIII in 1/72 which would be a possible candidate for marinisation.
  9. In the first post FLYING FISH was mentioned. She was a three-masted ship, while Underhill mentions these vertical jack-stays some distance away from the 'jigger-mast' only for some four-masted barques(?). As the diameters of the iron masts increased it the traditional rigging of the spanker/driver with hoops became impractical and vertical jack-stays were rigged along the mast. The above jack-stays with ratlines provided access to this arrangement. As these jack-stays were only there to support men, they were probably shackled to mast-top and set taught in an eye-bolt/lug on deck either with a bottle-screw or lashings.
  10. I am not into aircraft, but seeing those engine kits, I have been tempted for a long time to put one into a model of those speedboats that were popular in the 1920 and that used marinised surplus aircraft engines. Building a model of the smallest Dornier flying boats, a LIBELLE, has also been on my temptation list. They used inter alia Siemens Halske sh4 and sh5 engines as well as British radial engines.
  11. Could be, like the solid soldering irons that one kept on a gas-cooker or similar. However, I have been more thinking in terms of the battery-operated hand-held gadgets for sealing plastic bags. They look a bit like a stapler, you press the ends together and the heating-wires are turned on, while you move the thing along the bag. I am thinking of prongs with a flat resistance-wire (as used in styrofoam cutters) inlay. I may have some suitable flat wire that I bought for a different purpose. Could be very simple and operated from a transformer with a foot-switch, so almost no moving parts - think of a glorified clothes-peg with very narrow tips. Perhaps I shouldn't have said this, but rather ran and patented the idea ...
  12. On static grass seeding: when Faller or Noch (don't remember who) first came onto the market with these grass flocks in the early 1960s (before that it was dyed sawdust), they sold for it application PE bottles. When I was into railway modelling in my teens, I have never been very successful with them, but at that time the fibres were sticking too much to each other or I put too much into the bottle.
  13. These are actually cutting tweezers from the watchmakers' arsenal. They are used for cutting watch-springs and such. I have had a pair for some 30 years now, bought from a watchmaking supply house. I use them all the time to cut fine wires and other thin hard materials, particularly when a close cut is needed, as the outside is flush. As the two cutting faces close on each other, but do not pass each other in a shearing motion, you cannot cut soft materials, such as threads. For this I also use Castrovejo-type micro-scissors, as used in eye-surgery. Over the past couple of decades hobby-suppliers have discovered these tools, but they may be buying industry 'seconds', so one cannot be sure of the quality. There are also traders (ebay et al.) who supply such tools that have not passed the quality requirements of brands and that can be a good deal (no hobby mark-up ...). The original question made me think and perhaps it would be possible to design some kind of heated tweezers, that would allow to fuse polyester thread to form eyes and such without having to make (fake-)splices (which are a challenge with very thin 'ropes'. The tweezer would need to have grooves in the end to shape the 'splice' without squashing the thread ...
  14. It would be interesting to know what insurers said about this and when. There may be also records of cases in front of the various maritime boards that could indicate from when on navigation lights were use and from when on they became compulsory - ploughing through such records would be tedious though. Everything mechanical or that moves on a ship and that is exposed to the elements is prone to get stuck sooner or later. It will also require extra maintenance. I have never seen any gimballing or simialr device on ship's navigation lights. Their way of fixture and hoisting was as simple as possible. For cabin lights the situation is different. It seems that petroleum lamps were often suspended in cardanic frames.
×
×
  • Create New...