Jump to content

JerryTodd

NRG Member
  • Posts

    785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JerryTodd

  1. Most of the model's ballast weight will be in a bulb on a fin at the bottom of the boat. The fin slides into a sort of center-board trunk built into the model some years ago, back around post #7 of this log. The fin itself is an aluminum plate measuring about 153mm x 245mm x 4mm. The fin is placed at the hull's center of lateral plane. Last post I used a brute force method to determine the amount of weight the bulb will need to be (25pds/11kg) I intended to sand cast the lead bulb in two halves, but that would require getting the tools and equipment for the job; a pot and burner to melt the lead, a ladle, casting sand, gloves and an apron, etc. Simpler yet, is to cast the lead shot in epoxy, but I would still need a form. Years ago, I would put the lead in some sort of container, like a 35mm film can, or in the case of Constellation a PVC pipe. That's got to be the safest way to handle this without requiring special equipment. Suitable containers that can hold 25 pounds of lead shot aren't readily available, but 3D printing is... So I started making a 3D model ball with inward facing surfaces, pulled and stretched it into a nice symmetrical ellipsoid, and went surfing for how to determine it's volume. I found a great web site that does just that, and played with the numbers till I got a volume of about 60.62 cubic inches, which multiplied by lead's weigh of .41 pounds per cubic inch, gave me 24.9 pounds. I adjusted my 3D model to those dimensions (a=50mm, b=105mm, c=45mm). I built a model of the fin plate as a reference, then cut the bulb into left and right halves, deleting one of them. I copied the remaining half and pasted it over the original, enlarged it, and flipped the surfaced so it was facing outward. The gaps between the two shells were closed up so it was a solid shell about 4mm thick. I built some structure to seat the fin inside the bulb, them cut the completed half shell into halves again, ie, quarters to wind up with 4 identical quarters , two of which will fit the volume of my 3D printer. As I write this, the first two pieces are on the printer with just 4 out of 6 hours left to print; then I'll print the other two quarters. When done, I'll bond two quarters each into a right and left half; fill each half with lead shot; pour in epoxy to solidify everything, then bond the two halves on the fin.
  2. I adjusting the 3D model to Lavery's chart and printed it. It looks more in scale with the hull now, and the details certainly printed better than the first try. The grills pulled a bit during printing where they didn't do that on the previous print, because of how it was oriented in the printer. Some of the details are still a little frail, but they're all there and serviceable. I posted the STL file on Thingiverse though I can't say how well it'll resize to smaller scales. Here it is with a coat of paint, and with Constellation's crew check the fit.
  3. Before putting more details into the stove, I decided to print it and make sure everything would print.... A lot of the details were too fine; the grab-rail, handles, rotisserie sprockets and chain, etc. The charlie-noble, which is a separate part, fit perfectly though I went back to the model an beefed up the details; thickened the rail and handles, thickened bots and straps, rotisserie parts, etc, and for kicks, added an iron texture to make the screen shot look good, though it has nothing to do with printing it. The whole thing seemed a little small to me, and remembering I have a copy of The Arming and Fitting of English Ships of War 1600-1815 by Brian Lavery, which has a great chart of stove dimensions for various gun-rates of ships on page 198 (2006 edition). On that chart, for a 38 gun ship; the stove's body width should be 56 (48) inches; the length 57 (54) inches, and the height to the top of the flat sides is 48 (37) inches. The height to the top of the pyramid duct is 64 inches. The height of the chimney isn't given for ships of less than 80 guns. (The numbers in parens are the measurements given in the MSW drawing attached a couple of posts earlier.) On another note; the book mentions Lamb & Nicholson stoves, but shows no image, diagram, or description of one. Here's a portion of the "Inner Works" of another Lively class frigate, the Bacchate, launched about a year before Macedonian, with the stove outlined in red. The MSW dimensions are a little smaller than the dimensions given by Lavery for a 38, mostly in height. Before printing it again, I'm going to adjust the model and check the height of the chimney on the Macedonian model itself.
