Jump to content

AON

NRG Member
  • Posts

    2,585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AON

  1. My method of cutting out Frames in the 3D Hull (Images 4 thru 13)

     

    First turned off the keel by rolling up to hide it.

    I drew a single rectangle (taller than wide) to represent the SPACE between frames and located it to one side of dead flat. 

     

    Room and Space is 32-1/2” and the sided dimension of the floor timber is 16” so the space is ½”

    I made the rectangle ½” wide

    I then copied the rectangle using the Linear Pattern feature at 8" intervals

     

    I extrude cut through the hull in one step to reveal individual frames.

    Then to my amazement I noticed each frame was saved individually as Cut Extrude 1 thru 15.

    I could pick frames and hide them.

    So I hid all but the frame at dead flat.

    post-9868-0-37334100-1399021934_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-94314700-1399021942_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-53275100-1399021951_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-85195500-1399021960_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-03389400-1399021971_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-67523300-1399021982_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-86555300-1399021988_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-75631200-1399021997_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-28861300-1399022005_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-65055800-1399022013_thumb.jpg

  2. What I am about to describe was a test to figure out how to actually do what I am about to show.

    This is likely not the only way or possibly the best way but....

     

    My method of creating the Frame thickness (moulded dimension) layout at station  -0-  (dead flat) using Solidworks  (Images 1, 2 and 3)

     

    Steps:

     

    Offset the previously drawn outside frame line an arbitrary distance for reference.

    I used 1’-9” which is noted as the height of the Floor Timber above the keel.

    The build contract states 1’-11” but above that is penned in 1’-9” (as built notation).

     

    Locate the head of the Floor Timber = heel of the 2nd Futtock.

    The build contract states the Floor Timber is 23 feet at midships.

    Draw a reference line perpendicular between the existing outside frame line to the inside reference frame line.

    Lock the reference line in place with a “fix” mate.

    Insert a point on this perpendicular reference line and create a coincident mate between it and the reference line so it is locked to the reference line

    Locate the point at a distance of 13.5 inches from the outside of the frame using a dimension.

    The 13.5” represents the moulded dimension of the frame at the head of the Floor Timber.

    The addition of the dimension locks it in place.

     

    Repeat these steps for each moulded dimension called out on the build contract

    Head of Lower (1st) Futtock at 7’. Moulded dimension 12.75”

    Head of 2nd Futtock at 7’. Moulded dimension 12.25”

    Head of 3rd Futtock at 7’. Moulded dimension 11-5/6” (11.83”)

    Head of 4th Futtock at 11’-6”. Moulded dimension 10.5”

    Top Timber moulded dimension 5.5”

     

    Insert a point to represent the Top of the Floor Timber above the Keel at 1’-9”

    Lock it in position with a coincident mate on the centre line and a dimension for the height

     

    Draw a Polyline representing the inside frame line connecting all points from the Top of the Floor to the Top Timber.

    This line looked perfect except for the area between the heads of the 3rd and 4th futtock so I introduced an intermediate point at half distances to correct the look of it.

    I inserted a point on the polyline and then moved it to the intermediate point to correct the look of the polyline in this area.

     

    The contract also states that the framing moulded depth dimension at gun ports 12” versus 11.83” or 10.5”.  At a scale build this is miniscule (about 0.03" at ¼ scale and 0.02” at 1/6 scale) and hardly controllable after any sanding so I’ve decided to not get too excited about it for now.

     


    I then drew lines to join the outside/inside at the Top Timber and also traced in the frame joint at the keel.

    Mirrored the sketch to produced the opposite side and extruded the whole thing from mid-plane to get the 3D hull frame thickness

     

    post-9868-0-25350600-1399021723_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-90422100-1399021733_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-98566400-1399021741_thumb.jpg

  3. My NRG mentor suggests I need to get off the fence and pick a model scale!

    Okay, he didn’t exactly say that (he is much nicer than that) but essentially that is what needs to be done.

