Jump to content

Veszett Roka

Members
  • Posts

    380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Veszett Roka

  1. Thats a boomer I think a few minutes how would i recover the clamp
  2. Very nice Bill, i personally like her colors.
  3. No any special reason Keith, just exchanging techniques and experiences. My particular reason is the Pamir 1:150 model, which has the polystyrene (cookie box) windows, but i'm unsatisfied the result due the thickness of the portholes. You can see the 'glass' only when looking into portholes dead straight. At least i know they are in... And Nils' approach with solid transparent rod insert would be better for me too. However, my 1:350 Titanic bridge had same transparent windows with suitable results - that one has full strip inside the bridge and the borders, storm boards etc. are printed/cutout on a paper strip and that paper strip covers the inner side of the bridge.
  4. Yes, i encountered this also. So i'm using very thin two sided adheshive tapes at the windows edges, or Revell Contacta Professional glue (butylacetate) - depends on the scale and material. If i don't want the interior be visible i cover the inner side with matte adheshive tape (Cellux). Now i will try the silicone rod.
  5. Thats a great idea Nils. Usually i do the glassing from transparent vacuum-formed cookie packaging, this is thin enough but not too rigid - need to sand the inner side of the window quite flat, otherwise the 'glass' will be wavy.
  6. Hi Nils, Helmut's model is definitely wrong, unfortunately. The 'skirt' must be in line with the rear cover, his model has taller deckhouse and the skirt is taller too. For me it looks like the rear deck cover is too low, it hasn't the same curve - but it could be because the different viewpoints too. The original: and the model: After all, we can live with it. You will need to made that skirt to abit thicker (taller) to match to the real ship then. Still a beautiful model.
  7. Hi Nils, you know i'm following your build in great interest and admiration. Now however, considering the original i must draw your attention that the long deckhouse is higher than it must be. The deckhouse top must met the rear deck cover like this photo:
  8. Thats right Eberhard, there was no scheme, but the Laeisz fleet was painted this way by purpose. Laeisz was proud of his Flying-P fleet and intended to easily recognize the P ships. The Laeisz shipping company is still working today, and they are happily follow this tradition e.g. the pride, but their ships are more colorful nowadays. I was talked one of their officer then in Hamburg. Also right Valery, however the white line was not antifouling paint. Red one was (either the pinkier tone mercury-oxide or more burgundy color lead-oxide) the antifouling. I had opportunity to paint them in real life so much time
  9. Valery, in 1912 the waterline marks were the standard Plimsoll mark, mandatory painted on midships since 1894. However, this isn't exclude to paint the big white line for better visibility. Edit: Until 1930, the Plimsoll mark was required for all ship only who visiting British ports. It is required for all vessels since 1930 so you were right.
  10. Laeisz Flying P ships were painted the black-white-red scheme because that time this scheme was the colors of the German Merchant Marine. However, the tree tone painting wasn't unusual that time, two almost identical examples are Balclutha (San Francisco Maritime Museum) and Wavertree (South Street Seaport Museum, New York). Also, Pelican of London barquentine (built 1946) still sails with this color scheme
  11. Hi Nils, I know very little about the German Merchant Marine, so it might be false question, but: Didn't the FIRE boxes has to be Feuerlöschgerät or something similar? They sign the boxes English instead of German?
  12. An engineer's work. A careful and precise engineer's. Marvellous.
  13. Hi Keith, with this thickness of the planks, wouldn't you need to sand down the edges to a little V shape, to fit the planks perfectly? I'm mainly thinking of the engine room area
  14. Hi Nils, i would definitely keep those paint patches, and after total drying i'd paint them over with a darker red and then weather them with rusty brown. That will look like a repairing i guess, adding some extra 'details' then.
  15. As IT engineer, i have to agree with you, but keep in mind that those frustration comes from marketing (to push you to buy new gadgets). They simply cut out the older communication protocols, however those would be much smaller than a new menu system. This is why the new car cannot communicate with old iPad. Eberhard, i came initially grom GCOS (Honeywell-Bull) world, then moved to VAX/VMS, now using Linux.
  16. Nils, i'd go with bandaging gauze then. Thick paint will made it perfect.
  17. Hi Nils, will the railing covered by canvas or other material? The plan shows it something solid
  18. Bill, an alternative might be to display Victory slightly listed and some work performed under the waterline from a launch, maybe combination of lexan/epoxy resin. It wouldn't cause much confusion because you did not build Victory with full sail set. A few ropes from the deck to the launch could add to the realism, maybe you could fabricate a floating platform with handymen. In reality when they listed their ship they moved all the guns to one side, plus all the ballast too, let say they doing it hidden under the deck. Just an idea.
  19. Congratulations Bill, it is magnificent! Anyhow, for the margin of 'dioramic liberty' i can imagine the depicted situation. Le Soleil Royal is about to depart from Brest, they set sails in time but there is not too much wind as seen here. The sails mostly hanging on the masts thus Admiral Tourville ordered the crew to last minute ship in some extra barrels of fine french wine, and some timber because the ship's carpenter discovered a few minor leak since the departure. Adm. Tourville is a noble man, therefore the port authority immediately sent out a few launch with the desired reinforcements. And voila. And pardon me to take the opportinity to tell this silly tale. Really a good diorama.
  20. Tom - much of it can't be seen through the skylight so I can cheat. Don't cheat, you cannot go nowhere without that WD40 Keith! Can't see the duct tape however, that must be in the drawer.
  21. Unfortunately not. Maybe the author, Mike Maynard, who served on that ship? At least the readers cheered him because the model, but nowhere else mentioned who is the builder exactly.
  22. Thank you Nils. Fortunately she is still afloat in Bedford, Massachusets, could be seen there. But check out this excellent model, this was the one which ignited my interest many years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...