-
Posts
874 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Der Alte Rentner
-
USS Constitution by mtbediz - 1:76
Der Alte Rentner replied to mtbediz's topic in - Build logs for subjects built 1751 - 1800
I made mine parallel to supports two and three. I've looked at a million photos, and while there is an argument to be made for a slight angle forward, I thought parallel was the better bet. In part, my thinking was that it should be parallel to joint of the two grates it supports. For that reason, support five would be angled forward. -
USS Constitution by mtbediz - 1:76
Der Alte Rentner replied to mtbediz's topic in - Build logs for subjects built 1751 - 1800
Man! You make it look so easy.. I just spent another 4 plus hours on mine, and the supports don't look anywhere as nice as yours. Great work! -
Back to the fiddly bits. Man, oh man, is this time consuming stuff. Also it's amazing what you see in photographs that you don't see when you're working on the parts themselves. I'm going to have to do some tweaking on the little slots for the third rail. There seems to be some disparity in the height of the slot on support 3 on the port side compared to that of the starboard side. Oh well, having fun.. The grating has not yet been glued in. I was waiting for the base support to be fairly solid first.
-
USS Constitution by mtbediz - 1:76
Der Alte Rentner replied to mtbediz's topic in - Build logs for subjects built 1751 - 1800
Inspiring workmanship, as always.. -
Okay, I think I'm committed now. Or maybe I should be.. 😁 The supports will come before the rails. Everything right now is just tacked in with the smallest dots of super glue. Before I make anything permanent, I've got to shape, stain, and carve out the grooves for the rails. I think once I get the grates attached to the supports and the cross beams, the entire structure shoukd be solid enough that I can tweak those grooves a bit as needed when I get to the rails. P.S. to those who suggested that the cat heads would hold up to jostling once glued in, I beg to differ..
-
USS Constitution by mtbediz - 1:76
Der Alte Rentner replied to mtbediz's topic in - Build logs for subjects built 1751 - 1800
You may indeed be right. One think I would check now though, is how does the grating for the head fit? When I fitted the rails I had bent to shape, I found that the grating didn't fit at all. So, I think I'll bend the rails to fit later. With the plank bending iron I have, that should be easier than trying to get the grating etc. to fit the curves later. and it goes without saying, excellent work as always!! -
I found another hour or two of Shipyard time today. (Trying to keep up with Mustafa..) The experimentation continues. Nothing is glued together permanently yet, except for the head and two portions of the grating. What I have discovered through this process is that the plans for the supports seem to be off as well. I had to shave quite a bit of material off the top of posts four and three. If I continue with this methodology, I will copy those shapes to boxwood before gluing anything permanently on the starboard side. This way I can come close to the right shapes as a starting point for the port side. One difficulty for me will be that I've got to stain the supports before I glue them into place. So I'll have to be darned sure I'm happy with the configuration first.
-
USS Constitution by mtbediz - 1:76
Der Alte Rentner replied to mtbediz's topic in - Build logs for subjects built 1751 - 1800
It would seem that you and I are taking different approaches. I'm coming at it from the support-first methodology. I'm keeping my options open though, and will watch closely from the sidelines to see how your plan shapes up. So far, I haven't glued anything into place, while I experiment. Good luck. P.S. Man! that copper plating looks good. -
Okay, I did manage to sneak away for an hour. Here is the result of my latest round of head scratching.. I can't imagine that the "poop deck" 😁 would have been severely angled, so I'm assuming a more horizontal aspect, at least for the first two sections of the grating. Shall I work the supports around the only solidly accurate portion of the plan? The grating? Jon, in your enormous library of photographs, do you have any that show the comfort station from let's say the bowsprit toward the head access in the hull? I want to know if the grating is more or less parallel to the water line. Or if everything is tilted slightly upward from the hull toward the bowsprit. This is all I could find on the subject.. This is where I'm at.