     

    Well I have come to admit my reluctance to picking a scale…. I have trouble seeing the finish size in my head.  You see in my line of work I envision the task in full detail (all the wee bits and pieces going together are revealed in full glory in my mind’s eye) and only then can I draw it. To do this I work in sub-assemblies.  So how do I see the completely assembled magnificence of a Man Of War in my mind.  Photos just don’t seem to be enough so I calculated the overall length stern to bowsprit, keel to tip of the main top gallant and width not being the full breadth of the hull but the length of the main yard. Then I picked the scales that I would consider working in and compared it all with tape measures on the floor and an old fashioned yard stick in hand.

     

    My rough estimated calculations yielded something very near 222 feet (67.7m) long x 215 feet (65.5m) tall x 99 feet (30.2m) wide at full size.

     

    At    1 : 48  (1/4” = 1 ft)   = approx. 55” (140 cm Long x 54” (137 cm) tall x 25” (64 cm) wide

    At    1 : 64  (3/16” = 1 ft) = approx. 42” (107 cm) Long x 40” (102 cm) tall x 19” (48 cm) wide.

    At    1 : 72  (1/6” = 1 ft)   = approx. 37” (94 cm) Long x 36” (91 cm) tall x 17” (43 cm) wide

    At    1 : 96  (1/8” = 1 ft)   = approx.  28” (71 cm) Long x 27” (69 cm) tall x 13” (33 cm) wide

     

     In my mind smaller is going to be tougher to build but possibly more forgiving whereas larger might be easier to build but more revealing (warts and all).  A 14” sided frame will be very near ¼” to 1/8” at the various scales.  Tiny frames may be something to worry about…. Particularly as they only get smaller as you build upwards to the timber line where they are 1/8” to 1/16” sided dimension.

     

    Where to display my model years from now must be decided and has been my number one nagging thought since the moment I decided to move forward with this whole endeavour. 

     

    The fireplace mantle is narrow; the foyer cabinet under my grand-dad’s picture in his RNNR sailor uniform is far too small; the cabinet in the den might be nice but I am just now thinking down in the dungeon area (basement) where I will be building the model might be the best location as inspiration for all other builds that might follow.

     

    If this is the case 1:48 scale is definitely on the table for consideration.

     

    I would very much like to hear from forum members about concerns with scale before I chisel it in stone.

     

    Comments?

     

    Presently I am creating the 3D image of my hull at dead flat and going to trim out a few frames just so I get a feel for it.

    Having tried revealed my hull is not so fair as I had hoped and so I will be back onto that.

    When is fair fair enough I wonder?

    Once again we are back to the issue of scale.

     

    I will be posting my Hull 3D images and steps to get it done hopefully by this weekend.
  4. Here are four snap shots of the model I created for my movable, pivot top, walk around modelling table.

    *** If anyone see something amiss please let me know ***

     

    This table will adjust a full 15.7" (40 cm) in height from 29" to 44.7" (74 cm to 114 cm)

    The website says the lift cylinders require a minimum load of 35 lbs (15.8 kg) on each cylinder to operate and will lift 750 lbs (340 kg) total weight

     

    The darker looking table top area is stationary measuring 24" x 36" (61 cm x 91 cm)

    The lighter looking table top area presently pivoted measuring 24" x 48" (61 cm x 122 cm)

    The pivoting top will adjust in 5° increments from 0° (flat and level with the fixed top) to 60°

    It will pivot from either the front or the back (both ways, only one shown)

    I envision four simple sliding bolt pivot pins (not drawn up yet) to make this work.

     

    I intend to mount a sacrificial finished 3/4" (19 mm) plywood top on top of a 3/4" (19 mm) sub-base (total top thickness 1-1/2" = 38 mm)

    This means I can replace the finished top at any time via a few screws or bolts if every I need to.

