Jump to content

HMS Victory by Bill97 - FINISHED - Heller - 1/100 - PLASTIC


Recommended Posts

Ian this is a good close up photo. I don’t remember who it is from. May be your’s. It shows a number of the lines and the jib boom traveller. My thimbles on the traveller may be a little to big maybe. I also notice that in this photo that the jibsail line is tied to the loop (#3 in the diagram) on top the traveller. I understood Longridge’s instruction to tie the outhauler to that. Is that wrong?  If so where does the hauler attach to the traveller.

20C964CF-17E6-4315-9A20-D0856FAA526E.jpeg

Edited by Bill97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Gingerterry said:

This kind of leads me to think that it may have been retooled recently to address people's reviews

I bought my kit about 10 years back and the quality of the pressings is/was pretty good, very little flash, few sinkholes and good detail. The issue with the deadeyes is the design rather than moulding, they don’t have a groove around the edge for rope to sit in. The wood grain is always going to be debatable, at this scale it would be invisible and people often sand this back on the hull especially. On the whole I’d say it’s a much better quality kit that the revell Cutty Sark and is holding up well. That said, it would be a shame for them to retool exactly as is. They could lift the kit up to ‘superb’ by redesigning a few bits. Though maybe that would take all the fun out of it!

Kevin

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/ktl_model_shop

 

Current projects:

HMS Victory 1:100 (Heller / Scratch, kind of active, depending on the alignment of the planets)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/23247-hms-victory-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic-with-3d-printed-additions/

 

Cutty Sark 1:96 (More scratch than Revell, parked for now)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/30964-cutty-sark-by-kevin-the-lubber-revell-196

 

Soleil Royal 1:100 (Heller..... and probably some bashing. The one I'm not supposed to be working on yet)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/36944-le-soleil-royal-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK Bill I managed to confuse myself re-reading about xxxhaul lines last night but now I have it sorted.

 

That photo is not mine; it is incorrectly rigged. As shown on pg 235 the jib stay attaches to a thimble which is located between the arms of the shackle for the outhaul.

 

Yes your thimbles are too big. I used eyes cut off from my etched brass eyebolts. For the flying traveller I gave up and had no thimbles.

 

As for rigging, I now remember that by mistake I rigged the jib outhaul using the block on the left side of the traveller, which should have been for the downhaul. But after realizing this I just decided to leave it and rig the downhaul to starboard. The run-off effect of this was I rigged the flying outhaul to starboard, not to port, since they're supposed to be on opposite sides. So don't get misled by my earlier comments above regarding the jib outhaul being to port.

 

But I made another mistake. For the outhauls, the block on the bowsprit cap should be on its lower front face, not the side. See Longridge pg 234, "....a single 9in block, hooked to an eyebolt in the lower end of the fore face of the bowsprit cap." This makes sense since the outhaul exits the sheave at the bottom of the round jib boom. On the same page he states two sentences later that the standing end of the inhaul is made fast to an eyebolt in starboard side of the bowsprit cap i.e. the opposite side of the outhaul.

 

The jib outhaul eyebolt being on the front face of the cap is shown by Petersson in the drawing I posted in post #804.

 

So to summarize, you need two eyebolts at the lower end of the front face of the cap, each having a single block attached. Port is for the jib outhaul, starboard for the flying jib outhaul. You also need an eyebolt on each side of the cap. Port is for the flying jib inhaul, starboard for the jib inhaul.

 

When you make your flying traveller the block on its right is for the flying downhaul, its left for the flying outhaul i.e. opposite to the jib traveller. Longridge did not show a drawing for the flying traveller.

 

As for the outhaul tending to lie in the thimble for the martingale at the bottom of your traveller, I would simply tweak it to port since it uses the port eyebolt on the cap's front face.

 

One more thing to note - all flying jib lines running in and out along the bowsprit must pass above the sprit topsail yard or it would not be possible to set the sail.

