Jump to content

realworkingsailor

Members
  • Posts

    3,091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by realworkingsailor

  1. You’re talking to an old hand when it comes to decals😉😁 I have some Testors Glosscote and Dulcote on hand for just such an eventuality (as well as Microsol setting solutions). And as for weathering I do have these: I have all kinds of things hidden in my stash… 😁😁 Andy
  2. Thanks everyone, although I had hopes of a more philosophical discussion regarding stripes, I still appreciate all the kind remarks!😁 Well, nerves wracked, or otherwise, the masking tape came off this afternoon. Big sigh of relief, it worked: Very little touch up to do, and most of that is on the engine nacelle forward ends (and those parts are only yet held on by poster putty, so easy to fix). I'm very happy with the way it turned out, hopefully the experts will agree. The sacrificial canopy and window masks will stay on for a while yet, at least until after the decals are applied and sealed. I can't express how relieved I am, and I can't believe how close I am to finishing. Still a bit of work to do on the engines, and other small details, but I think this is now the single largest task behind me. Whew! Andy PS Hopefully We get some brighter weather soon, it's rather dull and gloomy right now, not good for photography.
  3. So this now begs the existential question: Were RAF aircraft brown with green stripes or green with brown stripes? Something to ponder over. All masked up and ready for the black. (Sitting in my improvised, cut-down, Triscuit crackers box paint stand 😁) Andy
  4. Hello everyone, thanks for all the likes! A small-ish update for today, first paint has been applied. Always a bit nerve wracking (Have I forgotten anything? Is this masking enough? Hopefully this works🤞). Anyway, worries aside, it was time: This feels like a mail order modeller's worst nightmare... "What can Brown do for you?" A little bit more curing, and it will be time to mask up for the green camo pattern, and bring to an end this horrible UPS ad... Andy
  5. You can get away with a little bit more when brush painting, but, yeah, you’re apt to get better results if you use a properly compatible thinner. Andy
  6. I had never heard or read that, I had to do a little digging. Although it’s not clearly stated, I suspect it’s possibly due to people leaving their airbrushes (or parts) soaking in Windex for a couple of days or more. I’ve sprayed enough straight Windex when cleaning and I’ve not noticed any loss of chrome on my airbrush. Andy
  7. Hi Popeye! I was feeling very liked this morning, now I know why 😁 Glad to have you aboard, and that you’re enjoying learning about how the other half did things. Thanks for the kind words, hopefully I can live up to all expectations! Andy
  8. I am far from being an expert, and it's been a few years, but I do have some experience airbrushing with acrylic. I agree that acrylics are not the easiest to spray, you have to really know your equipment, and what adjustments can be made to achieve a desired result (different sized needles, air pressures, those sorts of things). I can begin to make suggestions as every airbrush is different in construction and adjustment, so it's something that each person should become familiar with on their own. Not to go on a rant or anything, but I've seen what I consider to be misleading information/advice floating around MSW regarding acrylics and thinners. I've seen people swear up and down that acrylics can be thinned down with water with no problems. This is not a good approach for airbrushing. Most hobby acrylics that I've painted with use some form of glycol ethers or isobutanol as their solvents. These are types of alcohol that evaporate readily in air (which is why hobby acrylics cure quickly), and because alcohol and water do mix, after a fashion, it's given rise to the myth that acrylics are "water based". Thinning acrylics down to a consistency suitable for airbrushing using water will break down the paint matrix. Acrylic binders do not dissolve in water (otherwise you could clean up dried acrylic paint with it), and by diluting the alcohol, the curing process begins (which leads to gummed up airbrushes). The trick with airbrushing is to use a compatible thinner that will forestall this curing process as long as possible. I've used thinners made specifically for the paint I was using, or, for a cheaper alternative, window cleaner, such as Windex. I've never had any issues with the blue tint of Windex affecting the paint colour, even white. I think it's safe to say, with a properly adjusted airbrush and correctly thinned paint, airbrushing with acrylics can be relatively hassle free. For what its worth, I painted the tuscan red on this brass model railway car with acrylics (thinned with Windex) using a Grex GenisisXT airbrush (the primer was rattle can Tamiya): Andy
