Jump to content

Hubac's Historian

NRG Member
  • Posts

    3,288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hubac's Historian

  1. Coming along nicely Bill. Your paint lines are crisp, and that’s a huge improvement to the kit staircases.
  2. Hi Dan - just checking-in, here. How is your cross-section progressing?
  3. This is just beautiful, clean work, Mark. I love the careful spiling of your planking on the round-tuck stern. This is a very difficult thing to do seamlessly, and you nailed it. I am also interested in the middle strakes of your hull planking, just below the main deck level, which appear to have the chatoyant character of alternating grain. If this was selected deliberately, you chose well. It looks fantastic!
  4. A number of you have reached out and said a lot of really complimentary things about the work on these railings, and the model in general. That is very meaningful to me, and I really appreciate it! I do want to take a minute, though, and talk a little bit about process, as there may be people watching along through all of this and thinking “well, I could never do anything quite like THAT.” My resounding reply to anyone who may be feeling that way is that you absolutely can achieve these things. While it is true that I have developed fine motor skills over the course of my lifetime, and they are essential, I think what is often considered “talent” largely boils down to one’s powers of observation. Here is what I mean. Whether it be 17th Century French warships, or 18th Century American longrifles, or Art Nouveau furniture - to name my three most passionate period interests - I think it is essential to constantly be on the search for previously unknown and increasingly better examples of these things, so that you can better appreciate what constitutes Good, Better and Best (Israel Sack’s guide to period furniture) examples of any given type. This is why I love scrolling through Pinterest so much. Every so often, the algorithm sends me a gift of something I had never seen before! More than any other skill that I posses, I believe it is my ability to really home-in on, and scrutinize the details of a thing, that has enabled me to recreate them with reasonable verisimilitude to their times. I really pore over drawings and photographs for excessively long periods of time, and often revisit them until I understand the details well enough to actually draw them. This has always been my litmus test; when I can finally clearly visualize something in my mind’s eye well enough to draw it in a clear and detailed way - then, I absolutely know that I can make that thing. Perfection is never my goal. All aspects of this model, or anything I have made, are slightly irregular. What I am trying to achieve, though, is the uniform application of my powers of observation, in concert with my dexterities to the object in-hand. In other words: I am committed to maintaining a certain standard of execution. The more contemporary models you look at, the more you will come to realize that they all have in-common these slight irregularities of shape and proportion. This is why the project has carried on for as long as it has. Soleil Royal is a magnificently complicated vessel, and I have endeavored to include as much of that detail as I reasonably can. The QD breast rail is emblematic of this process. When you really study it, you can find all manner of a-symmetries: However, as with painting, it is my habit to work an individual panel, for example; get it fretted pretty close to where I want it to end up; regularly flip the work from front to back to make sure I’m not cutting out of square; and, finally, to come back and re-work each panel so that they are as consistent as I can make them. The secret to all of this is just time. I enjoy the process, so the enormous amounts of time I spend whittling away don’t really matter too much. In closing, all of these things you see me doing were learned right here in the process of making THIS very model. My skills have improved tremendously over that span of time. These things are achievable. You can do them too, and the process of learning to opens doors to what you are capable of within the hobby. You are suddenly no longer constrained by whatever kit manufacturers deem profitable enough for manufacture. Thank you for indulging my reverie. All the best, Marc
  5. Thank you, Gentlemen. I am continually amazed by what 3D printing now makes possible, however, I always like the slight irregularities of a handmade thing. For me, this is the fun part of the hobby; you start out with scraps of sheet plastic, and at the end of it you have a super-detailed breast rail.
