Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks again shipaholic. Here is what I did looking at your photos as a guide. Tell me if this is the right process. I served a length of rope with sewing thread. I then folded each end over about 1/2 inch and served that leaving a loop at the end. I then folded the served rope in half around the block and served it tight and down to the previous two separate servings. I then ran several turns of thread through the two small loops to tie the block to the bowsprit. Again comparing mine to your’s I think I have the served section below the block a bit longer than necessary. 

IMG_5526.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Hi Bill

That looks pretty good. The trick is to just try to make it look right compared to photos or diagrams in books. In my experience kit instructions are not a good reference for details

Cheers

Steve

Edited by shipaholic
More added

Current Build: HMB Endeavour 1:51 (Eaglemoss part work)

Previous Builds: USS Constitution (Revell plastic) HMS Victory 1:96 (Corel) HMB Endeavour 1:60 (AL)

Posted

And then there was a bowsprit. A very busy and time consuming bowsprit!  I had some copper tape left over from my Victory build so I used it to make the 6 hoops around the bowsprit. OcCre did not call for it but I used some oak veneer I had to make the woolding hoops around the woolding. Thanks to Shipaholic I tried, and was successful, in serving and worming the heart blocks and deadeyes. OcCre also did not call for an inner gammoning but ATOS showed there was one so I drilled a hole at the top of the stem to fit the inner gammoning and added the extra roll of gammoning cleats. 

IMG_5541.jpeg

IMG_5542.jpeg

IMG_5544.jpeg

IMG_5545.jpeg

IMG_5546.jpeg

IMG_5547.jpeg

IMG_5548.jpeg

IMG_5549.jpeg

IMG_5550.jpeg

IMG_5551.jpeg

Posted

Thanks Ian. I am finding really enjoy building a wood ship. Kind of brings my woodworking experience to play. However I do miss using my airbrush as much as I do on the plastic. On wood I like using wood stain instead of paint so as to not obscure The grain. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

A few updates since my last post. The bowsprit installed along with its two yards. Sling and a parrel were used to hang the yards per AOTS. Started construction of the foremast. As with the bowsprit, there is a great deal of detail. A bit is preformed in the kit but most has to be made. Woolding hoops above and below each of the wooldings is not directed by the instructions but AOTS does shows them so I plan to fabricate them as well. The bottom section of the foremast is dry fitted in the deck. I remove it to continue any work on it. 
 

On a side note I have had a personal revelation. As I continued to work on my previous builds in the past, those I did after joining MSW, I found myself eager to frequently post to MSW showing and explaining my gradual progress. I did/do this to get feedback from you guys. Looked forward to affirmation, constructive criticism, advice, and encouragement. I also did it subconsciously for concern that MSW members would think I may have quit my build if I went a long time without an update. As a result I think I found myself feeling some sort of eagerness to work on a build to complete a task so I had something to post. As I have continued my work on the Endeavour, a build that requires a slow steady hand without rushing, I have taken on a new mindset. There is no need to rush!  Take all the time I need on every little task!  Step back a day or so on each completed task to insure there are no improvements I want to make. This new mindset has created in me an interesting new attitude toward my build. As an example the simple task of tying a few blocks to the mast as shown in the instructions is now approached with the idea that the thread for that task needs to be served first. Little details that I now will not rush past but instead take all the time I need with out concern if getting something posted to MSW. 

IMG_5582.jpeg

IMG_5583.jpeg

IMG_5584.jpeg

IMG_5585.jpeg

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Now that I have returned from a short trip to London I am able to get back to my shipyard. I finished the foremast sections. Not sure if I want to work on the foremast yards next or move on to the mainmast sections. 
 

For future reference, I have a question. I plan to furl all the sails on this build. I know in this arrangement the topsail yard and topgallant sail yard are lowered on the mast. First of all am I correct?  Second, if it is correct how do you determine where to place them on the mast?  I am going to dig into Longridge’s book to see if there is anything about this. 

IMG_6029.jpeg

IMG_6028.jpeg

IMG_6025.jpeg

IMG_6026.jpeg

Posted (edited)

Hi Bill

 

Yes the yards are lowered with the sails furled. On the scale of your model they would sit about 1/4 inch above the mast caps. Disregard the topgallant yards in the first pic, they are sitting on the crosstrees because the topgallant masts have been lowered.

 

Steve

IMG_0244 (800x600).jpg

2988078940_f4066b264b_ko.jpg

HMB_ENDEAVOUR3.jpg

Edited by shipaholic
Extra pics

Current Build: HMB Endeavour 1:51 (Eaglemoss part work)

Previous Builds: USS Constitution (Revell plastic) HMS Victory 1:96 (Corel) HMB Endeavour 1:60 (AL)

Posted (edited)

Steve the photos you sent, especially the third one, really help me understand the placement of the yards when the sails are furled. Thanks again. How the Endeavour looks in that photo is how I plan to rig it for display. Ian I am rereading through all of the help you have given me in the past. I need to again get an understanding of what I do with each of the sail rigging lines when the sails are furled?  

Edited by Bill97
Posted

Interesting modeling decision. I know in the actual construction of these tall ships the yards were shaped to be either hexagon or similar shape near the center. OcCre does not direct the builder to sand the dial rod being used to make the yard to get this shape at the center. Instead it has the builder glue 1mm wood strips around the center of the yard in order to get the hexagon shape. The kit photos, as well as what other builders have done, show this center section stained a different color than the yard. Looking at photos of the replica show the yards one color, not different at the middle. I am thinking that in order to maintain a since of authenticity I should have it all the same color?

IMG_6044.png

IMG_6045.png

Posted

Bill, if you sanded a hexagon into the middle of the dowel yard the hexagon "tips" would be flush with the adjacent round part ie the flat faces would be recessed compared to the adjacent round part of the dowel. This would make the yard weaker in the centre which is nonsense.