  9. In between messing with the motors, I've been also slowly getting things ready for painting. Installing the numerous windows has been fairly straight forward. As I discussed way back at the beginning, I will leave these clear so there's at least some view of the interior. Although the window is not glued in yet, the bomb aimer's window had a little extra PE framing to be added. I've seen a few up-close images of this area on the prototype and the framing is quite prominent. I'm surprised that Airfix didn't include that detail, but I guess for simplicity it was omitted. I do intend to model the aircraft as it may have appeared on the ground, bomb bay, crew entry and cockpit windows open. I was worried how I was going to be able to effectively mask all these areas. Thankfully there are many options on how to finish the plane, and plenty of extra parts. I figure with a little bit of poster putty I can secure some of these parts in their proper openings, temporarily, to make masking off these areas easier. The landing gear doors fit rather snugly, so there's no need there. The crew hatch just needed a little modification of the mounting tabs and it slotted in nicely. Only the bomb bay is rather loose. One of the areas requiring careful though was how to paint aircraft while showing the cockpit windows open (side window slid back). Following the convention of installing the windows, masking and then painting, I would have been left with a large, unsightly grey square where the window would sit (the recess just behind the canopy in the above photo). For whatever reason, beyond the two option of windows open or closed, Airfix provided a third canopy, probably for a different variant model. Anyway, this will be a sacrificial canopy to safely cover the cockpit. I've also made up some styrene plugs to cover mounting holes to be later occupied by details I'm worried will be too fragile, or at risk of getting snagged while masking/painting (spray paint will exploit any weakness in masking are droplets could end up anywhere inside). Things are quickly coming together, and I was just taking stock of what parts were left on the styrene sprues. (Not many!) Andy
  10. A small progress update. The propellor shaft lengthening has been a success. I ended up using some 1/16" brass rod that I just happened to have kicking around. It's a little bit thicker than the cast propellor shaft, so I did have to drill out the prop hub, but otherwise everything has worked out (prop spins freely, and there's more than enough to glue on the spinner). I blackened the new shaft as well as the exhaust manifold mounting brackets (fiddly tiny fold-y pieces): There are three brackets required per engine. Speaking of the exhaust manifold, I've been having a little fun getting that piece ready. On the prototype these manifolds appear to be unpainted, for obvious reasons, and I wanted to replicate a little bit of the heat action on the metal. Airfix would have you simply paint them a "gun metal" colour, and Eduard says to paint them "stainless steel". My approach was to first paint the cowling a silver/aluminium colour. For the second layer I dry-brushed some Floquil brass. I drew this very thin coat down almost the full depth of the manifold. This was then followed by a dry brushed coat of Floquil copper. I tried to keep this focused more along the front of the manifold. Overall I think the effect works: It's not quite as red as it appears in the above photo (and that large silvery area on the right is a result of the natural light). For the most part I'm satisfied with how things are going so-far, I may add another thin dry brush coating of blueish gunmetal colour, but I'll do a trial first on some scrap before I commit. Andy
  11. Thanks everyone for the comments and likes! Work has begun on the engines. The Wellington Mk I, Mk Ia and Mk Ic was equipped with a 9 cylinder Bristol Pegasus engine, the main production variant producing just over 1000hp. Versions like the Mk II used Rolls Royce Merlin X, the Mk III and Mk X versions used variants of the Bristol Hercules developing up to 1600hp. A small number of Wellingtons (the Mk IV variant) even used Pratt And Whitney Twin Wasp engines. As there were only 200 or so built, photos of this variant are hard to come by. Both the Hercules and Pegasus engines had forward mounted exhaust manifolds that formed part of the streamlined engine cowling. I imagine this was designed to provide for improved cooling, but it makes for easy spotting as the exhaust pipes emerge from the from of the engine, as opposed to the P&W variant where the exhaust pipe emerges from the cowling behind the engine. The aftermarket Eduard/Brassin Pegasus engine kit is very intricate and well executed. Compared to other resin kits I've built in the past, there is only a minimum of flash, and most of that is concentrated on the moulding "pins" rather than the parts. Crucially there are no air bubbles in any of the parts (an annoying side effect of working with resin that can only be fully avoided by the use of a vacuum chamber). There are multiple resin castings that make up the major components as well as some PE brackets for both the engine mounts and exhaust manifold. A quick side by side of the engine castings shows the major step up in detail: They really make the kit supplied parts almost toy-like in comparison. For what it's worth, the detail level in the kit parts is not a big deal after assembly as the kit engines would be largely hidden by the engine cowlings anyway, so there's no need to bash Airfix for any perceived shortcomings. One could happily assemble this entire kit out of the box and produce a perfectly acceptable model. I do have one criticism of the Eduard upgrade and that has to do with the propellor shaft. They're too short. A trial fit with the propellors shows that the shaft only protrudes as far as the propeller hub. There's not enough to allow for the mounting of the spinner (kind of important if you want the propellers to spin freely). I will probably cut them off and replace them with an appropriately sized, and adequate length of brass wire. In the long run, that might prove a bit more durable too. Painting and assemble has begun. Each engine differs slightly between left and right, it's probably a good idea to assemble one at a time, rather than building both and risking getting mixed up. In this case, I'm going to build the right engine first. I plan to display this engine with the cowling closed, so any "learning mistakes" will be hidden away (also there was a wobble in one of the cast on pushrods, so that will be hidden too). That spidery looking thing in the photo above is the intake manifold which mounts behind the cylinders. Next up is the PE brackets for the exhaust manifold. The instructions say to paint them black, but I will probably chemically blacken them instead. I think it will make for a nicer effect. Andy
