ClipperFan

@Luis Felipe I would seriously love to collaborate with you on a first ever accurate recreation of Donald McKay's inaugural extreme clipper ship Stag Hound. Included here are a couple beautiful paintings of her. The Revell box top painting by John Steel isn't accurate at all, since it's meant to portray the model itself. Instead of an elevated forecastle, there's an odd cabin where there never was one. I only incuded it because it's a lovely piece of art which inspired me as a kid. The 2nd painting by James E Buttersworth gives a much better idea of the mammoth size of this premier McKay clipper. In fact, at her late December 1850 launch, she was the largest merchant ship in the world. There are more than enough, precise details to reconstruct her with a great degree of confidence. There's an exact half hull model of her carved by McKay's son Cornelius. William Webb has published her lines. From that, I overlayed her naval hoods, cutwater and leaping golden "stag hound" figurehead. It would be exciting to finally see McKay's most extreme clipper ship finally realized. One caveat, there's some rebuilding of my home that must be done before cold weather sets in and I have to finish the 2nd Nautical Research Journal article. After that, I would have more free time to focus on this.

@gak1965 beautiful rigging work. It sounds like your "beginning to get the shakes" meant that whether you knew it or not, your body is still fighting the Covid-19 infection. In my case, fatigue was the last issue I dealt with before finally kicking Covid-19 entirely. By the way that E. Coli virus pic is particularly nasty looking. It reminds me of a three fingered grasping hand attached to a spade... ugh!

@Rick310 this level of pure craftsman detail is just jaw dropping!

@Rick310 I wish I had 1/4th the raw talent you magnificent craftsmen have. I just want you to know that it's never my intent to criticize, it's only to help. The lubber's holes being longer and wider than those portrayed on the Bluejacket plans make a lot more sense. Besides making it easier to run rigging through them, it also leaves more space for the sailors to get through. Other issues I've been trying to get addressed include a curving wedge shape of the rear coach house. The Alaskan stern Glory of the Seas picture proves this beyond any doubt. Then there's the very plain rear coach house front fascia on those same plans. Again, the highly ornate molded front on Glory of the Seas' rear coach house front fascia with 4 large arched verticle windows is much more in keeping with the central double door, dual carved arch windows portrayed in JE Buttersworth's magnificent Flying Fish painting commissioned by her owners. We also learned during Rob and Vladimir's build, again from one of Michael Mjelde's images was that the front forecastle height was not at the height of the main rail as incorrectly described but actually at the top of the monkey rail above it. There's an article Mike shared with us that stated the measured height on was 5 feet 9 inches from main deck to the inner roof of the forecastle. That same image shows the deck remains level with a gracefully rising bulwark ending with a curved section most likely for belaying pins about 4 feet deep at the very forefront. Another scene of the ship's boy looking towards the fore reveals molded forecastle bulkhead walls. Everything I do, I share the historic images sourced for these determinations.

@Luis Felipe Thanks for sharing the link on the ironclad monitor Huâscar. When I have more free time, I'll investigate her some more. Those were fascinating warships. Can you just imagine the hellish conditions inside them though? The smell of cannon discharge not to mention thick smoke. Add to that the thunderous echoes of cannon balls impacting the iron hull outside. Talk about steel cojones! It's raining here, so I couldn't take my book to get scanned. Meanwhile I took a couple pics with my cell phone. They're not great but it gives you an idea of some of the line drawings. The first is actually from David McGregor's "Fast Sailing Ships." The 2nd is a big 2 page spread and it was very hard to get it right. There are 2 large fold out double sided pages. They should look much better than this scanned. Ironically, as big as Red Jacket was, she was a full 15 feet shorter than McKay's monster clipper Glory of the Seas!