  4. I'm only going for "implied" details on this model, and that's almost done. I made the top of the chimney a separate part and will size it to be attached after the stoves and the forecastle's installed. There's a brace for the spit-drive arm to make, and a couple of flanges on the feet, and it'll be pretty much done and ready to take a shot at printing.
  5. I'm still trying to figure Blender out enough to make viny ornaments for the bow of Constellation and Macedonian, but when the frustration gets to be too much, I slip back into Anim8or and work on something my simple mind can handle... This time it's a galley stove for Macedonian. I found decent drawings online, that apparently originated here; and photos of a model from the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich to base my 3D model on. Unlike Constellation, Macedonian will have her gundeck modeled with guns and other details, such as this stove. I looking for source material to base a model on, it seems the same year Macedonian was launched (June 1810), a new stove by Lamb & Nicholson was being fitted into British warships, but I haven't been able to find any drawings or images of a L&N stove to model from. Also, I assume the stove would have been requisitioned some time before the ship's launch, and would therefore more likely be a Brodie type. If someone can show Macedonian got an L&N stove and direct me to drawings of such a thing, I'll gladly model that. So here's my progress after a couple of hours work. All the details will go into the model, but nothing with be "functional," that is doors, lids, chain drive, etc won't open, be removable, or move. It'll barely be visible peering through the gunports or main hatch, but at 1:36 scale, leaving off too many details would be just as noticeable, as I did consider just making a black brick shaped like a stove.
  6. I got a new 3D printer (Elegoo Mars 3) that has more print volume (larger prints), more resolution (better detail), and actually cost less than my original printer did. First thing, I printed a test batch of "draft" screws as above. They printed perfectly, though the model needs some adjustment; the eyes at the bottom needed to be smaller, and the thimble at the top needed to be bigger around, per the photo of the originals. I also had them print standing almost straight-up, meaning more layers, meaning more more time to print - it took about 5 hours to print these because of that. I attached a pair to chainplates and put them on the model to see how much tugging they would stand. They seem to be tough enough, especially once they're all connected by a sheer-pole. The 3D model's updated and I'll print it more one it's side to take less time to print. I enlarged the thimble, reduced the eyes, and thickened the screw a little. I also reshaped the arms a bit. 30 of them printed in 3 hours 20 minutes, and I temporarily put two on the model under tension to see how they hold up.
  7. Finally got a chance to work on a draft of the Constellation's rigging-screws. It will average 2.5" (63mm) long. It won't be "functional" that is they won't be adjustable but rather one solid piece. If a test print works out, the length will be adjusted in the software to account for the different angles the shrouds take up so the tops will level with each other, basically, I'll print a set for each mast, port & starboard.
  8. I was going to slap together a temporary trough to float the model in to determine what the weight the bulb on her fin would need to be, but I'm either up to my neck with other stuff or too worn out to motivate myself through the shop door. I finally put the model in the tub, in which she barely fit, and figured out the bulb will need to be 25 pounds (11kg) to sit about 1/2" below her painted water line. Adding the battery and some lead-shot bean-bags will trim her where I want her for sailing. I'm still up in the air on how to make the bulb; whether to melt and cast the lead, or cast the lead in epoxy. I'm leaning toward the epoxy casting, and have ordered the epoxy to do the job (and to do some other jobs like repair the pram). In either case it will be made in two halves and somewhat "wing" shaped; something like this model's, though Pride's fin is longer, wider? Meanwhile, the masts are back in and I've been playing with the sail controls again. I seized dress hook loops to the winch lines (red arrows) to attach the sheets and figure out how to keep everything neat and untangled.