  12. Hi BE, I don’t comment much, but you’re doing some amazing work with this little model! Nice solution to the deck problem, but I couldn’t help but notice one tiny detail. It looks like you’ve got the wood grain running fore and aft, while the planks are scribed athwart ships. Not sure if this was intentional for other reasons not apparent to me, or isn’t really that noticeable from normal viewing distance. Andy
  13. Thanks again, everyone, for the kind comments and "likes", and you're all especially welcome to share any experiences of the war, family, friend or personal. There's so much history that's gone undocumented, or poorly documented, and in the grand scheme of things, little time left to find out about it. For my next update, she has wings! We're flying' now! All of the elements went together quite well, a little patience and some green tape and there's hardly a seam to be seen. If the triangular patch for the waist window seems a bit more pronounced, it's due to a little Tamiya filler that was needed. The blank insert fit more like a window piece should, rather than right and tight. A small nuisance but Airfix could have done better, considering how well, for the most part, everything else has gone so far. On the rudder, the first little bits of external PE have also now been applied: Some tiny sticky-outy brass bits representing what I think are supposed to be balance weights. The original casting was a rather crude blob, and didn't compare nicely at all with the prototype. One slight modification, the Eduard instructions require the complete removal of the blob, but this leaves precious little gluing surface for the PE bits (literally the 0.050" thickness of the PE sheet). My approach was to trim down the cast on piece, leaving a little triangular tab on which to glue the PE replacement. I was also able to thin down the plastic to a little less than half the original thickness. This results in a much more secure attachment point for what is, after all, a very vulnerable detail. I should mention that as per the instructions, the landing gear should also be attached, but with all the additional PE and a load of painting yet to come, I've skipped over that step, and I'm likely to skip over a few more, (such as the turret installation and the bomb bay details in order to make things easier for painting. I worry that masking these fragile details might cause them harm as well as increase the risk of paint getting in places I don't want it to! Andy
  14. Both of my grandparents were teenagers living in occupied Holland during the war. Early one morning (sometime in ‘43, I think) an RAF pilot parachuted in to my grandmother’s backyard in Dieppenveen (just outside of Deventer). My great grandfather got in touch with the Dutch resistance to get him out. My great grandfather gave the pilot a change of clothes and afterwards escorted him on the train to meet up with another contact (look normal, don’t talk or make eye contact with anyone). Eventually the RAF pilot made it all the way through Holland, Belgium and France and finally made it to Spain to be repatriated. RAF policy at the time required that any returned pilots could not be sent over enemy territory in order to protect the people who helped them escape. Usually this meant “flying a desk”. The pilot in question didn’t particularly care for this and continued to bother his superiors to return to flying duties. Eventually they relented, some time in 1944, as the danger to the civilians was much reduced as the liberation of Europe was progressing. Sadly the RAF pilot was shot down again over the Friesian islands, this time fatally. My family didn’t find out about this until many years afterwards. I’ll see if I can find the name of the pilot online, but I found my great grandfather listed here: https://wwii-netherlands-escape-lines.com/helpers-of-allied-airmen/dutch-helper-list/dutch-helpers-by-selected-cities-and-towns/dutch-cities-chaam-to-fijnaart/deventer/ The second name on the list, Nicolaas Ankersmit. The name of the house should be Uiterwaard, (sounds kind of like “Aardvark”, but with a “d” instead of a “k”) not Viterwaard. Andy
  15. I just finished reading “Prisoners of the Castle” by Ben Macintyre. All about the POWs kept in Colditz. If you haven’t yet, I recommend it. Andy
  16. The red was a result of the dope used on the fabric skin. If you go back to the “Worker’s Weekend” video at the beginning of my log, there’s a mention of the dope colour. My camera (and lighting) makes it seem redder than it really is, it’s more of a duller oxide red colour. Andy
  17. You might get a kick out of poking around through here: https://www.bombercommandmuseumarchives.ca Although primarily focused on Canadian records and experiences, there’s a lot of interesting information available. Personal stories, daily ops reports etc. Andy
