-
Posts
1,521 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
VonHoldinghausen reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
VonHoldinghausen reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
VonHoldinghausen reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
VonHoldinghausen reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Bateau de Lanvéoc by JacquesCousteau - Scale 1:32 - From Ancre Plans
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sternwheeler From the Susquehanna River's Hard Coal Navy by Keith Black - 1:120 Scale
-
Stavanger reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
dvm27 reacted to a post in a topic: HMS Bellona 1760 by SJSoane - Scale 1:64 - English 74-gun - as designed
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: HMS Cumberland 1774 by Jack H - 1:36 &1:48 - POF - kit development for True Image Models
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Mike Y reacted to a post in a topic: Sloop Speedwell 1752 by Chuck - Ketch Rigged Sloop - POF - prototype build
-
Timmo reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
Speedy reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
Speedy reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
westwood reacted to a post in a topic: Beavers Prize 1777 by Mike Y - 1:48 - POF - Hahn style
-
Pillar production continues. Tenons are milled on one side first and then hand trimmed in places where keelson is at an angle Marking up pillar locations on the keelson is a bit tricky. First I tried to make a plumb bob, but it's not easy on that scale, can't make it heavy enough to stretch the line consistently. So instead I use a carefully aligned gantry to find a vertical line along the side of the beam. A familiar jig has notches to offset the mortise from the side of the beam, and by flipping the gantry around I make sure it is symmetrical. As always, it gets tricky around the edges Now I can cut pillars to final length. Measuring with a caliper and then subtracting the beam thickness ended up unreliable where the keelson is angled, so I made that jig instead. A groove helps with keeping it straight and adds a bit of necessary friction. Once positioned in the mortises - gently press on the beam to compress it to fit. Measure it with a caliper and scribe a line on the pillar, easy Trimming each pillar to final size took a while. I did not dare to mill it directly to the line, so every pillar was slightly oversize (0.3-0.5mm), with hand chiseling and a lot of dry fits. Pink Ivory is very hard to trim with a chisel, takes a lot of force sometimes, and can split on you if you are not careful. Got a pretty deep finger cut when trimming these pillars, luckily avoided getting blood on the model But my chisel safety definitely improved afterwards! But it is a very satisfying feeling when finally the pillar sits just right - the beam is not rocking side to side, but also has zero vertical bend no matter how much weight you put on it. I was surprised how flexible the beams are, even if made of boxwood 4.2mm thick! The Admiralty ordered a load test to ensure the correct installation of such a critical element. Test passed with flying colours! 😎 Final result, all the beams are dry fit in their final positions and dimensions. Careful markup and fine tuning paid off - good alignment in both dimensions, no gaps, I am happy! Now I can take time making them pretty - add chamfers, sand and finish. It is a bit of a puzzle how to install them later on. I am planning on gluing them only to the keelson, even before the deck is installed. I hope that pillar tenons would poke right into the beam mortises with ease, I chamfered the edges to simplify it. Keeping them off the model for too long will be risky, I want to use them as height limits when gluing in the carlings that might affect the deck curvature. For now I am too scared to glue anything really, the pile of "completed, but not yet installed" parts just keeps growing
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks for the full description, Alan! Now it all makes sense, will try your method too!
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Alan, I never had any splits with notches for the aft platform, but it was done in pear, maybe boxwood is more prone to it. But it was just me pushing too much I actually enjoy the process of cutting notches! Filing a chamfer sounds more error-prone in some sense, pieces sliding around in a glue instead of being firmly fixed in the notch. Meanwhile I started drafting the lower deck layout. Will build the deck in parallel with the shot locker and other items in the hold. Am I making some obvious mistake? Please ignore the "fore mast is too far forward", it is intentional and a part of the changes that were done by the British. The plans have not indicated any shift in the beam positions, so I am showing like it was done "cheap and easy" way, by just moving the mast two feet forward until it almost hits the next beam. The locations of hatches/gratings, masts and ladder opening are from the plan. Carling and beam arms locations are improvised based on the TFFM.
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Speaking of wood imperfections - I was visiting the Naval Museum in Karlskrona (the naval base city in the South of Sweden). It had a fascinating bit of naval archeology on display - parts of the hull of an Age of Sail ships (1678 and 1717) excavated in the area. I did not realise how massive these timbers are in person! Impossible to convey on a photo, but these knees are a size of an adult human and likely heavier. The famous hull cross-section drawings look much more impressive when you can touch them... Speaking of the wood grain - note some knots and imperfections, as well as a non-ideal grain direction in the knee. Here is the deadwood - also far from the prime cut of a tree. That was the real life, a crude build reality rather than a work of art. Unfortunately knots and grain do not translate well in scale... And here is the rudder next to it: Sorry for the offtopic, just wanted to share. It's not often you get to see such structural pieces are on display, and not yet another salvaged cannon that museums like so much!