  9. Some years ago someone scanned the Macedonian figurehead at the US Naval Academy. A reproduction has since been made so the "original" will be kept indoors, and the repop up on the pedestal outside. They somehow found me and offered to 3D print one for my model for a mere $300. Mind you, that's a for a 2 inch tall figure from a job that they were paid to scan by the US Navy, and machine printed. I wouldn't get a file to print my own, just a plastic figure I would no doubt have to alter by hand to fit the model. I declined. I haven't given much thought to the figurehead, until I got my own 3D resin printer. Now years later, I contacted these fellas about getting an STL file, but they hemmed and hawed about not owning the copyright to sell the file, and not knowing who did. I figured the Naval Academy contracted them to scan it, so they must own it if these guys say they don't. Again, I'm in no hurry on this, so I didn't dig any deeper. I check now and then to see if the file will pop up on Thingiverse or somewhere for free, just-in-case, but instead found a nice scan of a bust of Alexander the Great from some museum in Europe. The more I compared this with the Navy's figurehead, the more I wondered why theirs looked like the actor Mike Pollard. It's my opinion that the "original" figurehead was "restored" after the fight with United States and probably a few times more after that by some Yank carpenter with a low opinion of British wood carving, winding up looking like it does. Further, it's alleged the figurehead was mounted on the new frigate built to replace the captured ship, though I've never been able to find anything but a fiddle-head in any image or document. I suppose the original figurehead was much nicer, and respectful of the subject than what we see in Annapolis today, so I'm going with the bust I found online for my model of the frigate. To test this plan, I altered the 3D file to scale it to size, remove it's pedestal, and make the wedge that fits into the notch on the head knee of the ship. The print didn't turn out so good, but it served it's purpose. Once I manage to make the trail-boards, scroll-work, and other details it has to inter-link with, I'll print a better quality version. This is to be a working, sailing, model, and with all that handling, somethings like this is bound to be damaged or lost at some point. The great thing about 3D printing some parts is I can easily replace it if damaged or lost for nearly free - unlike a one-time print for $300, and would have to make a mold from to have any chance at a replacement.
  10. Johann Thank you so much for this thread and sharing your workmanship, talent, and eye for detail with us in your beautiful photography. It makes me very happy when I get a notification in my email that there's another post in this thread with new beautiful images of beautiful details to see.
  11. Except I would be concerned that the stropp mit brassenblock could slip out over the sheet sheave when the yard is braced hard over. Notice it's inside the lift block in the drawing.
  12. I produce wargames of Civil War battles, and that's had me a bit side tracked as well the last 6 or 7 months as I learned how to put them into software so people can play them online. http://uhlangames.us/
  13. Not a lot going on in my shops for months now, at least, not for me; but I did get some equipment for Pride... The real Pride of Baltimore was a wet boat. It wasn't unusual for her decks to be awash in a seaway, and I figure the model will be no different, maybe more-so. To that end I decided to install a bilge-pump. I searched forums, Facebook, YouTube, and anywhere I could think of to get some idea which pump would be best for the job, and all I really learned was while there's a great deal of information on the Internet, a great deal of that is useless. I finally settled on the little impeller pump pictured, which should fit nicely deep in the model's bilges and pump out any excess. I think I'll also use the electronics set-up in the next pic provided by Dan Lewandowski over on the RCGroups forums a few years back.
  14. I've been very busy and haven't done much of anything to any of my models. I managed to do a lot for a lot of other people, and not much for myself (hobby wise). I am officially retired since Frebruary, but don't be fooled into thinking that means you'll have more time for yourself, it seems it means just the opposite. Anyway, a friend got a Mariner 31ketch named Ashlinka, that needed some work, and I've been helping with that. We're about to replace the bowsprit with a new made one, and after that, what's left to do is pretty much cosmetic. I've still been searching for left-handed taps and dies, or even steel screw and nuts, to make the rigging-screws mentioned a while back, with no luck; so I've decided to make them "non-functional" and maybe even 3D print them. If that works out, I can get to some serious rigging. The ketch above is normally kept at a private dock on a creek just off the Chesapeake Bay near Baltimore, which is a great place to take Constellation and Pride of Baltimore out sailing.
  15. The binnacle is placed forward of the wheel so the fellows standing at the wheel can see it. He/they stand aft of the wheel, beside the drum, and look over the wheel, down onto the binnacle. I did find the title "armed privateer" a little odd, as it implies the existence of "unarmed privateers" The Grecian is a very nice subject for a model, not only as a Baltimore Clipper schooner, but for that humpty-dumpty rail.
