Jump to content

Baker

Members
  • Posts

    3,662
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Baker

  1. I fully agree. But, the advantage of the MRNS book is that I have a lot of drawings on a scale of 1/100. And it is easy for me to enlarge them to a scale of 1/50. So I'm going to make the sections of MRNS and place them next to the current bulkheads. And then see what makes the most sense. I promesed this build would be a long way to a finished model. I'm doing this well, haha 😇
  2. indeed. From now on, MRNS will be the first source of information to consult.
  3. Spending more and more time on my Mary Rose, a small update. The 6 x 6 is assembled and painted in the camuaflage sceme. The 8 x 8 box opened and started Thanks for following
  4. Testing my suspicion. After enlarging the section drawings from the MRNS book, these sections were all copied separately. A first test clearly shows a difference with the drawings (bulkheads) from the AOTS book. Grrr All these (some of of them expensive) books and in none of them you find the simple mention about the length - width of the hull. So i continue with the keel length and the beam in feet. Length keel 60,... cm and beam 23,... cm. The sections from MRNS seem to match better the 23cm than the bulkheads from AOTS 24.5cm Next plan. Making these extra bulkheads and do a better shaping of the the already made bulkheads. Better to do well now than to have problems later.
  5. Congrats. Very well done. Your attention to detail and the will to do everything right is highly appreciated. 👍 greetings Patrick
  6. when i was your age, i had the same problem. enjoy it as mutch as possible, time will go faster and faster as you get older and older.
  7. do not know. I think the era of this ship is a transition period. from triangular to round
  8. Nice work.but some advise. your dead eyes are too high above the channels
×
×
  • Create New...