     

    The four rectangular cut outs at the ends of the table frame are for electrical outlet boxes

     

    The underside view shows the pump/motor unit, controller box and button station

    Not shown is the wiring and flexible tubing that would connect everything

    The lift cylinders are mounted inside the four legs

    I've left the foot pads on as the supplier (SUSPA.com) did not have caster models or dimensions on their website

    Once I receive the items I can get the size of the caster and adjust my leg lengths if necessary

     

    No cabinet of drawers.

    I'll have to pick up a small rolling drawer cabinet later.

    I'll mount my florescent light fixture overhead off the floor joists (I'll be in my basement)

     

    I hope to receive the lift kit next week and start my table build in a couple weeks

    Will post photos then!

     

    Alan

     

    post-9868-0-33606300-1398520596_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-29539800-1398520604_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-38419300-1398520610_thumb.jpg

    post-9868-0-63641700-1398520618_thumb.jpg

  5. It took some doing but I've cleaned it all up considerably and yesterday purchased a motorized hydraulic table lift kit from SUSPA out of Grand Rapids Michigan (the local distributor in Toronto had me deal directly with the supplier via e-mail).  I also purchased two locking and two non-locking casters from them.

     

    I'll be cleaning up my 3D model over the weekend and will post the results,

     

    Once I start building I will post some photos.

     

    Thanks again for the input and I apologize if I offended anyone with the way I originally felt about the cost of the electric lifts.  Although they are not cheap they are clean and functional.  It took a while for me to see the light.  It can be tough to admit you might be wrong.  (see what I did there?)

     

    BTW ... my table will have a  pivoting section.

     

    Alan

  6. Good morning all.

     

    I took the weekend to mull it all over in my mind

    Being honest with myself, my mechanical designer side loves the direction I am going.

    My practical side is telling me the "cabinet" is too bulky and lets face it ... ugly.

    My darling wife was very nice about it all but when I discussed it with her she quietly agreed with everything I said.

    I suppose she does know me very well after all, eh?

     

    I like what Mike suggests and Gaetan did... practical, mobile and space saving.

    Jud and Augie are correct, a table can be pulled away from the wall and walked around.  If it is not too deep (as opposed to long) it wouldn't be an issue to reach across... so I could forget the turn table idea also.

     

    I cannot let go of the pivot idea as being practical and useful.

     

    I have all the wood and wood glue to make a table top and frame so there is no expense for anything but the fasteners, electrical outlets, wire, ground plugs and florescent bulbs for the fixture over head.

     

    It is back to the drawing board for something simple and practical.... and yes I have an idea!

     

    I did find another source for a clean add on lift device (  http://www.suspa.com/us/products/table-lift-systems/movotec-industrial-systems/ ) with a distributor in Toronto (1-1/2 hours driving from me - one way) and have e-mailed them for pricing of the bolt on and corner leg power lift systems.

     

    I am hoping they are reasonable.

  7. So here is the last half of my first "kick at the cat" (if you are a cat lover it is just a saying... I'd never actually kick a cat, :o they've been known to attack)

     

    1. cabinet with doors closed (getting late so I haven't bothered with the OSHA ;) rated outside enclosure of the counter weight)

     

    2. doors open ( I can envision a roll out cabinet of storage drawers)

       You can see the table inside

       Fluorescent lights to be mounted inside on the roof towards the front (I have three or four 48" double bulb assemblies in storage ... do you think one of these might be too much illumination?

       Electrical outlets (not shown) to be on the front of the moving table, one double outlet on each side in the short apron under the table top

      Back wall might have a long metal strip mounted on it so I can hang drawings with magnets ... might do the same on the inside of the doors

     

    3. rear view of cabinet

       The counter weight is outside (pink),  one on each side to get adequate sand weight

       A cross bar on the bottom that ties them together (cable would go through the sand and secure to the bar

       Silicone can seal the cable hole

       Some guides on each side of the counterweight

       I put the counterweights on the side because if it was behind it pushed the cabinet out further, and it is out far enough right now.