 

Adding six strips to make the hexagon is the solution; this way the hexagon area is stronger. That said, I don't like Occre's picture; it looks like the yard has been broken by a cannonball and they've fished "splints" around it. Make it all the same colour. And I'd be tempted to sand the flats thinner than they are, until the centres of the flats are only a little proud of the rounded part.

Posted

Just to add to Ian’s wise words, I would fill and sand the gaps where the flats meet and also blend in the hex at the ends, so that it all looks like one piece of timber. If you look back at your Victory you’ll see that hex centre on the lower yards, and I think the distance across the hexagon is only very slightly larger than the diameter of the yard where it meets the hex.

Kevin

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/ktl_model_shop

 

Current projects:

HMS Victory 1:100 (Heller / Scratch, kind of active, depending on the alignment of the planets)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/23247-hms-victory-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic-with-3d-printed-additions/

 

Cutty Sark 1:96 (More scratch than Revell, parked for now)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/30964-cutty-sark-by-kevin-the-lubber-revell-196

 

Soleil Royal 1:100 (Heller..... and probably some bashing. The one I'm not supposed to be working on yet)

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/36944-le-soleil-royal-by-kevin-the-lubber-heller-1100-plastic/

 

Posted

Thanks Steve. I actually looked at your’s to confirm what I thought to be true. I had not realized until you mentioned it that OcCre has the yards thicker than scale would have them.  Yes that is also true now that I look closer. For comparison what would you estimate the thickness of your foreyard to be?  Of course being a little thicker does prevent me from breaking them accidentally. 
By the way, how are things down your way?  I have only been as far south in Australia as Sydney. Wow! That is a long flight from the USA! Would do it again in a minute!  Loved my time there. 

Posted (edited)

Hi Bill

My fore yard is about 5/16" thick at the centre. When I built mine I enlarged the diagrams in the AOTS to 1:51 scale using a photocopier. You can see my yards and the diagrams on page 16 of my build log.

 

Yes Australia is a great place, and yes a long flight from USA, 14 hours from LA I think, even further to Kentucky. Sydney has the Endeavour replica berthed there at the maritime museum

Edited by shipaholic

Current Build: HMB Endeavour 1:51 (Eaglemoss part work)

Previous Builds: USS Constitution (Revell plastic) HMS Victory 1:96 (Corel) HMB Endeavour 1:60 (AL)

Posted

Based on your recommendations I sanded down the wood strips at the center of the yards and stained them a solid color. Steve my foreyard measure a slightly bigger than your’s. Mine is 6/16” at the center. While I wait for the stain to thoroughly dry so to begin rigging the foreyards I am working on the redundant job of making chain links. OcCre has just a wire wrapped around the deadeye and then runs straight to the side of the hull. I plan to have 3 chain links plus a preventor plate as shown in the AOTS. 

IMG_6069.jpeg

IMG_6070.jpeg

IMG_6073.jpeg

IMG_6072.jpeg

IMG_6067.jpeg

IMG_6068.jpeg

IMG_6071.jpeg

Posted

Made the chain links and blackened them. Have not attacked them to the hull yet. Will do that after I get the correct angle from the line of the shrouds once I start adding them. As I zoom in on my photos I can see I need to tinker a little more with some of the center links to get a tighter fit to wire ends. May even add a touch of solder. May also make and add preventer plates. Still debating that. 

IMG_6074.jpeg

IMG_6077.jpeg

IMG_6076.jpeg

IMG_6075.jpeg

Posted (edited)

I am planning to furl all my sails on this build. In preparation for that I have been curious about what I am to do with each of the sail running rigging lines. I imagine some stay attached to the sail and others are disconnected from the sail. I found this extremely helpful post here on MSW that I think will be my guide. Thanks for your post Tom. 
 

https://modelshipworld.com/topic/27248-furled-sails-rigging/

Edited by Bill97
Posted

Ok here is a topic for discussion I can’t seem to settle on. I understand the frequent answer is “it is your model do what you want”. But the problem is I can’t decide based on my limited experience what is best. I am trying to decide the sequence to follow in building my complete mast with furled sails. I see other builders follow several different sequences all ending in the same final result. Which do you find the best for you?

1.  Place the bottom mast section then its shrouds. Followed by the next section and its’s shrouds, etc?

2.  Place the completed mast and add all the sets of shrouds?

3.  Add the yards to the mast section(s) before they are placed or stacked?
4.  Add the yards after the mast and shrouds are in place. 

5. If sails are to be added (either furled or unfurled), do you set them to the yard before or after the yard is added to the mast?  
 

As I said all of these sequences will ultimately end with the same final result. A ship with masts, yards, and possibly sails. As I am going through the steady process of making all my mast sections and yards (nothing added/placed on the ship yet) I am just curious what your preferred sequence is for putting them together on the ship?
 

Posted

I think the sequence is differs for every model, regarding the scale, the shrouds, etc. My general sequence is to erect the mast, add lower level shrouds, then lower yard with its attached ropes (footropes, parrals), add yardlifts, then attach sails with its ropes. Then next level shrouds, yard, sail up to the top. But this is general practice only, sometimes i have to follow a different path if the scale is too small and better the result if i build the mast separately with sails, then put it into the hull in one piece and attach the standing rigging and running rigging thereafter. My 1:250 Cutty Sark built this latter way, the 1:144 Wasa built by the first method. Both have furled sails. Now i'm following the bottom-to-top mode building the 1:150 Pamir. Please consider that smaller scales tends to have more ropes and details missing, thus easier to build.

Posted

Thanks for your comment Veszett. I am really debating which way to do this. Is your 1:144 Wasa the Airfix?  I built that model and really enjoy the ship’s history. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...