NavyShooter

Welcome aboard!

Plugging away...some decent progress. Realized that I've not printed all of the bits - there are a lot of the ventilation mushrooms to be made! I painted some sections of the decks in brown to represent the wooden portion of the decks. My never ending problem with bubbling paint seems to have returned as well. I'm going to end up with some extra work due to that. I expect I'll have her done in the next few weeks.

That's coming along beautifully! Well done!

She's come a fair ways in the past couple of weeks. Even with me being out of area for a long weekend. You can see the camo pattern I've adopted. Black hull, white sides, light blue 'swoop' and dark blue stern. Decks will be a standard dark gray, and in doing a bit more research, I've determined that there were portions of the uppers that were actually covered in wood, so I'll be digging up some grown paint and adding that in too.

Here are the photos I've managed to collect of HMCS St Thomas. From what I can tell, there are 3 different camouflages that may have been applied to her. Looking at Pic 1, you can see a light hull background, with a darker swell or wave coming up. Pictures 2 and 3 show the light hull with a darker slash and very dark stern. This is repeated in Picture 4 and 6. Picture 5 shows a simulation of a smaller hull in a darker colour against a light background hull. My intent is to 'match the swoop' as seen in pictures 2 and 3, with a darker stern area. My interpretation of these photos is that it's a white hull, with a blue 'swoop', and a darker blue or dark gray stern. I've carefully selected paints (the best that Tremclad sells!) that I'm going to use to do the painting. First layer will be the white base layer. Then I'll add a light blue swoop with the slash that goes across the superstructure, then a darker gray stern. Sackville is white with a very light blue. That's the source of my inspiration. Anyone have any better images or colour recommendations? NS

The progress this weekend was....a second coat. After waiting over 48 hours with a small heater/fan pointed at the hull to dry things out faster. Tomorrow, I'll be putting her into her cradle and marking a waterline, then it's off to the 'above the waterline' work. I did a screen capture of a video from a gent who built one, and he's got her with a red hull (incorrect) a black boot top (irrelevant with a black hull bottom) and a dark gray upper hull, with some black camo lines on her. I'm leaning towards a white camo style, with dark blue lines. I suspect we're working from similar ship photos, but his interpretation of the colour might be off because it's black and white. I'm not going to say he's wrong...but based on my proximity to HMCS Sackville, I'm going to guess that other Corvettes were painted up in similar colours to her. NS

Have a look at the "Night Shift" channel on Youtube. ( @nightShiftScaleModels) He built a diorama of a MkIV in a trench/crater that shows some really good detail and weathering techniques.

There was mention early in this thread of there being a 'second ship' - the second Liberty Ship that I printed at the same time as I did mine - that being for my buddy the model railroader. Well, last month, he brought the hull over and I helped him learn about gelcoat and fiberglass. He stayed for the first layer - I did the next few on my own, and last night I called him over to help shoot the first layer of primer. There's a couple of minor spots that I've sanded again and added a bit of red body putty to those. A bit more sanding and another layer of primer, and she'll be good to go. He's going to bring her home to finish up the rest of the build. NS

A friend of mine pointed out that these ships in RCN service actually had BLACK painted hulls below the waterline. So. With a pause enforced by being out of province for a bit for work, I'm now back to the bench and decided to shoot a layer of black gloss on the bottom of the keel. More to follow...and this time I'm going to be PATIENT and WAIT the 48 hours before recoating. I promise.

Maybe I screwed up, but maybe not. From what I can see, there's 20mm Oerlikons that feed from both left and right.