@Luis Felipe Back to your recently completed lovely model, I just came across this beautiful piece of art in Facebook titled "Sir Lancelot Shortening Down" by Roger Desoutter RSMA. Here's a link to the description: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02dWv83n5evognUKG1xxpmHzshohc47V72pb2TbFdSr2RVuJXNX83acz38xrVK2hZHl&id=100085155560377&mibextid=9R9pXO

Roger, It's hard to believe it but the reality is that Rob Wiederrich became fascinated with recreating Donald McKay's last, longest lived medium clipper Glory of the Seas 14 years ago when he greatly modified a Revell 1:96th scale tea clipper Cutty Sark to represent her. At about the same time, without having any communication whatsoever with Rob, I began my own investigation of Glory's true hull appearance. Back then, there was almost no full broadside visual evidence of her lines. However, there was an entire description of her dimensions, published by Michael Mjelde in his first book. It was an article by Duncan McLean, publicist for the Boston Daily Atlas. His source was obviously McKay's shipyard itself. Utilizing those exact specifications I spent months painstakenly sketching her precise dimensions at 1:96 scale. I taped together 3 14" × 17" sheets of paper to do this. Just like Rob's model, my sketch is 33" taffrail to knightheads and an additional 7" for her bowsprit and jibboom. Our reconstruction is far more accurate than any previous attempt, thanks in large measure to Michael Mjelde's priceless contributions of many ultra-rare images not seen in even his publications. Vladimir contributed his CGI talents, literally creating a set of bulkheads similar to and inspired by the basics of the widely popular Bluejacket extreme clipper Flying Fish. After personally seeing Rob's model, author Michael Mjelde said it's the most accurate replica he's ever seen. Still, Michael is so inspired by our combined research efforts that he's actually learning CGI himself to further pursue Glory's accurate underwater bow. Personally, after my own years of living with her hull configuration, I suspect we'll discover that her prow is even sleeker than we've arrived at so far.

and @Luis Felipe A few years ago I bought a new copy of this book directly from Rockland Historical Society, Rockland Public Library, 80 Union Street, Rockland, ME 04841 USA email: library@rocklandmaine.gov. From best memory, my brand new book cost about $68.00 US, including postage. That will be your biggest challenge coming from the USA to Chile. If you're interested, I can see if it's possible to scan some of the plans.

@Vladimir_Wairoa as the old carpenter's adge goes "measure twice, cut once!" However, after our exhausive dig into virtually every nook and cranny of Glory of the Seas I'm quite assured that we have developed enough solid comprehension to more accurately reconstruct many more of Donald McKay's fascinating clippers. Another big American vessel which is well documented is the Maine built clipper Red Jacket which has also been issued as a Bluejacket kit. I have the gorgeous book which has many detailed fold-out plans.

@Luis Felipe if knowing that you have accurate sources for a large American clipper is one of your goals, you probably can't do better than our recent Donald McKay medium clipper Glory of the Seas reconstruction. First, you'll have the benefit of actually seeing literally dozens of ultra rare images of the actual vessel herself, courtesy of author Michael Mjelde who has spent a lifetime researching her and has published three in-depth books on her long successful career. You'll also have the benefit of reading build logs of @rwiederrichwho's spent the last 14 years exhaustively researching and building her in 1:96th scale so accurately that Mr. Mjelde has pronounced she's the most accurate model ever constructed of her. Besides Rob there's also @Vladimir_Wairoa who's currently nearing completion of his monster 1:72nd scale build of her as originally launched. In addition, the Winter Nautical Research Journal has the 1st of two articles on this remarkable effort (I'm writing the 2nd article right now). Finally Vladimir has created both scale bulkheads to make it easier to begin the initial build. It would be fascinating to see a big California clipper in comparison to the Scottish composite tea clipper.

@gak1965 Don't feel bad. After a great 0-13 Covid-19 tests, my perfect record was ruined on the 14th one. Doctors say it was due to staying in a hotel. Fortunately all my shots were up to date. Besides feeling like being run over by a Mack truck, symptoms were fever, some congestion and stomach pains. In a couple weeks, it was over. All that was needed was Tylenol. Your making remarkable progress.