  18. Say goodbye to the interior! All the interior components have been installed and it's time to join the two fuselage halves! I did add one little extra scratch built detail, not included in the kit, let's see if anyone can spot it! I had a bit of a bit of a fitment issue; there's some cast wiring extending forward from the Second Pilot's Jump seat that interferes with the instrument panel. This didn't make it's presence known until I did a trial fit of the two halves and noticed the nose of the plane wouldn't close. A little bit of delicate surgery was needed to trim back the offending wires. It really won't be seen, especially after a little paint touch up: You can see the now severed cables in the centre of the above photo. I can't imagine that the Second Pilot's Seat was particularly comfortable, it doesn't even appear to have any kind of a back rest. Just a flip up metal stool with a seat belt! Anyway, after this issue was resolved, it was time to join up the fuselage: This is best done slowly, one section at a time to ensure things stay in their proper place. There is the inevitable warp in the parts to deal with, but nothing a little green tape and patience can't overcome! I don't recommend gluing in the wing spar until after the fuselage is set. The instructions would have you fix the spar in place before joining the two halves, but I found it easier to leave it "floating" to allow for a bit of flexibility. Now that things are joined, there's no more wiggle in the spar at all. I will have to do a little sanding, mostly because of a very slight difference in part thickness, and there are a couple spots that need a touch up of filler, mostly around the blanks for the waist windows. Andy
  19. Thanks everyone for the kind replies and "likes"! Rick, that's a fascinating document! Yes, the Mk II Wellingtons were identical to the Mk I, with the exception of the engines. Although I don't have parachute packs, it does explain the PE little storage racks that came in the detail set are the stowage spots for the 'chutes (there's one in the photo below above the cot, just forward of the bulkhead). A small update for today. I've been busy working on the other half of the fuselage, picking out all the frame details. All that remains is a little touch up of the base colours. In between detail painting sessions, I've been getting other components ready, things like the second pilot's jump seat, the flares and flare chute, and a couple more PE instruments. I have to make (fold) and paint a couple more parachute holders that sit in the nose of the aircraft, but otherwise, the interior is nearing completion. Andy
  20. Like what this guy has beneath his right hand? I think the sextant was stored under the chart table. My excuse is that I’m modelling the bomber on the ground, so the sextant should be stowed (the chart is out for planning a training/shakedown flight after some minor engine maintenance).😁 Andy
  21. I’ve finally just figured it out! Haha! The key hint I was missing, both of those fittings are located directly below the astro-dome. When the navigator needed to take a sight, those panels would be swung up and clipped together. They would help him steady himself while taking a sextant sight. Item #91 in this detailed drawing Incidentally, it also explains those box things located in the bomb bay. Apparently they’re an inflatable floatation system, to be used in the event of a water landing. I need to spend a couple of hours studying this drawing…. Andy
  22. So this has been a fun little diversion project... A chart, some parallel rulers and a little set of dividers. The ruler I made out of some thin clear styrene stock, I used some tiny pieces of stainless steel fret from one of the Eduard PE sets to simulate the links (these things are microscopically tiny). I did stick them on with a minute drop of canopy glue, but it still left a little smudge on the plastic, unfortunately. The dividers were made from a leftover lever, from the PE control console, folded over on itself. I gave the chart a quick shot of dulcote before I glued it in place on the chart table. The navigator is starting to look like he's actually doing his job, and not just staring out his perspex bubble! I also took a cue from that earlier interior photo to add an extra bit of detail: Just in the corner above the stretcher there is some sort of storage case. The PE set indicates there are supposed to be a couple located just inside the entryway (beside the bomb aimer), but curiously supplies a couple extras. One of them has now found a home. I wonder if I could manage those curtains too....🤔 Andy
  23. I misspoke in my above post, I meant to say I was going to use the chart on the left (since corrected). Now it seems I have an obligation to do so! 😁 Andy
  24. Thank you for your kind compliments! I have to give Airfix credit in the design of this kit, they've really done a great job. I think over the passage of time, when people think of the air war over Europe, the Wellington bomber has become overshadowed by its larger, more popular cousins, the Lancaster and the ubiquitous B-17. As I mentioned last evening, I found a good source of Hi-Res aeronautical charts, out of the extensive collection, I settled on two possible examples: Unfortunately, I am constrained by the resolution of my printer, but I think they will suit my purposes. I printed the charts from full resolution, scaled down to 5%. On the left is supposed to be the aeronautical chart of England North East dating from 1941 and on the right is a plotting chart covering Cork to Stettin dated July 1942. You can sort of vaguely make out the charts. I have room on the chart table for only one chart, so I may use the one on the *left*, as there is a bit of contrast and a more defined shape of "something". I may now have to make up some instruments for the navigator, a set of dividers and parallel rulers... Andy
  25. Here’s the interior photo again (from Wikipedia): There’s a wealth of details to take in, including the black lid on the…. Seat… (subsequently corrected on my model!). Andy
×
×
  • Create New...