OK, Having sailed in the Navy for a lot of years, I'll observe a couple of things - Firstly - everything has a place, and it should be in place. Secondly, on a Navy Ship, most of those 'places' were designed to properly hold those things, and keep them in place. A big factor in objects on a ship is inertia - but I'm certain you all know that. A cannon, on wheels, even when secured in place will still have some range of motion - the flex or stretch in the lines will enable this. The weight of a cannon and its carriage is huge - the 3 pdr I have in my garage takes an engine hoist to move safely into and out of the bed of my truck. Cannon balls are round, but they are not on wheels, nor are they loose rolling about on the deck. In looking at pictures online of HMS Victory and other ships, there are cannon ball holders either behind the guns on the deck, or on the bulkhead beside the guns. Those holders see at least 1/3 of the ball sitting into the wood, with only maybe 2/3 of the ball exposed. The deck ones, in heavy seas, would not require a lot of effort to toss a blanket on top of them to ensure they wouldn't roll anywhere. The bulkhead ones? I suspect that if you looked closely at them, you'd find wear spots where they'd have a cover tied on to help keep them in place. Before a ship was to sail in the modern Navy, we'd always do "secure for sea" rounds on the day before sailing. Are things tied down, are they secure, did they use rope instead of a bungee cord (NEVER use bungee cord!) I suspect that the same applied for the age of sail. When a ship is alongside and open for tours, you don't see the chains holding the helicopter in place in the hangar. They're all disconnected and hung up along the bulkhead, and are practically invisible to a visitor. They're looking at the fancy helicopter, not the chains and clips and such. If you asked a visitor to a ship how a helicopter was secured, they'd probably not have a clue. You'd need to be a member of the Air Det to know which chains go where, which tie down points to use, which shackle point on the helo is appropriate for use and so on.

Some slow progress - I spent the weekend working on a hull for another friend of mine. He's a model railroader, so ships are not his thing. He brought beer over and we puttered away in the garage building a rudder, and getting a layer of gelcoat over his hull. I did assemble the Orelikon guns and the searchlight platform though. Starting to come together. NS

I love my Chargemaster! Great work, and I look forward to your continued updates!

Very nice design. I wish to see more details of your reloading bench though...I have a modular design for mine, with a metal bench, and a wooden work surface (no sparky!) and I have my presses setup on 3/4" ply bases that have a standard bolt pattern so I can swap my Dillon 550 and my RCBS out whenever I need to go from speed of production to precision of production. 🙂 I know you've mentioned HVAC, but I'll highly suggest adding a spot for a dehumidifier as well. Humidity is a killer - both for wooden models (if that's your preference) but also for powders. When building your powder storage box, I recommend a fully wood construction, with brass fittings (again, no sparky!) (Said by the guy who used to instruct the reloading course at the local club) NS

In looking at the hole designated #18, there seems to be a bar slid into it - so there would be a long pole sticking out behind the carriage that would enable them to push left or right a bit to help aim the cannon?

In case anyone is interested, here is the 81 page instruction manual that is included with the download files. So far, I've been assembling things without looking at it...I am now at the point where I probably *should* read the instructions. uploads_files_2715711_3D_Printed_1.48_Scale_Castle_Class_Corvette_Instructions.pdf

Bofors!

A bit more progress over the weekend. If I can get back out to the garage this afternoon, I'll assemble some of the AA Weapons systems.

And finally, we have a layer of primer on the hull. A bit of sanding and tidying still ahead.

And, you can see from the previous photo, and this one, that I've started on the ballasting. Some lead shot, some additional strength from some fiberglass sheeting and a bit of resin to hold it all together. Intent is to add more weight in the form of additional metal bars (I'm almost out of lead shot!) and hold them in place with resin as well.

So, after an appropriate length of time for the epoxy paint to dry, I had a go with the sander and got it almost all off. Good. Let's try this again.

OK....so....I knew that the drying time on the epoxy paint was 7 days between coats...I read that very clearly on the instructions. I chose NOT to wait 7 days. I am an idiot.

I really like the black and white image of the impact zone on your display. That's a neat touch. I came across a website that had some of the original B&W overlaid with modern Google-maps satellite imagery, showing the areas where the craters were in modern times. That was a really neat overlay. Well done on the models as well, they're spectactular!

5th layer of gelcoat applied - the hull is now quite smooth. I think a light sanding and some primer will be the next step tomorrow!

Rumble I heard was that they were painting the hull, and so my thought is that maybe they had some of the shoring had been removed to paint a section, then they put it back in place incorrectly? The Shores are supposed to be lined up correctly with the hull frames to give the right support. If they'd removed some shores, and put them back slightly offset from the actual frame, then it would be pressing on the hull plate rather than the frame, which has some give to it, and in high winds (25 knot winds were forecast that day?), could have compressed/loosened the shores, and if one or two fell due to improper placement, then it would likely lead to a domino effect.