Jump to content

russ

Members
  • Posts

    3,086
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by russ

  1. Pat: Thanks for the kind words. I need to get this project moving along as I have a few others who are waiting patiently for space on the bench. Russ
  2. Generally, the carriages were painted the same as the inner bulwarks and other deck fittings. I think the dull dark red would be a good choice. Russ
  3. I would contact Model Expo and request a replacement part. They will send it free of charge. This is their mistake and they will make it right. They are very good about it from all accounts. Russ
  4. The stand looks good. However, if you are worried about it being knocked about by the cleaning crew, please consider a case of some sort. Russ
  5. John: Thanks. As the weather cools a bit, I have been able to do some work in the shop. Russ
  6. Here is a little more progress. Got some time to work on some deck fixtures. There is still a good deal more fitting to be done. The corner joints on the hatch coamings still need some cleaning up and the coamings need to have their bottom edges cambered to match the deck. Russ
  7. With the counter framing faired, it is much easier to see the shape of the stern. Very nice work. Russ
  8. I would think that the Sultana's general belaying plan would be a good guide for the Hannah. They were of the same general area and vintage. They probably used shroud cleats and various timberheads for belaying points. There are some photos of Harold Hahn's fully rigged model of the Hannah in his book Colonial Schooners. Russ
  9. You should contact Model Expo. Call and email them. They will be able to provide a list of materials. Russ
  10. The spars look very good. The tapering appears to be correct. So often spars are not tapered enough, but yours came out very well. Russ
  11. No rope between the ends of the gaffs and booms. As for the headsails, it is optional. If you are not going to show any sails, you can simply omit the downhauls and halyards. Same for any topsails. Typically, the gaffs would be lowered if not sails were set, but you can show the gaffs up if it pleases you to have them that way. Your choice. Russ
  12. You could lace them to the mast, but my bet is that they actually used hoops. If you can lace it to the masts that would be good. Still a bit fiddly with the masts and shrouds in place. Be careful. Russ
  13. Sails might be a bit problematic right now since the masts are already in and the standing rigging is set up. The sails would be attached to hoops that fit around the masts. Those hoops really need to be on the mast before it is stepped. The better order of masting and rigging would to make hoops and stitch them to the completed sails, then lace the sails to the gaffs and booms, then fit the hoops over the masthead, then attach the crosstrees etc and step the masts and then the standing rigging. The gaffs and booms would be pre rigged with halyard and sheet blocks so that they could rigged once the standing rigging is set up. That said, you could try and use brass split rings for the hoops and open the rings slightly to get them around the masts and then squeeze them closed so they do not look like they are split rings. Russ
  14. The fact that there is an adjustable tackle at the deck is why it is called a shifting backstay. There are many different variations on this theme over the years, but this is essentially what you have. Russ
  15. On similar lines down here in South Mississippi, they seized a loop at the top, then ran it down through a hole in the spreader (or sometimes just a "v" cut in the end of the spreader) and then down to a standard deadeye and lanyard arrangement. However your seems to be a shifting backstay, thus the tackle near the deck and the belay to the cleat. Ours were two separate lines port and starboard so far as I can tell. Russ
  16. The barrel staves look much better. That is a nice detail. You can use paper or tape for the hoops. Once they are painted, they will look every bit the real thing. Russ
  17. Brian: That line of which you speak is just not very good stuff. I have seen it and it is worth it to replace it if you can. I have used both cotton and linen and found that they are both good to work with. Clove hitches are no problem with cotton or linen. I prefer Egyptian cotton. Ratlines should be about 1/2" diameter. At your scale, that would be .006". That is very small so you would probably have to get something relatively close. Russ
  18. Gary: The lower yards were sometimes raised and lowered. Not as much as the upper yards, but it seems the lower yards were raised and lowered slightly. According to Lees on page 69 of The Masting and Rigging of English Ships of War, 1625-1860, you can put an eyebolt in the bottom of the cap on either side near the edge of the cap to take a block that will handle the lift. You can also seize blocks in either end of a line and wrap that line around the cap so that the blocks hang off either side. That is a slightly earlier method. I would go with the eyebolts personally. So, you can either follow the plans or do something else. Since the rigging plans follow that of the Annapolis model, you are covered if anyone wants to question your rigging. Either way, you are good to go with whichever method you choose. Russ
×
×
  • Create New...