-
Posts
491 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by mrcc
-
The next day, I masked off the deck and hull and spray primed and painted the stanchions and waterway. I must say much quicker and easier than painting by brush. The only problem is in a few spots where the Tamiya masking tape was not pressed down firmly enough, I had some creeping of the paint underneath. I have since scraped off some with a razor blade and sanding, but there still is a blemish on the wood. It is a tough and tight corner to completely erase the blemish. Any suggestions how to completely rid the paint blemish?
-
This is work from a few weeks back... I drilled the holes in the cap railing in order to accept the chainplate and then with the dowel to simulate the mast, sighted where the shrouds would end (on the dowel) and marked the slight angulations via the marks shown onto the hull. From below I sighted to the hole on the cap rail and cut out the notches to later accept the chainplate.
-
Jeez, hope you didn't send your "message" via email. You will likely not get a reply!
-
I sent an email in August. I sent an email in September... No reply and still no parts on my doorstep.
-
I know finishing carpenters just prior to painting or staining use it on the wood. You should be able to get it at any hardware store, in North America anyways. A slightly damp cloth may work OK as well.
- 127 replies
-
- Bluenose
- Billing Boats
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Looks good! Once completely sanded, I would buy some tack cloth, and this will allow you to wipe down the deck and pick up all the fine sawdust, and you are ready to varnish/seal. Julian
- 127 replies
-
- Bluenose
- Billing Boats
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks Jan-Willem, The paint is Tamiya's Flat Red. I agree it is a bit bright but nonetheless I am still happy with the color. Perhaps it could have had a bit more of a copper tinge to it. Tamiya's paint line is a bit sparse on color variations unless my hobby store did not carry their full line. Cheers, Julian
-
This is funny... some people have luck with getting replacement parts and some don't as myself. Equally funny is that when you check build logs of members, there is always people stalled waiting for parts that were originally missing. PS I wouldn't worry about registering as I guarantee you, you will not get a response. That I am sure of.
-
Thanks Keith, With regards to the waterline, yes, that is how I did it on a previous build of mine. The issue here is that I was missing a building cradle until just recently. The new one shipped to me is out of scale (too small) but I am going to open it up and stabilize it with some build outs (with wood). Julian
-
I also had some replacements parts shipping out from Billing Boats here in Canada. Very good and quick service... The parts pictured is from the present Bluenose model that Billing sells and it is at the 1:65 scale, not the 1:75 scale of my present (old) kit. I obtained a photocopy of the missing sheet at 1:1 scale from the old kit marketed by Billing... (thanks again 7Provinces) and noticed that the parts are identical in scale in comparison. I think the old kit marketed at 1:75 was "way off". The only parts that don't work on the model, and present scale, (that was shipped to me) is the building cradle. Not sure how Billing got the scale off by so much. I think the scale of my kit is likely closer to 1:60 or even larger.
-
So I painted a rough swath of white on each side of the waterline and then I taped off with a 1/8 inch tape (not Tamiya as I couldn't find this size which I think may yet be a tad too thick for the present scale). I then painted a first light coat to seal the tape edge on each side and then 4 more coats (total of 5) which is the present state. I used Tamiya paint which I found a bit thin compared to Admiral paints which is a bit thick in my opinion. Looks like I need another coat or two of the red...? I also think the Tamiya tape is probably better.
-
Started some painting. The waterline was a bit difficult to get. My technique was to measure off the plans down from the top rail at the bow, mid way at two points and again at the stern, on both sides, and then took a pencil on a glass to scribe a rough line connecting all the points while the ship was upside down.
-
I agree Joe... I am usually quite easy going but I think I am at a bit of a boiling point on this matter. But I sense that since venting on this thread that my temperature is already falling. Hooray for me!
-
PS. That was what Mr Wright told me when I waited for my deck sheet to arrive (5 weeks). The first sheet must have gotten lost or held up at customs. He will send another, which fortunately for me arrived 3 weeks later.
-
So as a second point, I inherited a 30 year old Billing Boats kit, specifically the Bluenose, a kit that is no longer available and discontinued in the current scale. My neighbour, who passed the kit to me, many years ago lost a small sheet of the kit. Last week I sent a blind email to the Billing Boats distributor, PM Hansen, based out of Vancouver, British Columbia, and within 1 hour I had a reply, and 3 days later, the parts arrived in the mail. Remember this is a 30 year old kit, now discontinued, and I was still able to get parts replaced in "days". Now that is customer service! Sorry no excuses should be made for Jotika and Caldercraft. I sense that people are too forgiving of Jotika and their current level of deplorable "customer service". If Mr Wright is so busy that he can not return emails or get that sheet off to Australia, then he needs to hire some extra help, someone with the skills to assemble "all" the sheets and parts to complete a kit.
-
All's well, that ends well sometimes doesn't work for me. I noticed on lots of the logs involving Caldercraft builds, there is stages in which people are getting supplies and parts shipped out to them that were originally not supplied. Maybe if Jotika put more care in their packaging, they could drop the price on their kits. Instead we are paying the price in their original markup to ship , reship, and ship again, parts that are missing. They need to perhaps hire extra help and focus on the simple details. I am in business as well, if I had the same error and omission rates, I would be out of business. PS still waiting for an email reply. My first email was sent in early August to Jotika. I know it was read as I got the read receipt. I can't figure this out. Either too busy or too busy to care. Either way absolutely terrible customer service.
-
Nothing but problems for me as well trying to get hold of Jotika. I purchased my Granado kit in November 2012 and started the build and noticed into the build that an entire sheet was missing, specifically the sheet with the deck. Tried to get ahold of Jotika without luck and finally asked the retailer to work on my behalf which finally worked. Few months later, on an inventory, noticed that other pieces were missing, specifically unique plank and wood lengths, and again no luck with Jotika. The retailer in this situation just mailed out the wood lengths directly from their shop. I now noticed that I am missing some small white cast pieces. Didn't know that I should take an inventory and that I should never presume a kit has all it's pieces complete and supplied as expected. Personally I would expect better from a kit manufacturer, especially given the expense of these kits. My take is Jotika doesn't care. The guy putting together my kit must have been hungover or high. I have sent numerous emails to Jotika without a response. I have recently sent 3 emails to John Wright and various other email addresses without a single response. Very disappointed!
-
I am interested in seeing how they turn out...
- 127 replies
-
- Bluenose
- Billing Boats
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi Jan-Willem, I agree with David in that it may detract from the beautiful deck you already have and I am not sure what the tree nailing would look like on such a dark wood. Certainly the choice is always yours. Julian
- 127 replies
-
- Bluenose
- Billing Boats
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.