  6. I have decided to keep my momentum going, and I am currently in the process of designing and making my QD breast rail. In a moment of pre-install vanity, here is the f’ocsle belfry placed: I wanted to be sure that the scale of the thing looked right, although I did mock-up the main stay during the design process and the top of the belfry is well below it. With the Louis Quinz model as my reference, I think it looks just about right: photos courtesy of Marc Yeu Continuing the theme of bringing the outboard details, inboard, I used the main deck level balcony rail as my design reference: The wonderful part of this hobby is that you are constantly learning and refining technique: In order to more uniformly draw the three port side lattice frames, I realized I could create a series of reference lines (diagonals and a mid-line) that would help me to layout these shapes in a consistent way. I was lucky that I still had six oval cartouches that I could extract from the kit QGs. It was necessary, though, for me to cast another name cartouche out of BONDO, which came out with perfect casted detail. The oval cartouches are cast with tiny fleur-de-lis. On each side of the central panel, I will engrave the central ovals with the crossed-Ls monogram of Louis XIV, while the outer ovals will remain fleurs. Little by little, we are getting there! Thank you for visiting the build! Bonus - I found this amazing VdV portrait of an unknown Dutch two-decker. I just love the beautiful silhouette these Dutch ships cut on the water:
  7. Thank you, Dan! Although knees can be difficult to rehab, it is good that you are doing this sooner, rather than later. In fact, once you have fully rehabbed, you will probably wonder why you waited so long. To be free of that sort of pain is transformational!
  8. I’ve been plugging away on this f’ocsle breast rail and belfry, here and there, when I can. I made enough BONDO scroll ornaments so that I didn’t have any difficulty selecting for the best and most consistent examples: I coat them with a little thin CA, once they’re in place, just as a precaution - in case there were any micro fissures or fractures. The belfry came together sequentially. Turning the bell took a few attempts. I overheated the plastic, on the first try, and the bell winged-out on me. I made the cap rail from a couple of layers to give me a thickness of 3/64ths. It was necessary to fit a center section of caprail to the belfry assembly. The side sections will be mortised for the timberheads, and joined to the center section later. All-in-all, I’m really pleased with how it’s coming along: As always, thank you for taking time out to look-in at this build. More to come…
  9. You have really made a lot of progress, here, Mark. Just beautiful work all around!
  10. Well, I’m happy to report that the BONDO experiment was a success! I made a few fleur and shell casts to see how the material might release from the moulds. They released with even less effort than the Allumalite resin castings. As with the resin, small air pockets were an issue, but the crispness of detail was very satisfying, overall. For the squiggly scrolls, I decided to press a small amount of BONDO into the moulds with the pad of my finger, hoping to press out any air pockets. I then applied a thin backing layer so that I’d have something to hold onto, as I wasted away the ground. This time, perfect castings: Wasting was easy with the Dremel drum sanding attachment, followed by lap sanding across a sanding stick with finger pressure. Checking against a back-light, you can see where the ground is thicker or thinner, and you can adjust your finger pressure accordingly. You sand until you can just begin to see the castings releasing from the ground. I cleaned up a set to see what they looked like on a panel. I’m on the fence about this, at the moment: I also took some time to trim the panels so that they fit precisely within the parameters of the drawing. Because all 6 panels are produced from only two master drawings, they don’t all perfectly mirror to the other side of the drawing. A little fine-tuning was necessary: I made the yoke for the bell. The iron bands are simply black construction paper: I’ve also made the six breast-rail stanchions. I realized that the knees I patterned (left stanchion) were a little too heavy and out of scale, so I trimmed them back a bit (right): I guess I didn’t save the bell (90’s reference), so I’ll have to turn one from Screetch! RIP, Dustin Diamond
  11. Wow - I never realized just how out of alignment the beakhead is!
  12. Nicely done drawings, EJ. Now, though, I’m going to be a genuine PITA, once again. Why no deck camber? In smaller scales, this omission is less noticeable, but your model will be quite large and this will jump out at the viewer because - apart from the practical purpose of watershed, all elements of the ‘tween decks bulkheads will read very flat. These early 17th C. ships are all about the curves. For the sake of no-one will ever see it, I can see not worrying about the lower decks, but the visible decks are a different level of consideration, IMO. I mention these things because you are early in the build, and have time to consider them. It’s a big project, and I don’t mean to be annoying, but I want you to be happy with the results of your labor.
  13. Yeah, that’s what I was seeing in those early pictures. Sounds like you have it all well in-hand.
  14. Well, that’s just the thing - if you continue setting frames on this current base, and then lock them in with your battens, then whatever distortion all of that frame weight introduces to your keel will also be locked-in. I think you will be safer and far less aggravated, in the future, to start from a truly flat and solid base. This ship will be heavy.
  15. Over that span, EJ, I have some concern that your keel plinth and mounting board aren’t up to the long-term task of keeping your keel straight, as the hull takes shape.
  16. As they say - don’t allow the “perfect” to be the enemy of the really very good.
×
×
  • Create New...