-
Posts
216 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by ddp
-
the model is riding to low which means the model is to heavy. even the red part of the hull is to high as the waterline should be just above the prop not as high as yours, even the plan's author's model is riding higher then yours. the plans i linked before shows all that info.
- 33 replies
-
- Puncher
- escort carrier
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
i think your model has to much weight causing it to ride low so that even on calm water, the wave action is almost getting into the bow area when compared to this link. https://www.navsource.net/archives/03/0305307.jpg https://www.navsource.net/archives/03/053.htm
- 33 replies
-
- Puncher
- escort carrier
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
warm water with dish detergent, rubbing alcohol or both then sun light for 30 plus minutes.
-
i know that the platform is to overhang but the upper half of the tower is not to overhang but be vertical flush with the lower half of the tower.
-
to me kitbashing is when modifying a model's appearance to look totally different from the original appearance like these. kitbashing Revell's 1/429 scale USS Arizona into the OBBs(old battleships) of ww2 from the Wyoming class to the Colorado class. on the 2nd item, look at this link which is of the real ship as it shows that halfmoon projection that Canute says were it should be. http://www.navsource.net/archives/01/016384a.jpg in this cropped view of the forward superstructure from Missouri's Booklet of General Plans 1944 that i linked above, you can see that except for the different platforms, the vertical front face of the tower is vertically aligned flush unlike yours which is sticking out past the lower part of the tower.
-
what i am calling the base which the tower is sitting on is actually the "secondary conning station". look at these plans as there is a problem to your model in in that area & maybe more. BB-63 USS Missouri Booklet of General Plans (1944) https://archive.org/details/bb63bogp1944 https://archive.org/details/ship-design-drawings?tab=collection&query=uss+missouri http://www.navsource.net/archives/01/63a.htm
-
is the section of the forward superstructure circled in red glued to the section circled in yellow because if yes then there are some problems. 1: the red section is to far forward causing it to overhang the yellow section as both sections' faces should be vertically flush. 2: the red section minus it's base platform is in reverse in that the flat front should be towards the bow & the rounded angled back should be facing the stern.
-
you must be glad that you also did not glue them solid as then that would be an extremely serious problem to try to fix.
- 212 replies
-
if your model had the 2 rudders & 4 props like the real ship had, then your model might have handled better then it currently does.
- 212 replies
-
should have put the lead shot into bags so can be removable til all work is done so you would know what lead weight is needed to get the model down to the correct waterline.
- 212 replies
-
is that hull warped from the swimming pool deck to below the port holes to the right of the clear tape holding the decks to the hull?
- 11 replies
-
- Rex
- Old Model Kits
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
the layout & shape of the aft superstructure appears to be wrong according to these links. Starboard view off Norfolk Navy Yard, 3 June 1942. http://www.navsource.net/archives/01/015560.jpg November, 1944. http://navsource.net/archives/01/055/015515g.jpg in 1945. Line drawing by A.L. Raven http://www.navsource.net/archives/01/015596.jpg http://www.navsource.net/archives/01/55a.htm
-
Ian, do both props spin in the same direction or does 1 spin right & the other spins left?
- 212 replies
-
would not the motor go in reverse if you reverse the polarity with the battery?
- 212 replies
-
the Princess Royal outboard/inboard drawing i have on my computer as fitted does not show anything in the spotting top.
- 212 replies
-
try this as they had to replace server & site domain. https://www.navsource.net/archives/02/06.htm
- 154 replies
-
- Enterprise
- Trumpeter
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
here is some more. if you want larger versions of the drawings i had posted as site might limit posted file size then i need your email address so i can send them to you.
- 97 replies
-
- Curtis Wilbur
- I Love Kit
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.