 

Good luck Mr. Phelps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks my friend. This does make since now. You are a great teacher. Ought to teach a class on this subject. I told my wife yesterday that when I started the Victory I had no intention of learning all the ins and outs or reasons for ship rigging. As with my other builds, it was just to assemble an attractive model to display. It had always been glue this line from here to there and from time to time pass through a pulley maybe. No real idea what all those lines do or why. Just follow the instructions. No one who has ever viewed my ships is very knowledgeable of rigging and therefore have never said “you know that rigging line right there is wrong”. They just usually say “wow Bill these ships are beautiful!” and that is about it. Now that I am working on the Victory with your help and guidance, along with Kevin, OC, Daniel, Marc, and others, my eyes have been opened to a whole new exciting world of engineering although often very frustrating. As someone who during my younger working years was a craftsman I find this fascinating and love it. I find myself saying to myself “this is going to take forever!”  Then I realize and say “so what, what if it does you have no where to be.” Someday it will be complete and everything I learn will help tremendously when I start the Soleli Royal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill, I keep meaning to ask, now that you're in the thick of rigging, were those blocks any good? I really won't be in the least offended if you said no or they are a complete PITA. I mostly want to know because I'm quite close to having to attach my own deadeyes to my new pin rails on the CS and if it turns out they fail or have other big shortcomings, better that I know now.

 

I'm having a lot of fun with the CS. New deck trials have gone really well, same with pin rails etc. I'll post about it again soon but, unsurprisingly, I'm ending up spending a lot longer on it than planned. I guess that's inevitable when every step is a learning exercise. I still wouldn't know a gusset from a gannet though.

 

My but you're making strides on the rigging, and it lifts the model so much, doesn't it.

Kevin

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/ktl_model_shop

 

Current projects:

HMS Victory 1:100 (Heller / Scratch, kind of active, depending on the alignment of the planets)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/23247-hms-victory-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic-with-3d-printed-additions/

 

Cutty Sark 1:96 (More scratch than Revell, parked for now)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/30964-cutty-sark-by-kevin-the-lubber-revell-196

 

Soleil Royal 1:100 (Heller..... and probably some bashing. The one I'm not supposed to be working on yet)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/36944-le-soleil-royal-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Kevin. How have you been. Your blocks are great. I have not used to many of them yet because in prep for the Victory I had purchased a bunch of wood blocks and deadeyes. I plan to use the ones you sent me for my Soleli Royal. However, I have found that if I am careful I can drill out the center of the small deadeyes you made me and use them as thimbles. I have used some for that purpose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh good, glad some of them are proving useful. I’ll recycle the files for the CS. By the time I get back to the Victory I’ll probably have added to the collection, like you I hadn’t even heard of thimbles. I think for ultra-small sizes you’re probably better off with wood anyway and I can see myself buying these. I bought the stern decoration for CS from Hismodel a couple of weeks back and he included some samples of his tiny deadeyes, which are works of art. In a similar vein, I saw some Cornwall model boat brass stanchions and other parts at the weekend which were also impressive.

 

Kevin

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/ktl_model_shop

 

Current projects:

HMS Victory 1:100 (Heller / Scratch, kind of active, depending on the alignment of the planets)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/23247-hms-victory-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic-with-3d-printed-additions/

 

Cutty Sark 1:96 (More scratch than Revell, parked for now)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/30964-cutty-sark-by-kevin-the-lubber-revell-196

 

Soleil Royal 1:100 (Heller..... and probably some bashing. The one I'm not supposed to be working on yet)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/36944-le-soleil-royal-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes that is a good visual summary of my previous post.

 

You're right about it seeming odd that each inhaul is on the opposite side from the associated outhaul. I think I was wrong again....sheesh. The jib traveller pg 235 has the inhaul block to starboard. The belay diagram pg 266 lists the jib inhaul on a timberhead slightly to starboard of centre. So far so good since we also have the inhaul eyebolt to starboard.  But it lists the jib outhaul belayed also to starboard. I think I got confused because mine was to port by mistake as I said before.

 

So, to correct myself yet again 🙄, on your diagram just swap the connections to your two blocks on the front of the cap. That makes more sense and leads more conveniently to the belaying points given on pg 266.  All your guys etc are correct as shown. The block at top left is flying inhaul not outhaul.

 

The only remaining "funny" I see is that the downhauls remain on the opposite sides from their associated in- and outhauls. 🤪   This seems unavoidable since the downhaul and inhaul blocks are on opposite sides of the travellers. Unless they crossed the downhauls over the bowsprit somewhere? We'll never know as Longridge omitted them.

 

God only knows where I eventually belayed them all.....evidently I don't!

 

Bill, sorry for all the confusion. Order, counter-order, dis-order!

