Jump to content

ScottRC

Members
  • Posts

    559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ScottRC

  1. The smaller ones had be heated next to an iron and formed to shape.  I tend to now, as Jud said, use them as patterns and make them out of wooden dowels.

     

    The larger ones should be two-piece assemblies.  With these, you can put a small steel, or wooden rod in them and glue the halves together.  Makes sure to use a lot of clothes pins to clamp them down with.

  2. Hi there, Popeye.  There are 2 wooden dowels (one on each side) that extend through all but the aft most bulkhead.  It appears that they serve as both additional reinforcement as also for aid in maintaining alignment.

    The holes would be practical in keeping the frames aligned.  Using steel rods would be better since there is less warp.  The process is like how a model airplane wing is laid up using a jig. 

  3. If there is ever a kit I wish would still be in production, it was this one.  I look forward to following your build.  I have built two Aeropiccola kits (Mayflower and Endeavor) and unless you are good with Italian and draw mentally in your mind what the plans are actually describing, they are a challenge, however they turn out to be really nice models.

     

    Scott

  4. Great to hear your feeling better and that you got some more kits in your stocking from your husband. My wife got me a 1/96 Constitution when we were first married.

     

    Keep at it on the rigging, it is looking fine.  These kits are great to allow you to take small steps at developing skills with both the standing and running rig of the ship.  Trust us, what you are learning on the Columbus ships will make building the large Constitution much more enjoyable.

     

    I found it easy for me to make photo copies of the rig plan, enlarge it, then use a colored highlighter to trace the thread that I needed to follow.  I got this technique from watching the electrical engineers I work with trace wiring diagrams and it worked well.

     

     

    Scott

  5. Vivian,

     

    I seem to always end up with one opening, usually cabin windows, too high or too low.  It is better to have the cannon low so that all you need to do is shim it up. 

     

    In regards to canon use, it really all depends on what the ship was contracted to do.  Ships of the period we are discussing were "multi-purpose" so at least they would have one cannon to use for signalling, or could have in board a dozen or more if contracted for military expedition.  As was explained earlier, cannon of this period were still regarded to be used for artillary support for soldiers.  This is why this period is so interesting. Like the combat evolution of the airplane, which started out just to be an observation platform to support the infantry, the ship was used primarily to carry, aid, and support the infantry, and not to be used as a primary offensive weapon, yet we see within a period of 200 years ships evolving into single-purpose fighting vessels.

     

    Scott

  6. At one of my previous places of work, I used print binders and had a binder extension on my drafting table.  Before the computer, used to do a lot of size D prints with overlays on one table.  About a year ago, I picked up a large drafting table and some binders from a company that was throwing them out.  Please ignore the airplane, this is the only current pic I have of the table.  Under the plane is a print clamp and scale.  The table is great because it is adjustable and I can also attach my drafting machine and scales to it to lift measurements off the print.  The binder allows me to stack multiple prints and keep them in order.

     

    post-3680-0-04105800-1384977647_thumb.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...