Hi Luis, As the famous saying goes "It ain't necessarily so." By that, I mean the three McKay clippers you mention are not yet accurately modeled. You can check in with Rob Wiederrich or Vladimir Wairora. They will both vouch for my steadfast dedication to accuracy. If your intent is to build an accurate American clipper ship, your best bet is to follow Ed Tosti's phenomenal Young America build. I personally favor Donald McKay's clippers, which I consider more beautiful. Lars Bruzelius has compiled exacting detailed descriptions of Stag Hound, Flying Cloud, Flying Fish, Sovereign of the Seas, James Baines, Champion of the Seas, Lightning and Donald McKay as well as many others. Here's the challenge I've seen with contemporary McKay clipper models. Until Rob's Glory of the Seas build, McKay's unique naval hood, cutwater bow structure hasn't been correctly reproduced. Only the bare stem is depicted on every Flying Cloud, Flying Fish, Sovereign of the Seas and even Lightning models. For this, the culprit is actually Donald McKay himself! He so jealously guarded his nautical secrets that they've been lost to history. For years, I've been researching the actual appearance of these marvelous vessels and they're even more lovely than contemporary models reveal.

Jared, Very nicely done!

Jared, You're welcome for the information. I just wish I could have supplied it to you sooner. Just for the record, I believe the Flying Fish plans are inaccurate. It's most likely due to a lack of available accurate information. Then again, both the Frigate USS Constitution and Whaler Charles W Morgan also share much larger lubber holes and they've been around for decades. Regardless, I'm glad you were able to fix the front of your solid top.

That's fine, Vlad. I was just trying to encourage you not to abandon your love of modeling anyway.

Vlad, The partucular little kit I bought way back in the 70s was Sterling Sloop Ferret. It's probably way below your skill level. Here's a link to another model ship world modified Corel Resolution (Sloop Ferret) kit build which is probably more to your liking:

@gak1965 thanks for sharing a couple more pics of this lovely model. You're right too. Where I've really come to appreciate extensive rigging is with Rob and Vladimir's complex Glory of the Seas line work. I'm in the midst of doing a 2nd write up about the completions of their 2+ year modeling projects. The more I get into it, the more that there seems to be to still cover. Honestly, I don't think I ever realized how complex and painstakenly detailed it is. Yet, of all Donald McKay's wondrous extreme clippers, I have to admit that his double-record setting Flying Cloud is still my favorite. This goes back to it being my earliest Revell model with its stirring box top art as a Christmas gift as a kid. I did a fairly decent job building her but made one crucial mistake. I misread the instructions and painted her entire portico roof red. After she had her sails and rigging I realized too late that the instructions meant just the water buckets and not the roof. Still, she had a lovely, impressive lofty sail profile. In addition, she has the most aggressive bow and waterline profile, very much yacht like. Someday I'd love to rework her hull and deck, incorporating her impressive sail plan. As originally launched, she was a real beauty!

@gak1965 thanks for sharing these wonderful pictures. The large Flying Cloud model is beautiful and impressive. If you have any more pics, I'd love to see them. Of course, just like every other McKay replica, no matter how well crafted, the bow is completely wrong. She's missing her distinctive naval hoods and cutwater and just like all other Flying Fish models (which admittedly is a pet-peeve of mine) the figurehead is tacked on, almost as an afterthought... Here, based on Duncan McLean's actual description of her at launch, is what her prow should actually look like.

@gak1965 thanks for sharing these wonderful pictures. The large Flying Cloud model is beautiful and impressive. If you have any more pics, I'd love to see them.

Bradley, Jared, who's also building Flying Fish is the reason I'm sharing more info on how to avoid the issues he's run into. When it comes to making the solid tops, your MSW plans are wrong. In two significan ways. The lubber's hole on real ships is much larger and longer, whereas the ones on your plans are way too small. Trestletrees blend neatly with the curved front of the solid top, instead of projecting out awkwardly like the plan Jared shares. Here's photographic proof from 3 vessels: clipper ship Glory of the Seas, Whaler Charles W Morgan, Frigate USS Constitution "Old Ironsides." Last 2 pics are what not to do, from Jared's post. I've already shared these images with him to hopefully get him straightened out. ironically, properly recreating this section will make it easier to rig your shrouds too. You're doing a remarkable job. It's never my intent to criticize anyone's work. I'm just doing my best to provide historically accurate information to aid in your recreations.