Edited by Ian_Grant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Ian don’t apologize I am so thankful. I may find myself doing the same when I start the mast. Rather get it straight on paper before actually rigging. And I guess the rigging process on the flying jib traveller as far as the inhaul and outhaul lines are the same?

Edited by Bill97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kevin the CS was my second build several years ago after I got back into the craft. The Constitution being the first. What a long way I feel I have come since then. I am so anxious to see what an artist like you can do with it. If your blocks and deadeyes, which I have had the fortune of using, are any indication of what you can do your CS is going to be fantastic. Will enjoy watching your build. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the new Heller instructions for the Soleli Royal and looking at it I wish I had the new instructions for the Victory primarily for the rigging instructions. Fortunately there are plenty of builders here on MSW who graciously share their expertise. With their help I can not justify spending even more to purchase the new instructions. Last I saw it is rather expensive. But if you can afford it, it is well worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Bill97 said:

the CS was my second build

I probably should have made it my first to begin with, it's a little easier than the Victory, so long as I don't go too mad with remakes. The range of ships in this scale is a bit limited, isn't it, and whatever you go for first you're likely to end up with a few challenges.

Kevin

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/ktl_model_shop

 

Current projects:

HMS Victory 1:100 (Heller / Scratch, kind of active, depending on the alignment of the planets)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/23247-hms-victory-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic-with-3d-printed-additions/

 

Cutty Sark 1:96 (More scratch than Revell, parked for now)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/30964-cutty-sark-by-kevin-the-lubber-revell-196

 

Soleil Royal 1:100 (Heller..... and probably some bashing. The one I'm not supposed to be working on yet)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/36944-le-soleil-royal-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok gentlemen another technical question. The spritsail topsail yard attaches to the Jibboom with a parrel, not the flying Jibboom correct?  The jib traveller goes on the Jibboom. Therefore I would expect that the jib traveller should be set further out the Jibboom than where the spritsail topsail yard is positioned, or does that matter?  I have seen pictures where the traveller is behind the topsail yard and others where it is in front. Which is correct, or is either?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Touche!! (Don't know how to put the accent over the "e").

 

Don't know where that's from, and I only have a few books, but Hackney, Longridge, and Lees place the traveller out near the end of the jib boom. It is also placed there in Geoff Hunt's many paintings of Victory (I have his book "The Marine Art of Geoff Hunt").  In fact, Lees mentions that the traveller was abolished about 1815, and the jib stay just led through a sheave at the end of the jib boom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can check to see if I have the date I ordered mine and when i received it. 

 

Daniel (Dafi) mailed mine on June 21st and I got in the mail July 19th.  If you ask him here or message him he can tell you the current processing time from when you order and he drops it in the mail (Deutschland Post).

Edited by Bill97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continuing to rig the bowsprit. Based on your direction Ian I have completed a good part of it. Still some to go. Still have to figure out the routes of the downhaulers. Don’t tell Adm Nelson but I changed the timber heads that I am belaying the lines to in order to get more direct straight lines that don’t cross each other. Since I replaced the flying jib with a brass rod I did not have a shrive at the tip to run a thread through so I simply tied on a block to serve the purpose. 

98F7D9ED-48E6-4427-B50A-3C76DBEB4714.jpeg

9F471BFD-0222-4944-82EE-A23F828522C1.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took a break from running rigging lines around the bowsprit and decided to install the lower deadeyes for the shrouds. Got Daniel’s etched plate #3 that has the brass chains and wood deadeyes. Used a thread around each mast head to try to get the deadeye holes to line up so when I rig the upper and lower deadeyes together the threads will run at an angle toward the mast. Got them installed on the port side. Still need to add all the chains under the channels. 

0C1CCDE3-FDB7-4A6C-A0F9-796A276BE1DB.jpeg

800C001E-1657-44D2-BD16-C95CE9BBE063.jpeg

BE0BDEB4-8E33-4FFD-A019-6C02A7B85B41.jpeg

05E78FAD-CD22-49CD-AA3E-7D895EF52F22.jpeg

58482386-8BBB-4837-BE66-16FF3E55F291.jpeg

8F1D811A-4392-4765-9573-24A4F54C84B4.jpeg

D798356A-F384-4C58-9ECE-DBA70A0F24FF.jpeg

Edited by Bill97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...