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Now back to the pillars! Pink Ivory put my planing jig to the test. It is not easy to work with - burns when sawing, very prone to tearout, one must be very careful with the grain direction at all times. That made it unrealistic to plane multiple blanks in one go without messing up grain the direction. The other downside of that jig is the requirement to keep the plane straight, without rocking it side-to-side (this photo is exaggerated to illustrate the point). But in the absence of a proper thickness sander it gets the job done, cheap and silent I decided to cut real mortise and tenon joints into the pillars, mostly to help myself with the alignment. I doubt I can drill precise holes join them with a pin, and without some mechanical help to ensure alignment - gluing those together without making a crooked mess would be impossible. Mortise would allow for some adjustments in the very end - if I need to move the end of the pillar a tiny bit - I will just shave off one side of the tenon! And you can't imagine how satisfying the dry fit is, it is held nice and tight without any glue! It is hard to make such a tiny mortise deeper than 0.5mm though (due to the angle of the chisel), but it is enough to firmly register the beam in place. To help mark up the mortises I made a small styrene jig. It has a friction fit to the beam, a bit lower than the beam, and scored marks align with the centerline marked on top of the beam: On the underside a square opening is centered around these scored marks, and the chisel fits nicely in it. Not much pressure is required to mark it. But then I overestimated the strength of the beam, cracking it all the way through along the grain imperfection A clumsy builder can break even a boxwood beam! Luckily the crack is quite clean, so should be easy to glue back like it never happened.
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I was trying to imagine the process of marking up the deck inside the hull. Even with carefully prepared notches in the deck clamps it's not an easy work - the downside of Hahn's method is that working deep inside the hull always feels like a surgery, working through an narrow opening on top. So I decided to make my life easier and do it off the model instead Luckily that hull has a very modest tumblehome, so getting it in and out is geometrically possible. Beams are spot glued to boxwood strips and the entire deck would be assembled on them. Later strips would be removed using some alcohol or water. It would require a bit of a cleanup, but much easier overall. It fits perfectly into all notches, very satisfying! Now I can work with it The deck has a very gentle curve along the hull, so I will take care to glue carlings and ledges on the model to avoid loosing that curve.
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Unbelievable! I found Volume 1 in the wild, english version, not used, and it does not cost a fortune - but a list price of a mere $52! For comparison - the only second hand offer I found on Amazon is $1362 😳 It is on the shelf in the Marinmuseum (maritime museum) in Karlskrona. The treasure is there, among other books in the gift shop! I could not believe my eyes. On the official museum website it is listed as ”sold out”: https://www.smtm.se/om-myndigheten/forskning/publikationer/vasa-i And the shop personnel could not find the book in their computer, which made the transaction a bit complicated 😊 But you can try to contact the museum shop directly (their english is most likely very good) - you might persuade them to check the physical stock on the shelves, my picture might even help. There were at least two books there, I bought one, the other one remains, complete with plans and diagrams. If someone was hunting for it for years - do not miss the chance
-
ancre La Belle 1684 by Oliver1973 - 1/36
Mike Y replied to Oliver1973's topic in - Build logs for subjects built 1501 - 1750
Very neat trick! Sounds easier than soldering and bending it, and "wasting material" is a non-issue at this scale -
Modelling ”career” definitely splits on ”before and after getting your first lifting table” 😊
-
Next was the fitting the lower deck beams. Fairly straightforward and the alignment "jig" helped, though awkward to use (need to clamp its parts in a specific sequence, I dropped parts of the contraption into the hull many times, etc). Of course my deck clamps were not perfectly level to begin with, so some notches needed to be cut deeper than necessary to ensure a level deck. A curved Vallorbe file came in really handy to tune the depth of some notches! Once all beams were horizontal - the run of the deck was already quite fair, with only a minor adjustments to be done for a couple of beams. I was worried it would be a never ending process of alignment (fixing one dimension just to re-align the other), but it was not that bad. End result. Note the tiny gaps on the right side, I do not want beams to push into the frames on both ends to prevent any buckling or tilting due to the seasonal wood movement. The gap would be hidden by the inner planking on the right side, while allowing the hull to "breathe" a bit. My mind got carried away with plans for the deck structure, all the carlings and ledges, thinking how I would approach the construction. Marking up in situ? Making some paper template? Add temporary spacers to lift the deck in one "piece"? Use some rubber bands to firmly fix beams in position without drilling pin holes? Oh, right, that comes much later, I only did them to install pillars... I then remarked the true centerline using a string and placed these two test pillars under a beam. To my horror the beams standing on the keelson looked clearly off-center! The centerline string was already removed by that point, so I pulled two strings for a quick illustration. After careful checks the reason was found - the keelson is not perfectly level and is glued slightly tilted, resulting in a skewed pillar if you just place it on top. No big deal, can be easily compensated for. Luckily there is no issue with an off-center keelson or an incorrect hull shape. Always a bit scared of finding some critical mistake done 10 years ago... 🫣
- 954 replies
-
- hahn
- oliver cromwell
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
About us
Modelshipworld - Advancing Ship Modeling through Research
SSL Secured
Your security is important for us so this Website is SSL-Secured
NRG Mailing Address
Nautical Research Guild
237 South Lincoln Street
Westmont IL, 60559-1917
Model Ship World ® and the MSW logo are Registered Trademarks, and belong to the Nautical Research Guild (United States Patent and Trademark Office: No. 6,929,264 & No. 6,929,274, registered Dec. 20, 2022)
Helpful Links
About the NRG
If you enjoy building ship models that are historically accurate as well as beautiful, then The Nautical Research Guild (NRG) is just right for you.
The Guild is a non-profit educational organization whose mission is to “Advance Ship Modeling Through Research”. We provide support to our members in their efforts to raise the quality of their model ships.
The Nautical Research Guild has published our world-renowned quarterly magazine, The Nautical Research Journal, since 1955. The pages of the Journal are full of articles by accomplished ship modelers who show you how they create those exquisite details on their models, and by maritime historians who show you the correct details to build. The Journal is available in both print and digital editions. Go to the NRG web site (www.thenrg.org) to download a complimentary digital copy of the Journal. The NRG also publishes plan sets, books and compilations of back issues of the Journal and the former Ships in Scale and Model Ship Builder magazines.