@campbewj your painted and coppered Flying Fish hull looks beautiful. Since it's been well over a year from your last update, I hope all is well with you and your family. Jared who's also well on his way to finishing his clipper just ran into an issue with his solid tops. My hope is to share accurate info with you so that you can avoid Jared's problem. The MSW plans for solid tops have 2 errors. First, the crosstrees intersect the lubber's hole, creating 4 small rectangles, which isn't right. Reviewing 3 actual ships reveals that there's a long, uninterrupted lubber's hole. Second, according to Jared's "Mastini" plan, the trestletree projects awkwardly beyond the semi-circular top above. However, the foremast on Glory of the Seas shows that the trestletrees below blend in harmoniously with the solid top above. Images are 3 of Glory of the Seas , 2 of USS Constitution "Old Ironsides" a single shot of the Whaler Charles W Morgan and finally 2 of Jared's incorrect plans. Having this accurate info should allow you to rig shrouds easier too.

Wawona59 remember this when you get to building your solid tops. This is an area where the MSW Flying Fish plans are wrong. This has caused issues for other modelers which I hope to help you avoid. The first 3 pics are of the foremast top from Glory of the Seas, courtesy of 3 time author Michael Mjelde. The 4th is directly below the solid top of the Whaler Charles W Morgan, 5th and 6th are of the Frigate USS Constitution "Old Ironsides." Finally, the last 2 show how another modeler Jared, is right now documenting his problems following wrong advice! All actual vessels show a large, unobstructed lubbers hole which covers the entire inner solid top on the merchant vessels and most of it on the military one. Meanwhile, the inacurrate FF Mastini plans show crosstrees bisecting the lubber hole which doesn't match any pics of the real ships. The clipper ship's trestle trees blend in harmoniously with her solid tops above and does not project awkwardly in front like the plans incorrectly show. In this case, accurately reproducing these features will make it easier to rig shrouds too.

@Rick310 additional images of solid tops. First two are of "Old Ironsides" and the last is of the Whaler. That's three ships which have substanttial lubber holes, enough for all shrouds to easily be rigged through while leaving sufficient room for crew to climb through. I realize you haven't proceeded to this point in your build but my hope is this guides you in the right direction when you do.

@Rick310 Jumping ahead to the solid tops on clipper Flying Fish. I hope to save you from repeating the same mistake that other modelers have struggled with. Again, I will refer to the priceless, authentic rare Glory of the Seas images that author Michael Mjelde has shared with us from his sixty-plus years collection. However, this time there are contemporary images as well that support this structural accuracy. Here's photographic evidence on how to precisely build your tops. You definitely want to disregard any plans that look like the last "Mastini" illustration which is wrong. Two major errors in the "Mastini" plan: lubber holes are bisected by crosstree structural members and the trestle tree juts beyond the semi-circular top which rests above them. Glory of the Seas is proof that the trestle tree blends harmoniously with the solid top above and the generous lubber hole extends uninterrupted, clear across the entire solid top. It's hard to see but the close up seems to show a part of the crosstree cut off to form the lubber hole. Next I'll share images of "Old Ironsides" USS Constitution fighting top as well as the Whaler Charles W Morgan which has a similar solid top.

Jared, I have good news and bad news. Good news is that I have more definitive proof to thoroughly and accurately recreate a McKay top. The bad news is it means you would have to rework your tops one last time. Here's the low down. The "Mastini" top illustration is wrong, at least for a McKay clipper. The actual foretop on Glory of the Seas shows that the trestle tree blends in neatly with the semi-circular top, it does not jut out awkwardly like the "Mastini" sketch incorrectly shows. In addition, on the real ship, crosstrees are cut out to create a very generous "lubber's hole" which goes clear across the inside of the top. As opposed to the interrupted little squares as drawn in the "Mastini" sketch. That too is wrong. Besides Glory of the Seas and USS Constitution the Whaler Charles W Morgan also share these very similar strucural features. Getting this right has been an ongoing challenge to Rob Wiederrich, Vladimir who both had to revise their tops, yourself and possibly others who are now building Flying Fish. This should be the definitive answer. It also should make it a lot easier to rig this area too.