Jump to content

NavyShooter

Members
  • Posts

    688
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Windsor Junction, NS

Recent Profile Visitors

2,653 profile views
  1. Phil, that's amazing brass work! Well done good sir! You have the 'heat shield' part of the grenade lockers right - having been an ammunition custodian on a modern warship (Halifax Class) all of our upper deck lockers had a heat shield which was normally painted white that was stood off a couple of inches from the lockers to provide shade and natural cooling. Originally, as fitted, the ships didn't have these heat shields, and we ended up having to put shot matts on top of some of the lockers and put a fire-hose spraying a light amount of water over them to provide some cooling while in the Persian Gulf back in the 2001 time-frame.
  2. The two test shots went between 30-80 feet I think. The one fired with the cover/door open already flew straighter than the one which had the door closed. I'm pondering the results.
  3. Today was the test launch day for V4 of the VLS system. Worked ok. I sealed the entry point for the ignitor into the launch tube with hot glue, and it looks like one of them didn't seal quite perfectly, that's OK...it's a learning curve. The second was better sealed. The brass plates I glued into the J-tube at the bottom got blasted apart - viewed with a flashlight, it's clearly destroyed. The one without the brass survived the shot OK as well - so - I think I'm going to go without the brass and make them expendable after a single shot instead of worrying about the brass if it's going to get destroyed anyhow. The missiles - first shot went straight up about 60-80 feet or so and the parachute ejection charge went "pop" quite nicely up in the air. Shredded the 'missile' - I considered it expendable anyhow, so no big deal. I had the launch door open for the first shot, so it went straighter. The second shot I left the launch door closed, and it opened just fine when fired - but I think that deflected the shot and so it went across instead of up - ended up about 30 feet away, 30 feet up in a tree when it popped the parachute ejection charge. Overall - I am pleased.
  4. I have no formal confirmation as to exactly where things go, so this is my 'best guess' based on some informal chats with some friends. I'm open to being incorrect....in fact, I know there's parts of this model that are wrong, but that's OK since the ships themselves don't even exist yet. Nice thing about it being a 3D design is that I can adjust on the fly, and V3 will be closer than V2....and V4 will be even closer still.
  5. Hoisted a flag (ok, it's glued in place...whatever....) and am calling V2 complete. Here we have DDH 241 - HMCS MacKenzie The next one will be the first of the R/C version(s?) - we'll see how it goes. I'm quite pleased with how this is looking. I understand that this is closer to the 'actual' look, but not quite correct - V3 has further revisions to the superstructure to match the RCN version more closely.
  6. V2 is ready for decals, and some of the 'detail bits' have been glued on.
  7. Observation - the below the waterline colour on the ship should be BLACK not red. That was some feedback I got from the crew of HMCS Sackville as I was working on my model of her (and the St Thomas model I did as well.) NS
  8. OK, HMCS St Thomas will likely be moving to Ontario this summer (at last) and I've got a model of HMCS Sackville that's spent the summer in the pond. Here's the touch-up paint on the hull of Sackville that I applied today. I'll do the port side tomorrow.
  9. OK, so, paint is applied, I need to paint the decks (tomorrow) and then we can start glue action to put some of the little bits on!
  10. Ian, I will suggest that BOTH platforms would have a Nav Radar. A longer one with longer pulse-length that will perform better in the rain, and a shorter one that's more precise, but susceptible to weather impact. Also, being a ship conducting passenger travel, it may be required by IMO regulations to have 2x Nav Radar sets. As for lights - you should have a white masthead steaming light. Brad
  11. Looks like a neat build! Are you planning on having the ramp functional?
  12. Anddd.....bumped into a buddy over the weekend who's working on the project, and it turns out I had the right version of the RAM launcher initially.... The 11 shot SeaRAM launcher is (I think - based on my assumptions) designed for ships that need a stand-alone AA missile system. The 21 shot launcher is designed for ships that have an integrated Combat Management system and don't need a launcher with it's own integral detection/engagement Radar system. So. Back to the 21 shot launcher I guess.
×
×
  • Create New...