rcweir

Rats, I put this in the wrong section. Which makes me cross, of course! I hope a friendly admin can move it to the 1501-1750 kit section!

This is a new kit by Kolderstok, a Dutch company that specializes in a category especially appealing to me: 17th Dutch vessels. "Pinas" is a ship type, and the prime reference for modelers is a lengthy treatise on Dutch shipbuilding practices, written in 1671 by Nicolaes Witsen, in which he uses the pinas as his example for all aspects of construction. Fortunately, Ab Hoving has given us a new version of Witsen, organized coherently, heavily annotated, and in English, in his Nicolaes Witsen and Shipbuilding in the Dutch Golden Age, College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2012. This model was designed by Matthias Noback (it's the first Kolderstok kit not designed by Hans van Nieuwkoop), and you can find a blog of his design effort elsewhere on the web. Additionally, while there are no other build logs for this kit on MSW yet, there are a few others out there which have been a great help to me (and thank goodness for Google translate!) My kit arrived on 12 April, in good order, after a lengthy journey through the Dutch and US postal systems. It was carefully packed, and everything on the inventory list was in the box, and in excellent condition. All of the wood, except for the dowels, is basswood. That includes all the laser cut sheets - there is no plywood. The accessories appear to me to be all high quality - the blocks look great and the brass cannon are beautiful. Along with the kit I ordered a full set of Kolderstok paints. I didn't get the premium "luxury rope" rigging line, figuring that my existing stash of line would cover my needs. That's all for this post. The next one might also happen today, and will cover some pre-build decisions and samples.

Interesting looking chisel. Is it Japanese?

I share the enthusiasm, in spades! Toni's half hull project came at a perfect time for me and this project does, too. I can hardly wait.

I've just finished reading Learmont's Master in Sail, and since I didn't find any mention of Capt. Learmont on MSW, I thought it was worth adding a note about his book. It's an autobiography of a Scottish merchant captain who sailed deep sea ships from 1887-1910. Learmont is a no-nonsense writer, but his accounts of his voyages are rivetting. I think anyone who's read and enjoyed The Last Grain Race or Two Years Before the Mast will find Learmont's book is a great companion to them. His details of navigation, sailing, handling cargos and owners, all are fascinating. My edition is, I think, the first one dated 1950 and published by Percival Marshall. It's not illustrated, but the book is easily findable on bookfinder.com and some editions do have photos. I also note that Alan Villiers mentions Learmont in several places in The Way of a Ship. It's clear that Villiers thinks highly of Learmont, and one of his comments about how to be successful sailing around the Horn is almost a direct quote from Learmont. All in all, I found it a wonderful account.

Dunno. What you want, I think, is something that's dimensionally consistent in its reaction to the environment and is reasonable to sand to give a good gluing surface for your planks.

I'd use baltic birch plywood for the bulkheads and clear white pine for the hull planking and most everything else. I once made a 17' kayak, with 1/4" strips for the hull (red cedar & white pine) covered in plexiglass, and that project has some similarities to your hull. For the strongback longitudinal I carefully chose a long, straight, clear piece of structural grade Douglas fir. The strongback was the most expensive piece of wood in the project, but it ensured the resulting boat was straight.

I was taught to use 1/2 lb cut as a wash coat and sealer. It raises the hairs so they can be lightly sanded off, and it's thin enough that you can use any topcoat over it.

I have a copy of McKee and he says 9 inches. He terms it chasing, where a sloping rabbet is cut into the top edge of the strake below the one being installed. At this point he's talking specifically about his 10' example boat. I haven't found anywhere that he gives more general guidance on chasing, though he does mention that there are other ways than a sloping rabbet to get the plank end down so it can fit into the stem or stern rabbet. I don't think I have the terminology completely figured out, but the 9" measurement is definite for his 10' boat. The McKee is a pretty neat little publication. It includes a card half-hull model of his 10' example boat.

Navy coffee, on the other hand, was for connoisseurs! We made port visits in Australia a few many years ago and a cup of the wardroom java was a must-have for visitors. (I highly recommend choosing a service where you can take your diningroom and bedroom on every trip.)

Well, there's a silver lining: I now know about Alexandros Models and have just made an order - perfect gifts for history enthusiasts!

Ditto on the mini-saw recommendation - I have long wanted a tiny keyhole-type saw like this one! Glenn, your progress on the model is impressive! It's part of my daily routine to check how the Indy models are progressing - they're quite an inspiration to me. The opportunity to watch four different, skillful modelers work their ways through the same build, in parallel is unique. Thanks for sharing!

