Jump to content

popeye2sea

NRG Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,856

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by popeye2sea

  1. popeye2sea
    According to the plans, 1669. But, if it is indeed actually a model of the second SR then 1692? Regards, Henry
  2. popeye2sea
    For my SR I am definitely making my own t'gallant masts from wood. I am still debating replacing the top masts. They seem sturdy enough but I am just not sure. I am not that concerned with the length of the top masts. As Marc mentioned, the French seemed to go for longer top masts. Regards, Henry
  3. popeye2sea
    Bill, They are made in two pieces. A round ring shaped to fit the mast cut from flat styrene sheet stock, and another ring bent to fit the mast from quarter round styrene stock on top. I actually placed them on the mast in a position to help hold the deck down against the upward pull of all the rigging. There are additional stanchions placed amidships below the deck that help make the deck more rigid against downward flex also. Regards, Henry
  4. popeye2sea
    I had the same issue when I put a topcoat on my upper bulwarks to protect the gold paint. The finish was considerably more dull than the finish on the quarter galleries and stern. I debated putting the same finish on the stern or putting a more glossy finish on the sides. In the end, I decided that I liked the contrast with the stern decoration. It makes the stern stand out more. TLDR: I would leave it alone. Regards, Henry
  5. popeye2sea
    Navigating along a particular latitude was not that hard. All you needed was to keep the sun at the same declination. You could measure the angle with a quadrant, octant, or sextant. That is one of the reasons we have trade routes. In the North Atlantic, for example, you would sail south from Europe until you picked up the right latitude to catch the westerly trade winds then turn west and cross the Atlantic till you made landfall in South America or the Caribbean. To head back East, the return route was to sail North till you pick up the proper latitude to catch the easterly trade winds, turn East and sail till landfall in Europe. Figuring out how far East or West you were along that latitude, in other words calculating longitude, was a more difficult beastie. For that you needed accurate time keeping. Regards, Henry
  6. popeye2sea
    Welcome, Jakub. Regards, Henry
  7. popeye2sea
    Kuba, What I gave you was a general rule of thumb for ship rigged vessels of that era. Personally, I think that a 1.4 or 1.5mm rope will probably look just fine. But if you wish to go a bit larger, have at it. Whatever you feel looks good to your eye is what is important. BTW, I'm guessing that Kuba is not your real name. We are a fairly friendly bunch here on MSW. We like real names (no pressure). Regards, Henry
  8. popeye2sea
    The Main Stay circumference should be half of the greatest diameter of the Main mast. In order to get the diameter of the main: Thickest part of main mast is at deck level. Diameter equals one inch for every 3 feet of mast length. Main mast length is approx. 2.5 times the beam of the vessel So, for example, vessel has 30 foot beam Main mast length 30 x 2.5= 75 feet Main mast diameter 75 / 3 = 25 inches Main stay circumference 25 / 2 = 12.5 inches Main stay diameter 12.5 / 3.14 = 3.98 inches At 1:36 scale a 4 inch diameter rope will be 0.11 inches or 2.8 mm Hope that helps. Regards,
  9. popeye2sea
    I actually have not painted the inside of mine yet beyond the bit of gold detail that is on the reverse of the medallion. I will be painting them blue to match the outside. The medallion does not actually attach to the bowsprit. In fact these head rails do not sit very well into position at all and there is very little to attach them to. I may even have to pare away some of the round house for the seats of ease in order to make them fit. And I am pretty sure that I have to remake my forward most headrail support timber; it is not long enough to reach the inside of the head rails. All of this adjusting and fiddling is the reason for not painting the inboard side yet. I am thinking that I may also make some small pockets on the inside surface to take the ends of the support timbers in order to make a stronger joint with more glue surface area. Or, I may make small pins to join them. There seems to be a lot of bending stress to get the head rails into place. Regards, Henry
  10. popeye2sea
    Ah, but Constitution is only 30 years younger than Victory. Her original wood will be there for many years to come. Regards, Henry
  11. popeye2sea
    I think red was the cheapest color available. Also the reason most barns in New England are painted red. Regards, Henry
  12. popeye2sea
    USS Constitution still has about 12% of her original wood. Doesn't fit the conundrum. Regards, Henry
  13. popeye2sea
    You are correct. The main halliard knight has the same interference problems. But for the same reasons that Bill mentioned in his post above, I did not move my main halliard knight. Making the collar of the mizzen stay longer around the mast to pass on either side of the halliard will alleviate this problem. The reason I chose to make the change for the fore knight is because the main stay is much more complicated and of much heavier construction than the mizzen stay. Regards. Henry
  14. popeye2sea
    A Tipple of moonshiners. There, I just made one up.😉 Regards, Henry
  15. popeye2sea
    Good job with the re-positioned halliard knight. Regards, Henry
  16. popeye2sea
    Were they talking about the water line or the sheer? Regards, Henry
  17. popeye2sea
    That is the piece. There is also another 2 parts that will come in handy here. One is shaped like a cylinder, the other is a ring. You use them to push the "petals" up evenly so that the tops of the crown can be fixed properly around the base of the lantern. Mine were labelled "x" and "y" and molded in clear plastic. Regards, Henry
  18. popeye2sea
    After having sailed for 24 years in the Navy, one thing I can definitely tell you is that anything that can break loose WILL break loose. I seriously doubt that cannon shot was not secured in some way. Side note: I was always under the impression that like the modern Navy, the ammo stored near the guns is only ready service ammo. Would the cannon balls not be struck below into the shot lockers when not readied for immediate use? Regards, Henry
  19. popeye2sea
    Offer up the quarter gallery to the hull. Lightly run your x-acto blade along the edge to be scraped to make a mark. Scrape along the inside of the line to expose the bare plastic. Regards, Henry
  20. popeye2sea
    Yes, I created floors. It was a bit tricky fitting them. There was a lot of test fitting and trimming required to keep the floors from pushing the quarter galleries out away from the hull. Regards,
  21. popeye2sea
    My starboard side ports are all closed. For the port side gun ports I intend to add hinges to attach the lids that I purchased from Syren. I have not tried them yet. Debating whether to add fleurs-de-lys. My corbels were numbered 150 (8 shorter) and 151 (4 longer). The four longer corbels were positioned 2 under the center of the 2nd battery balcony and 2 under the center of the 3rd battery balcony. The eight shorter ones went to either side of both balconies. Regards, Henry
  22. popeye2sea
    Bill, If you ever need spare parts, I have almost an entire second kit worth. Regards, Henry
  23. popeye2sea
    Just a minor point to add to what Peter said above. When an anchor cable is said to be belayed to the riding bitts, it is not at all similar to belaying a normal line to, say, a cleat. Anchor cables are far too thick for a normal belay. The cable would at most have taken a single turn around the bitts before being led below. The riding bitt, therefore, serves to provide some much needed friction in order to hold the cable. In fact, the cable would almost certainly be constantly monitored and veered or slacked as necessary. The actual securing of the cable was by means of stoppers. Regards, Henry
  24. popeye2sea
    Yes, that is correct. In between the capstan and the hawse hole the cable would be passed around the cable bitts. Sometimes there were stoppers on ring bolts attached to the bitts also. Regards, Henry
  25. popeye2sea
    Does it need to be a Presidential Eagle? Can you use a different representation like a Federal Eagle? Regards, Henry

About us

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

SSL Secured

Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured

NRG Mailing Address

Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917

Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)

Helpful Links

About the NRG

If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.

The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.

The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.

Our Emblem ®

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

Nautical Research Guild ® and the NRG logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,999,236 & No. 6,999,237, registered March 14, 2023)

×
×
  • Create New...