     

    4. side view showing cable run

       Although an engineering friend advised I need the cable run across the top from side to side... it just doesn't seem right to me.  I think it should dead end at the top front cross pulley location and not run across from side to side.  This would mean there are two individual cables, one on each side.  I will need to experiment and see for myself.

     

    I just noticed a misteak ... the counterweight should be raised when the table is down!  DOH!

     

    5. Iso view of cabinet and table assembly with doors and back wall removed

       In this assembly the table lifts from 23.25 inches to 40 inches above the floor

       I see it locking / adjusting in about 4 inch increments or so

     

    Now I walk away from it for a while and chew on it for a bit.

    I'm sure to try to simplify it some.

     

    My darling wife thought I was just going to build a simple shelf type table off the wall... I thought she knew me better than that after 39 years of marriage   :rolleyes:

    post-9868-0-39571800-1397862379_thumb.png

    post-9868-0-33985100-1397862392_thumb.png

    post-9868-0-46877600-1397862404_thumb.png

    post-9868-0-99525000-1397862415_thumb.png

    post-9868-0-73694100-1397862425_thumb.png

  8. My budget estimate for now

     

    Garage Door Pulley (Canadian Tire) $5.99 ea x 10 = $60 approx.

    100 feet Steel wire rope (Canadian Tire) = $28.99 reg

    sub total $90

    Say $125 with all hardware (clips, bolts, etc) and taxes and I have a mechanical lift (less the counter weight container ... beach sand is free)

     

    Knife Hinge 3/4 x 1-3/4 x 1/8 (Lee Valley) $33.30 a pair

    Aluminium 9" Lazy Susan (Lee Valley) $23.90

    sub total $57.20

    Say $66 with taxes and I have a combination rotating/swiveling model top

     

    Now I need to complete a drawing to get lumber and hardware cost for the desk and cabinet enclosure

    I'm going to guess a couple hundred bucks

    So for about $400 and some effort I might have a closing cabinet modelling work station

     

    I will keep you posted

  9. Thank you Don!

     

    Since I could not find the "staples easy button" for this in my SW reference book I was getting the impression I was going to have to redraw the inside of each station, re-loft and re-fair.... as I am not sure an offset matches the contract dimensions.

     

    Not something I look forward to but, as they say on the French side of my home town, c'est la vie!

     

    (But I'll wait to see if anyone else has a trick to share first)

  10. So I've drawn my stations, utilized the solidworks thin lofting feature to create the shell of the hull, completed fairing the shell.

     

    http://modelshipworld.com/index.php?/topic/5534-hms-bellerophon-by-aon-%E2%80%93-scale-tbd-%E2%80%93-1786-74-gun-3rd-rate-man-of-war-arrogant-class/

     

    Now I want to add a varied thickness to the loft feature to simulate the frame moulded dimensions

     

    At midships these dimensions are:

    21" cut down line (height of the floor timber over the keel)

    12-3/4" at the heel of the 1st futtock/head of the cross chock

    12-1/4" at the heel of the 2nd futtock/ head of the floor timber

    11-5/6" at the head of the 1st futtock / heel of the 3rd futtock

    11-1/2" at the gun deck elevation

    12" at the gun port

    11-1/2" at the upper deck elevation

    5-1/2" at the timber line

     

     

    How do I add a varied thickness?

     

    Alan

  11. It is an extremely nice set up you have created but please tell me you didn't pay $1000+ for the base!

     

    I am going to get some pricing for pulleys, cable, swing hinges for the pivot top and a lazy susan type bearing pad for the rotating top.

    My gut tells me this will save me  bags of money plus there is always the unmatched satisfaction of having built it from scratch.

     

    I have started a 3D model of the table tops and realize the rotating top needs to be raised to clear the fixed horizontal top when the pivot top is utilized.

     

    Will hopefully post something after the weekend.

    post-9868-0-55514500-1397726161_thumb.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...