-
I picked up the spelling (bumpkins) from the plans that came with the MS plans for Conny. Even in the photos you supplied above, there doesn't appear to be any necessary rigging associated with them, so, I remain on the "I'll pass" side of the argument. I'll leave it to you and Unegawahya to settle this hash.. By the way, I wonder if it's going to take me as long to memorize the spelling of Unegawahya's name as it will to finish this model.. 🤔
-
Here I thought the galleries were the most difficult part of this build to date. I've been back and forth between the shipyard and my PC to try to formulate a plan. I really would like to install the timbers/supports first so that shaping the rails is easier. I'm still going over build logs. I think the fifth support, the stern-most one (Hunt numbered them 1 to 5 from the stem), is angled slightly to the stern. My goal will be to try for even spacing along the upper ends where they meet rail 2. I did fabricate a rail 2, out of 1/8" square stock, and using my trusty plank bending iron, managed that compound bend. Unfortunately, it appears to sit too far inboard and doesn't leave enough room for the grating. Back to the drawing board to see what's what. It'll have to wait until Monday though, as family obligations will occupy most of the rest of today and tomorrow. Six years? 🤔 The more I look at the photos of your build, the more convinced I am that you nailed it in terms of the supports. And this one helps me tremendously to visualize where the grating placement needs to be. On the bumpkins: I just checked page 7 of the plans, which shows the bulk of the rigging. I see the bumpkins, but don't think anything is rigged to them. That it didn't occur to me to look for them in the actual photos of the Constitution, is a clear sign I need to worry about early onset Alzheimer's. 😁 And for what it's worth, I have a blowup of this view pinned up near my work bench a reference. That's where I got the notion the spacing should be even between the supports. I wish Conny wasn't painted black. It would be so much easier to pick out details in photographs. Oh well. Thanks again, Unegawahya
-
Turns out I have to agree with Hunt. The plans are wrong. Using the top view as my reference, I found where the timbers need to align with the grates. Those Timbers need to be forward of where the plan suggests they are in the broadside view. I'll figure out where Timber five goes later. Got to go see an eye doctor, so this is all I've got for today..
-
I noticed that the 5th support didn't appear until after the rails were in place. Also that 4th one was affixed to the stem, not in the corner, which seems to be the consensus view but contradictory to the plans, where 4 would be on the stem but touch the bow. I've been trying to keep the spacing at the tops of those supports relatively even, hence my attempt to angle #4 at the bow. I'll get continue to experiment with placement to find a solution that satisfies my aesthetic. Thanks for the pictures, especially this one: (Hmm, comparing yours again to mine, I think mine are too thick, perhaps adding to my difficulty). Hey, where are the fore tack bumpkins? I checked your build log, and don't see it anywhere. I checked the Practicum to see when Hunt installs them. They supposedly go between supports 3 and 4, but there's no evidence that Hunt installed them. And these are noticeably absent in this photo, which, by the way, really shows off the supports! This one is helpful in that it shows the relationship between the timbers (supports) and the grating. And then I found these, in the Practicum! (You know, I've got the hard copy of the Practicum at the shop and refer to it constantly, yet I don't seem to be able to find stuff until I'm sitting at home in front of my PC with its 42" monitor.) Timber 4: Timber 5: For what it's worth, even Hunt acknowledges difficulty making and placing these timbers. "The last timber (number 5) is the most difficult one. It sits at the outer edge of the cheek and is on an angle but still touches the third rail. Frankly, this timber was the most difficult of them all and I could not achieve the same look from the bow with this timber as the historic photo shows. I'm a bit disappointed in the structure but don't see anyway to improve or fix it. I'm not sure what the problem may be that is causing the overall look but will live with it as I fear I will seriously damage the model if I try to find a fix. Photo P8.1.5-11, P8.1.5-12 and P8.1.5-13 show the timber before being applied to the model." Back to the shipyard for me for more experimentation, and Thank you Unegawahya for your thoughtful response! Best
-
Still struggling to find the correct course, but I may be getting close to a support-first approach. Support 3 needs to be a little taller, so the mating face for rail 2 is in the right place. I think the key will be to get the slots for rail 3 correctly aligned. From there it should be downhill, in theory.. 🤔
-
That's pretty much how I started, but as mentioned, I've flipped the process on its head. I just copied everything I posted here over the last couple of months into Word, cleaning and editing as I went. The printed log, as a result, will be less busy than these posts, making for easier reading. Sticking with "Just the facts, maam". (How old do you have to be to get that reference? (don't answer that Gregg!))
-
Okay guys, you can look now.. *and you know who "you" are.. As long as I'm adding P.S.s, On the subject of gathering pdfs directly from this site, that would really help my new work flow. I actually post here first, then cut and past into a Word Document at home for my personal log, which I am printing in annual editions. Volume one was printed last June. Volume two is due to hit the presses in June this year. Cover Page of vol. 1:
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.