Thanks Mark, That's very helpful. I'm moving ahead on the "round above" principle. I'm also continuing to study those photos of Mayflower II's mast; there are subtleties in the transitions from round to flatish to round and back to flat that my eyes couldn't pick out so easily, initially. I don't think it will make any difference in what I produce in the model, but it's still very interesting. Bob

I have finally started on the rigging of my (Model Shipways) Mayflower, and this weekend's task is to start working on the mastheads, i.e. the area from the hounds to the cap. I've got three reputable authorities to look at for how to do it and I'd appreciate some opinions as to which is preferred. The first example is how the kit instructions show that area. As you can see below, Chuck (our Chuck Passaro is the kit designer), has flats for the cheeks and then a tenon for the cap. Otherwise the mast is round. This is a straightforward way of dealing with a mast that started out as a round dowel. The next photo is from Brian Lavery's AOS on the Susan Constant, a ship 2/3 the tonnage of Mayflower, but nearly identical dates. (And note that Lavery is creating his design 30 years after Baker's Mayflower II.) Lavery's mastheads are square from the hounds to the tippity top. Looks entirely sensible to me, but the practical problem is that the sides of the square area are about the same width as the mast diameter and I don't have the meat on my dowels to do this. So I'd have to build it up. For that reason, I don't think I'll do it the Lavery way. The third example is from the real Mayflower II. Here's one of the mastheads on the pier during its recent major overhaul. (I wish I'd taken measurements with these pics.) It looks like the flat area for the cheeks and trestletree is slightly less than the diameter of the mast. Above that the mast is round again, and is finished with a tenon for the cap. I think this construction is basically the same Chuck's, except that he's simplified the details a bit for the kit builder. I think I'm going to do something as close to the Mayflower II form as I can. But, regardless of what I do for this model, I'd like to know whether one or the other is more correct. And I'd also like to know how others tackle the problem of large square sections on masts that start out as kit dowels.

FWIW, here is some work laminating HMS Victory's planking in the summer of '71.

I don't know if there's an official way to ask that question, but I'd consider these things: 1. Post the question in the ModelWarships.com forum in the USS Nimitz topic area, http://www.shipmodels.info/mws_forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=4705. 2. Search on the internet for photos of the Nimitz in the dates you think she might have been on the transit. 3. Ditto, if you know some of her stops along the way, look for press coverage of the visit: the escorts might happen to show up. 4. Write a letter or send email to the PAO (Public Affairs Officer) on the Nimitz. It's possible that there are reasonably convenient records they could check (they probably won't be able or willing to root through the deck logs). 5. Look through this: https://www.navysite.de/cruisebooks/cvn68-86/001.htm It appears to be her cruise book for the period that includes the move.

The photography, too, is superb. It will be fun following this one.

What a great project! I've gotten my Speedwell books and will join the group project as soon as it appears, even if I have to have two projects going at the same time. I love the large scale and the size of the finished model (though I probably won't rig mine). A question about finish: if the frames are going to be exposed, shouldn't poly (or whatever) be going on the frame sides as they're assembled?

In William Baker's The New Mayflower Her Design and Construction, Barre Gazette, 1958, he talks at length about how he arrived at his design. It looks to me that he's done a thorough job researching what he ultimately produced and he gives sources for anyone who wants to follow in his steps. I don't recall that he discussed the possibility that the ship wasn't built in England. (But he does consider the possibility it was clinker-built!) I'll also mention that the book includes a very nice set of plans for his conception of the original Mayflower: the plans have none of Mayflower II's concessions for the modern era. And besides the plans, the book contains much specific detail that is useful for modelers.

All three of them are beautiful.

Sorry to hear that you have eye trouble. Coincidentally, I'm just finishing up a re-read of 'Two Years Before the Mast'. When Richard Henry Dana wrote that book he was about your age and had eye trouble, too. His solution was to go to sea for a couple of years to give his eyes a rest.

Great! Thanks Ab. Bob

What's the right shape for the deadeyes in a mid-17th century Dutch ship? The written references I have don't say. The plans I have of ships of that period all show round. The Wasa (1628, and not Dutch but also not English) has triangular. And, from what I can tell by pics on the web, the replica Batavia (same date as Wasa) has triangular. Apologies if this question has been asked here before, but I didn't find that it had been. Bob

Those are wonderful photos! Thanks for posting.

The painting is a big deal for this model and yours is looking great. The crest on the transom looks especially convincing. What paint are you using? Bob