HOLIDAY DONATION DRIVE - SUPPORT MSW - DO YOUR PART TO KEEP THIS GREAT FORUM GOING! (89 donations so far out of 49,000 members - C'mon guys!)
×
rwiederrich
-
Posts
5,518 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by rwiederrich
-
That has always been the question. McKay quickly flattened out the dead rise of subsequent designs....some with less than 8deg deadrise. Flat bottom boats handled better. but Staghound had an extreme entry/exit along with a 40" deadrise. I've read no reports that she handled poorly. Rob
-
Now I’ll let it dry and tomorrow I’ll begin chamfering them. I also drew out the cut water by transferring the stem to a piece of maple. I will work on the plank sheet height for the naval hood at that time. Rob
-
Then I added bulkhead braces.
-
Now the bulkheads are glued in. On a straight keel.
-
Spent some time in the shop. I disassembled the hull, because it had a warp in the keel So I drilled and pinned it to the desk. I aligned the pins so they were straight. I then pressed the keel down and there you go Now for some gluing Rob
-
Thanks Gary. In a couple more days I think I’ll get to work. Rob
-
I'm sorry for any delays my friends...but I have been under the weather for the last 3 days....just now getting my strength back. fighting a tough cough. My annual Bronchitis battle. I hope to get going in a couple of days. I first have to trace the stem so I can make the cutwater and root for the naval hood. Rich...we decided she had a 3ft keel is that correct. I'll be reinforcing her bulkheads as well....similar to that of Glory of the Seas. Measuring her frames...it is true she was a narrow thing. She'll widen up after I plank her. Still 24ft at the skylight/companionway on her poop is pretty narrow. Almost makes her deck furniture seam too large.. First things first. Rob
-
Pm Clipperfan and he’ll lay it all out for you. Fascinating stuff. Rob
-
Pm Clipperfan and he’ll lay it all out for you. Fascinating stuff. Rob
- 194 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Cloud
- Mamoli
- (and 1 more)
-
Dry fitting the bulkheads. Rob
-
Gluing the two keel pieces together. I won't fiddle with this till it is full dry. I’ll separate the bulkheads and put them in order. She a lot smaller then Glory of the Seas for sure. Rob
-
Test fit the keel. Nice clean aligned fit. Rob
-
Looky. What I got today. Rob
-
Ships are balanced....thus we must look at them balanced. If something looks wrong, stop and evaluate...educate yourself on the trueness of the design. Don't just go for it....not unless you don't care. Taking into consideration how long it takes to build one of these guys....it's best, to take the extra step and make sure, or you will suffer the agony of having to look at your incorrect model for the rest of your life and continually telling/reminding yourself, *I should have just fixed it when it was easier*. You've already taken the first step of admission. No need to beat yourself up over it. She is still something to be proud of... indeed. Rob
- 431 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
-
Rich...it was just as much my mistake as it was yours. I knew visually the Forecastle looked too low...coupled with the original main rail issue.....I just looked at it incorrectly. And that, in of itself, is part of the problem. Knowing better but allowing your own bias or laziness to get in the way. I know, now, what pitfalls to avoid...since we cut our teeth on Glory of the Seas. In these adventures, I expect you to be clear and honest...throw a rock at me, if need be, to get my attention, If you think something is out of place historically. We can always discuss it....as we have done in the past. Rob
-
Sometimes, stumbling across knew data, that was in plain sight counts as *measuring* twice....... Rob
-
Rich..check this out....
-
Jared...I feel ya. Once we have built a significant part of our vessel...to tear it all out is a gut wrenching notion. I crossed that same threshold myself....but because I was part of a group trying to realize the true structures of a McKay clipper....I was compelled to make the untimely correction....if I had any hope of staying the course of producing the most accurate McKay vessel thus far. It just had to be done...and it surely wasn't beyond my ability. It became a matter of the will.
- 431 replies
-
- 3
-
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
-
Indeed, and that is the plight of so many. They are told....but that is usually by someone who doesn't know themselves. No Criticism is intended.....we are telling people now...when we come across them. The ultimate desire is to get manufacturers to make the changes....so as not to lead builders astray. That is the hardest task at hand. Rob
- 431 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
-
We do not wish for any builder of these kits to feel belittled or criticized in any way. These discoveries came to Rich and myself many years ago and we were just as surprised as many of these kit builders are, when we discovered them. But as you say,.....we wish to help and correct these issues for others who are making this journey. Rich is creating a plan to make these revelations known to the general modeling public and to manufacturers of said kits. But currently....all we can do is intercept builders as they build their models and if possible, reveal our findings, so they can self correct their own models. Rob
-
I all fairness. Modelers who undergo one of these kits....are putting great trust in the research the model designers have done. The designers are putting a great amount of trust in the hopes that the modelers are not historians and will not be aware their kits are full of inaccuracies. Buyer beware....or in this case modeler. It's really an easy fix for modelers....but it requires foreknowledge. Its easy for manufacturers....it only takes a little retooling and redrawing. Accuracy requires effort. Rob
- 431 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
-
Rich....I completely agree with your assessment. We have talked these issues through plenty of times before. It is difficult when builders have simply followed their models plans, and we come along. No disrespect to any builder...for sure, but it is nice to lead builders in the right direction when these issues are found out early....before the damage is done. I praise Jared and others on their builds...not on the poor drawings they have followed. It boils down to research. I pray we can encourage others to notice the errors and correct them before they get too far along. On the other hand...they are doing good with what they got. Just trying to help...as you are. Rob
-
Have you been following the changes that have been recently discovered about the McKay naval hoods and cutwater? Kits today are misrepresenting the bow of McKay clippers...and they are sorely inaccurate. I hope you have seen the info, Clipperfan has amassed on the subject. Good build. Rob
-
Wonderful job....I hope you have been following the threads on the newly realized McKay cutwater and naval hoods..... and forecastle changes to the plans of these models. Most manufacturers get it all wrong, making their models sorely inaccurate. Good build. Rob
- 194 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Cloud
- Mamoli
- (and 1 more)
-
And so it begins.... Rigging stays, backstays and headgear. Standing rigging is the strength of the framework that holds the masting, to which the sails are energized. A world, all in of itself.... Good job! Rob
- 431 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- Flying Fish
- Model Shipways
- (and 2 more)
Our Emblem ®
