Jump to content
HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! ×
2025 NRG PHOTOGRAPHIC SHIP MODEL CONTEST WINNERS ANNOUNCED ×
Ship Modeler's Handbook - Back in Stock ×

Chuck Seiler

NRG Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,876

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Chuck Seiler

  1. Chuck Seiler
    Progress continues. I have completed the frame extensions on the port side and added the top exterior plank strake. I am really having problems with the frame extensions. I primed and painted them while attached to the card, as the instructions recommended for the planking. While this prevents curling (if painted after removal) it leaves residue on surfaces I don't want residue on. Some of them were difficult to remove. It almost felt that they had been exposed to humidity and were kind of mushy. Southern California is not known for high humidity, but this is a strange summer. These are also frail beasties subject to breakage. Each time I would pick it up ( normally with visors...thus creating focal strangeness) I would have the chance of bumping into a frame. As you can see. Many were bent. A closer look at the frames. The yard supervisor greets a visiting tourist. I was told there would be a pool. Chris' ship has a pool. No ma'am, no pool. Chris' pool was planked over. Dang! Hey, you are not including me in your build log just to attract viewers are you. No ma'am. That would be ungentlemanly and I would not like to be accused of that. Besides, I have a job for you...as lookout. Everybody will be looking at you in the fighting top and ignoring the crappy hull planking. A look at the planking from the exterior as well as a closer look at the cargo hatch now in place. (Could be a pool cover). I added eye bolts to the hatch. In an effort to avoid SOME damage, I installed part of the starboard side top strake before continuing with the frame extensions.
  2. Chuck Seiler
    I am at that point now. I was watching out for this, but found a different problem. There is a part (135) in thicker cardboard, then there is a better quality but thinner overlay (135a). So for each you have 135L, 135aL, 135p and 135ap. In my case, some of the overlays are reversed so that 135aL covers 135P. As long as you are paying attention, it is not an issue. Great work so far Chris!!!
  3. Chuck Seiler
    I guess that would be dependent on the situation. If it was old fashioned hobby model building, probably water based. Epoxy and other resin glues were available, but I suspect were not used much by modelers. If you are looking at other applications, that may be different.
  4. Chuck Seiler
    Here is what I use.
  5. Chuck Seiler
    As I mentioned in my log, pretty clunky looking but it did the job. It didn't have to far or fast but it did have to haul the goods. Later, when speed became more important, the length to beam ratios changed.
  6. Chuck Seiler
    The thing up forward? I have seen it described as an above deck, athwartship deck beam...as opposed to the 4 or 5 that are below deck. They all end up sticking out the sides like an old adobe house in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Fore warned is fore armed. I am about a week away from that.
  7. Chuck Seiler
    It's like an Easter egg hunt.
  8. Chuck Seiler
    Originally a question...now a cautionary tale. As I am almost finished hull planking, I come to a part where I make a caprail sort of structure for the stern. The sheet has parts 131, 131a and 132. ...however the instructions only tell me about 131 and 131a. I scoured the instructions and saw nothing on this. I THINK I know what it is for, but I don't want to do anything the instructions don't tell me (as if THAT has ever happened before). My question was going to be...what is this for? As I was pondering this, Chris posted some shots of his progress. Huzzah!!!! There it is!!!!! Question answered, but another example of SHIPYARD instructions being incomplete.
  9. Chuck Seiler
    SURPRISE!!!!
  10. Chuck Seiler
    Acronyms- They are the spice of life. ALLRIGHTY!!!!! We got to page 2!!!!
  11. Chuck Seiler
    Bwa ha ha ha ha!!!!!!! 🤪
  12. Chuck Seiler
    While the two SHIPYARD models above are not the definitive authority on cogs, I believe they do faithfully represent two styles of cog as seen in many of the paintings, coins and tapestries you have posted. I would also like to throw in-various replicas. While one style has NO fore-castle, another has a very clear forward castle integrally built into the ship. WH appears to represent the middle ground where you can take your basic commercial cog, run down to Home Depot and get some lumber, slap together a forecastle and duct tape it to the bodacious stempiece. Obviously the various depictions span several centuries and can be attributed to different building styles and conditions. The ones with the Home Depot Fore-castles (HDFC) could well be ones built in less than tumultuous times but were pressed into military service or added when the threat suddenly increased.
  13. Chuck Seiler
    Steven, Many thanks. I appreciate it. In my limited but growing research, I have come to appreciate all your posts and info on medieval ships and architecture. Medieval ships have supplanted US Colonial navy as my current area of interest. I am looking at building the DUSEK COG incorporating some of your critiques of another build.
  14. Chuck Seiler
    Construction on the hull continues. So far so good, as long as you don't look too close. That's a better look. Clinker + a bunch. We are now cresting above the deck. As mentioned above, I am finding the strake about .25 inches to short, so I need to cut out a plank and insert a longer one. Close up of the plank. Painting is not as good. Long story. Same plank, inboard side, showing supports. The support on the right is a kit supplied double thick frame extension, placed there due to butt joint. The one on the left is self made. The kit was not supposed to have an actual but joint here.
  15. Chuck Seiler
    I used Golden Pecan either for the interior or exterior of my PHILADELPHIA. It's a great color...good choice. The nails look good without the pencil dots. Are you staining the interior as well? If so are you using oil based or water based. My concern is for the glu-ability of interior frame extensions and other support lattices.
  16. Chuck Seiler
    My decks are wood and I gave them a coat of Wipe On Poly. On my first extension, it stuck to the planks but not the deck. For follow-on extensions, I had to rough up the spot on the deck a little.
  17. Chuck Seiler
    For me it is more than 37...or maybe 37 with complications. Since I am having to cut some of the planking pieces and inserting longer planks (see above)(edit...oh wait, this is your log, not mine...see my log for discussion on planks) I need double thick frame extensions at the point where the joint is. So far so good.
  18. Chuck Seiler
    An Amati kit with a defect? This is my shocked face. Seriously though, you should be able to repair with a touch of sandpaper. Hopefully you will be painting the hull.
  19. Chuck Seiler
    Was that really all that extraordinary? How did the common folk on land 'answer the call of nature'?
  20. Chuck Seiler
  21. Chuck Seiler
    Progress on hull planking continues. Pictures on the way. I just wanted to post as potential warning for other builders. Progressing past clinker +6 I am finding that EVERY strake is about a quarter inch too short. I am not sure why because I am hitting all my other reference marks. I fixed the problem by laying the forward most piece (usually 2 planks), cutting the first plank from the aft piece, making a plank to make up the difference in length, lay that, then lay the last section so it ends up where it is supposed to be in the stern. So far so good, but it is annoying.
  22. Chuck Seiler
    Ken, Many thanks.
  23. Chuck Seiler
    When all is said and done, by the time you get the stain and no pencil dots, the existing 'nails' will be visible but sufficiently subdued so as not to overwhelm the model, like on mine.
  24. Chuck Seiler
    As I said, the pointy end looks alot like the round end.
  25. Chuck Seiler
    Looking good! Will you pencil dot your nails later or leave them as they are?

About us

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

SSL Secured

Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured

NRG Mailing Address

Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917

Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)

Helpful Links

About the NRG

If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.

The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.

The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.

Our Emblem ®

Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research

Nautical Research Guild ® and the NRG logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,999,236 & No. 6,999,237, registered March 14, 2023)

×
×
  • Create New...