Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This may well be a pointless question. Nevertheless, and just in case there is someone willing to humour me, I'll ask.

 

It's whether for ship modelling there's any advantage to use a lathe or a mill in imperial rather than metric, seeing that the original plans are mostly in imperial measurements. An alternative to this question is its complementary one: why would one choose an imperial-based lathe or mill over a metric one?

 

My suspicion is that it wouldn't make much difference, especially as scaling down by 1/48 or 1/64 will mostly involve decimals in either of the two systems.

 

Any takers?

 

Tony

Posted (edited)

My preference would to be to use plans in decimal feet or metric, I would probably convert inches and fractions directly to decimal feet from plans before I did anyththing with them.

Generally when you are dealing with machine tools, you are working in decimals of something, ' inches or metric', as long as you are using base 10, it should make little difference when you setup the machines. Having been a Surveyor I like to work in decimals, that is what the slide rule, calculator and computers use anyway. Fractions are converted to decimals by those machines in order to work with them, if asked some will convert them back.  I don't really care for imperial numbers, an awkward way of manipulating numbers if there are any calculations involved. Mills is a much better way of measuring and displaying angles than degrees, Minutes and Seconds, unless you convert to Decimal Degrees. Any machine you will have available to you, will be using decimals, make a choice or take pot luck, they all will do the job, mine uses decimal inches, it's the 12 inches equals a foot and fraction inches that is a problem and only then when manipulating them for a math problem.

jud

Edited by shiloh
Posted
Posted

What ever you are comfortable with.  Easy enough to convert from one system to another.  It doesn't take much time when done by hand but most calculators can do it even faster.

My advice and comments are always worth what you paid for them.

Posted

Buy what will be easiest and comfortable for you.  Metric is European and Empirical is here in the states,  If the plans and scales you are working with are standard go standard.  If metric go metric.  Where I used to work we always converted to decimals for measuring and set ups.  But errors could always creep in.  I think you will be happy going the metric route.  Less converting and easier to scale.

David B 

Posted

My current model is a 1:48 of the Brig Eagle. For me, I  find it easier and more accurate to work in Metric. That said most of my dimensions are in both, but when it comes to cutting wood, I go to metric.

Bill

Chantilly, VA

 

Its not the size of the ship, but the bore of the cannon!

 

Current Build: Scratch Build Brig Eagle

 

Completed Build Log: USS Constitution - Mamoli

Completed Build Gallery: USS Constitution - Mamoli

 

Posted

Thanks grsjax, redshirt, David and Bill. I'm relieved at the answers as I work entirely in metric, but thought I'd better check in case there was something I was missing.

 

Tony

Posted

I have digital readouts on the lathe so I can use either/or.   The mill is inches.  But.. I use measurements from plans or take the dimensions offered on the plans.  Convert as needed.

Mark
"The shipwright is slow, but the wood is patient." - me

Current Build:                                                                                             
Past Builds:
 La Belle Poule 1765 - French Frigate from ANCRE plans - ON HOLD           Triton Cross-Section   

 NRG Hallf Hull Planking Kit                                                                            HMS Sphinx 1775 - Vanguard Models - 1:64               

 

Non-Ship Model:                                                                                         On hold, maybe forever:           

CH-53 Sikorsky - 1:48 - Revell - Completed                                                   Licorne - 1755 from Hahn Plans (Scratch) Version 2.0 (Abandoned)         

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Posted

Neat idea, Mark. One that I'll likely follow. Thanks.

 

Tony

Posted

Yes, I do agree, Nick. When I have to make conversions it'll be for use with metric-based systems -- which I'm already into, certainly in my head.

 

Tony

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...