Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I am taking a needed break from my Niagara build (getting bogged down in the minutia), and I decided to build the Harriet Lane, one of the first Coast Guard ships ordered by the US government. She was built in 1857, and I felt her to be an interesting change from building period sailing vessels, what with her dual propulsion - sail and steam. The kit was designed by David Antscherl. It is well documented with an instruction manual containing numerous color photos. It is listed as an advanced build by Model Expo, but I would call it more of an intermediate build (Niagara or the Constitution being an advanced build). 

I ordered and received the kit very quickly. It was packed well within another box, but the shipment had been damaged by the postal service (one end of the box was bashed in) which resulted in the etched brass sheet being damaged. ME replaced this sheet after I used their replacement form, and it arrived within a few days. I verified all parts were present (giving me the chance to become familiar with them), and I skimmed through the manual as well.

I will start the build experience in my next post, as the dinner bell just rang...

Edited by ccoyle
corrected log title

Steve Brock

San Jose, CA

  • The title was changed to USCG Harriet Lane by milosmail - Model Shipways - 1:96 scale
Posted

So far this has been a relaxing build. All kit parts seem to be high quality, although making masts and yards from soft and fragile basswood may not be a good idea. I think I will use some spare dowel material for those components.

Initial work involved separating and cleaning up various frame and bulwark pieces from basswood billets 1-4. This went very quickly and easily. The layout of components attempted to follow the grain of the wood as much as possible, all burns were complete, and components separated easily with a #11 blade. A sanding stick was used to remove char, and glueing proceeded almost without incident through steps 1-2. EXCEPT for bulwark 3! Apparently kits assembled prior to June, 2024 had a couple of problems: bulwark 3 P&S had a notch about 1/8 inch too low, resulting in the bulwark sticking up above deck level. See photo below. I contacted Model Expo, and they have shipped me a new billet with the modified bulwark 3. 

Bulkhead3.jpg.1e498365eb2c1a9b6593084bc56e8abc.jpgstep2.thumb.jpg.69ec2516196a49c106f8dd1e05edbbc9.jpg

 

All the rest of the 15 port and starboard bulkheads fit exactly perfect. Only minimal sanding (basically the wedge created by the laser burn) was needed for an easy fit of the interlocking pieces. I was impressed with the extremely accurate laser results and the guidelines on the wood. I proceeded to install all pairs from bulkhead 4-15, and made 1-2 ready to drop in. I used angle irons to ensure each bulkhead was 90 degrees to the spine.

 

I then went ahead to prepare the inner stem and stern posts, step 3. The text refers to 'curved lines' printed on the wood for guidance in shaping the rabbet at the bow and stern - essentially the defining the area to be tapered from 1/8 inch to 1/16. These lines did not exist on my billets. Having read on the forum that others had encountered this problem which was resolved by Model Shipways, I contacted them and received a .jpg via email which I printed off on my color printer set to approximately the correct scale (117% in the case of my Canon printer). A little trial and error was needed. 

The text suggests transferring to the back side of the wood with tracing paper, but it was much simpler to just cut out a stencil from the printed sheet and trace the borders onto both sides of the components. See photos.

patterns.thumb.jpg.cd7522e5fb8cfd5a2a09c7721e2edc5a.jpg

stencilbow.thumb.jpg.bccca762bafdced5f1e09c74ba5b334b.jpg

 

So, that's as far as I have completed until I get the replacement 'bulwark 3'. 

I guess I go back to fabricating yards for the Niagara until then. Oh well...

Steve Brock

San Jose, CA

Posted

  Many builds of this kit go fine until the guns on carriages (as supplied) don't fit through the cutouts in the bulwark with a level barrel ... they tilt downward a little, causing some to sand the wheel bottoms flat to level the gun barrels (with no chance of elevating them).  Check out the MSW builds.  'Don't know if this phenomenon was ever tweaked in the kit design, but  one builder sanded material off the bottom of the carriages under construction, and deepened the notches for the axle beam accordingly as a fix.  The notches in the carriages for the barrel trunnions might be deepened a bit as well (with a corresponding bit sanded off the tops).

  Thus dry fitting the armaments and tweaking them to fit the designed deck/hull layout before gluing seems wise, instead of pre-building the guns as a side project and presuming they'll fit.  The limited number of guns may be all that the ship had originally for Coast Guard service, but I suppose a second set might be procured to match the increased armament at the start of the Civil War.

Completed builds:  Khufu Solar Barge - 1:72 Woody Joe

Current project(s): Gorch Fock restoration 1:100, Billing Wasa (bust) - 1:100 Billings, Great Harry (bust) 1:88 ex. Sergal 1:65

 

 

 

Posted

Similar to you I decided to take a break from another build. In my case I relocated which meant setting up a new work area and all the hassles involved in moving. When I got settled, I found I lost momentum with my Kate Cory build and decided to work on something "simpler" to get back in the game.  I decided on an older Model Shipways Harriet Lane solid hull, 1/144 scale kit.  I'm often wondering what I was thinking. Can't comment on the 1/96 scale kit but with regards to the cannon fit, it is very important to make sure the bulwarks are the correct height from the deck to accommodate the cannons before adding the decking and rail. Sounds basic but I decided to put a couple of cannons in place to ensure they fit correctly before gluing the decking. Mine did not fit properly and I had to decide to remove more of the wood hull/deck or build up the bulwark. I decided to lower the deck.

 

 

ANMP0002.jpg

Posted

Thanks to both of you for the 'heads up'. 

The Niagara suffers from almost the same problem, but in that case there are 18 guns to adjust. I found this out too late to correct properly, so some of my guns would destroy the bulkhead in real life...

Steve Brock

San Jose, CA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...