  16. Crows-feet faded out of style around 1800 or so. The tops were structured differently so they didn't require them any more. Quarter-boat davits were also coming into vogue around that time. Basic hinged straight posts at first, and getting more curved, or "davit" shaped" by the end of the first decade. By 1805 I doubt any of Nelson's ships had crows feet, and most had quarter-boat davits. Do you have access to the "Masting & Rigging of English Ships of War 1625-1860" It's an expensive book, but it's an invaluable source of information.
  17. The thing that ruins model sails for me is the insistence that seams be stitched, because at the usual model scales, the stitching amounts to being cable as big as a man's arm and just looks cartoonish. When you look at photos of sails, what you see and interpret as "seams" are shadows - not stitches.
  18. Like I said, my hulls are wood. I glass the outside to act as a wrap because the wood in in planks with a lot of seams and joints. Coating it will "waterproof" it but it's still wood and it will move, and seams can still open - the cloth helps with that. In the image the glassed hull sat for a long time in the garage with the temperature changes that entails, and a seam opened slightly, cracking the filler putty. The 4oz glass cloth helped retain the hull's integrity.
  19. Most glass models don't LIVE in the water. They don't sit at docks for months on end, so while you may have issues with water intrusion (leaks), you're not looking at osmosis caused blistering and the like as seen on neglected yachts, especially with epoxy. My hulls are wood, covered with glass cloth in Polyester resin, and coated with poly resin inside, they're all over a decade old now and doing fine. My danger is any sort of through-hull like the rudder-post where water can get in to the wood. Any hole under the waterline is made larger, filled with epoxy, then made to size so all the hole exposes is epoxy. On an all-glass hull, that's not an issue, though is is best to coat the inside of any through-hull hole so water can seep into any cloth that didn't get fully saturated during construction - or you can get a blister and de-lamination. All that they were describing sounds like what I've been doing with my friend on his Mariner 32 ketch, grinding blisters; check the hull with meters till it's dry enough to putty the craters; apply three barrier coats, then bottom paint just before we launch. It's back-breaking work for someone in their 60's Was it a waste of time? Well, yeah, and worst, a waste of money, that stuff ain't cheap. But, what's done is done, and it won't hurt the model. Hopefully you'll build more models and will know you don't need to go through all that again. My hulls build logs are linked below...
  20. I've been looking, but haven't found any at all under 3/16" Maybe I can sell some left handed screw eyes to pay for it, if I find some.
  21. Are there left-handed micro taps and dies available - I have some turnbuckles to make.
  22. Me, of course. Vic, I've been digging around the Library of Congress and National Archive sites, since they offer the highest resolution images.
  23. I looked at a lot of period photos of ships with rigging, and I'm still looking, trying to get a handle on what I'm looking at. There's not a lot of clear images of these things, which are usually referred to as rigging-screws. A lot of Navy ships had deadeyes and lanyards, even steam ships built after Constellation. The design of these rigging screws (some people still refer to turnbuckles as rigging screws today) is sort of opposite of what we think of as turnbuckles. Where a turnbuckle usually has a central drum that may be open or closed, and opposite threaded ends with eyes or clevis'; these have forks at opposite ends of a central screw with opposing threads on either end. The ends of the shrouds have round thimbles seized in. In deSimone's painting the doubled part of the shroud, after wrapping the thimble is very short, but in every photo so far, it's normally long, maybe 3 feet, with 4 or 5 seizings. The first pic is a very rough sketch of what I think it is. Next is from a photo of the ship at Portsmouth New Hampshire about 1884. The last is from one of a pair of photos of midshipmen boarding for a summer cruise at Annapolis about 1888 or 1890. So far these are the only photos where I can actually see the things. Now I'm trying to determine how I'm gonna make these things. I need them functional and I'm sure 3D printed ones wouldn't hold up. Plus I think I need a slightly smaller version for the topmast shrouds.
×
×
  • Create New...