Jump to content
MORE HANDBOOKS ARE ON THEIR WAY! We will let you know when they get here. ×

Baker

Members
  • Posts

    4,178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Baker

  1. His model participates in competitions, the aim is to follow the plans you have as faithfully as possible. He succeeds well in this and has already won several prizes. No one knows whether the model is completely historically correct, no detailed construction drawings were made during the era of 16th century period.
  2. With the beam for the swivels on the port side also installed and the frames made thinner, time to continue working on the transom. The clinker planking that was previously installed has been removed. And the intention is to install two stern chasers here, the openings of the swivels will then remain empty. Applying the same number of cannons as the Anthony drawing is not feasible. A nice drawing to show to a king, but not a practical design in reality. Several attempts... And after three attempts it became this. Finish the holes for the swivels with a beam on top First i make grooves. This is more work, but positioning the beam correctly is much easier. And above this beam back to clinker planking. This will provide more strength when the frames are made thinner later.
  3. If you drive it into a mine field, and the tracks "fly in the air". Then it does not matter which model of tank you are in. You are, as they so aptly say in English, a sitting duck. 😪
  4. And good luck
  5. wow. An comment with so much poetry gets not one, but three smileys
  6. All wales on the clinker planking are installed. On the starboard side a beam has been simulated where the swivel cannons will later be placed And the thinning of the frames has begun First a pencil line. Then the more "heavy tools", used carefully of course. One side is from 6 to 5 mm, the intention is to later make the frames even thinner above the beam of the swivels to 4 or, if possible, 3 mm
  7. You're doing very well. And it is very nice to follow. I would only attach the backstays of the fore and main mast more forward, like on the mizzen mast. If you tie them so far back they can get in the way of later rigging.
  8. First of all, I have little or no knowledge of ships from this period. But, the stones of the mosaic all seem to be the same size. So the poor guy who placed the mosaic has little room to make something as small as the stock taper. There is also a chance that he knew more about laying mosaics than about ships. I wouldn't rely on just this mosaic as a basis for your anchor.
  9. Thank you for the nice comments. The planking at the bow has been further sanded and fitted with treenails. Back to the rear castle. Smaller wales (4) are placed on the clinker planking. Of course, none of the four have the same dimensions. The drawings and photos are partly used to determine the "right" location. The dimensions between the wales are also taken into account for future painting works. According to Mary's remains, the Wales certainly continue as far as sector 10 (the penultimate cannon port) "penultimate" A new English word for me (hopefully Mr. Google translate is correct 😳) After applying these wales I have to read my books and think first. The "frames" of the rear castle are much too thick. And the clinker planking on the transom also feels wrong. This means extra sanding and cutting, probably a redo and a smiley. Thanks for following
  10. indeed. There was also a VW kubelwagen and an NSU kettenkrad. They were fun to build.
  11. You didn't screwed something up. I had the same problem in the 80's.
  12. And good luck on the road to Victory 😉
×
×
  • Create New...