-
Posts
1,401 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Matrim
-
Boxwoods a little to delicate for tree nails for me so well done for having the patience to draw them. I only used bamboo because of my rather cack-handed way of pulling them..
- 332 replies
-
- Triton
- cross-section
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Things are progressing nicely and I am currently on the 'smart' plans. I wont upload the keel/false keel parts plan as that is quite simple and thus not that exciting. Here though is the smart sheer plan. I have also finally worked out how to get a viewable image out of turbocad. Save as a pdf. Open in pdf reader and screenshot it.. Next week I plan on starting on the framing plan. Joss
-
Excellent quality, up there with John0868.. Joss
- 332 replies
-
- Triton
- cross-section
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
In paper mode how do I get a line with an arrow so I can annotate my plan?? Joss
-
Just a quick update. The plan is redone and faired and I am ready to start (back) on the primary drawings again. Keeping the original plan lines on a hidden layer proved useful in checking the validity of my completed plan as below. Here the new station lines are in blue and the original station lines in black Last time through I started on separate completion plans for each section (i.e frames, keel etc etc) this time I am getting the basics correct on the primary plan and then simplifying to work on each new plan. Here is my working copy of the keel master plan. All I have done so far is copy the information from the main plan and started stripping down the info to what I want to show on the plan. No doubt there will be some adjustments I notice that will need to be mimicked back on the main plan but I should be in a better state to undertake this. Hopefully I will get the smart version of the Keel Master out of the way by next week then can re-do the keel, false keel, stem, bow, keelson individual break out plans. Joss
-
Doing a bunch of treenails can sap your soul. Russ's approach is better but requires some discipline to remember to do so. I tried pulling treenails whilst watching television. You break a few as you are paying less attention but you can get a useable pile done quickly without too much frustration. Joss
-
Looking good, I never had the confidence to use paper and was happy with my 'paste' approach ala John0868 but that in itself caused a need for excessive sanding later so swings and roundabouts really.. Joss
- 332 replies
-
- Triton
- cross-section
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Time for another un-thrilling update! I have just completed drawing in the new waterlines and as an expression of my greater confidence have drawn them at 3ft below the wale and 1.5 ft above (in the original plans I went for 2 ft and 1 ft respectively which just added extra work and did not allow the auto curve CAD functions to work as cleanly as they could). Rather than go into exhaustive detail Wayne's tutorial covers this nicely. I did have to make a couple of leaps of faith though. Which I shall detail here just in case they are invalid leaps. First up when working above the wale towards the rear of the ship you will notice that most plan sets suddenly stop 'bending' the lines to the keel and start sticking straight out as so - Below the wale the waterline should start at the rabbet line. Above the keel this does not exist. Instead I used the handy stern line (here in blue) coupled with one of the rear dotted plan lines from the sheet as my 'start' point above though I am not entirely certain what this relates to - I don't think (what do I know) that this will affect anything later on as other superstructure builds up this. Whatever else you do don't forget and treat this like a station line though as that will really damage your hull shape.. The other area is in the placement of the cap rail. annoyingly enough is not the highest rail on the ship but (at the rear) the following (in the light brown colour) The superstructure above this is not part of the standard framing as can be seen if I switch on my underlying frames trace. In the center of the ship I am using the bottom dotted line. Mainly because again that is where my frame plan frames complete. At the bow I was confronted with more of a conundrum. Here the frames clearly end at the upper rail but when transposing horizontal constructions across the lines completed at the following (note the little horizontal green lines which indicate this point) The lines above this suddenly shoot vertical so looking at my plans I drew a construction from the top of the timberheads where they crossed a station line and then threw a couple of horizontal construction lines off. This appears to match the vertical limit of the body plan lines on the body plan. My problem is that the timberheads (if I remember correctly) were an extension of the frames. So my problem is should I use that line as the cap rail on the sheer or the cap rail as it exists for the majority of the frames. - The timberheads are after all intermittent and do not occur on every frame.. Anyone this stage is fast so if anyone has any criticism of the approach then please say before I get back on to it. Thanks for reading.. Joss
-
Forester is good, O'Brian is better. More realistic, more rounded, more historical, more interesting. I enjoy both but each to his own and it is all subjective to the reader in the end. Let us try and keep the thread on O'Brian and not turn it into a mud-slinging attempt to praise whichever author you randomly prefer. Joss
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.