Jump to content

Blue Ensign

NRG Member
  • Posts

    4,286
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Blue Ensign

  1. Not quite Andy, all the lines pass thro' the blocks attached to the forward crosstrees on the Fore Top then thro' the equivalent blocks attached to the aft crosstrees, then down to the deck.

     

    The Main top has only four beneath the top (two each side) attached to the forward crosstrees only, the lines pass thro' the blocks and then directly to the deck.

     

    Well that's how  Chris Watton sees it.

     

    B.E.

  2. Well Andy it depends in part whether you want to follow the kit plans No 7 and 8, or Sections 15.37 or 15.39 in your newly acquired Volume IV.

     

    In terms of the kit plans for the Fore Top there are three block each side of the top both fore and aft to take the Spritsail Topsail braces, and bunt and leechlines. It looks to me that they intend the inner double block to take both the Spritsail and Spritsail topsail braces, the outer single block to take the leechlines, and the middle block to take the bunt lines.

     

    On the Main top they are showing only two blocks beneath the top each side on the forward crosstree only. These appear to be for the Bunt and leechlines which are then carried directly to the deck without passing through a set of aft blocks.

     

    I'll leave you to read the sections in Volume IV and decide which way you want to go.

     

     

    B.E.

     

  3. Good progress Hamilton, I like the approach you are taking.

     

    One thing about that transom piece, they seem to have taken the design across the top directly from that on HMS Victory. Personally I wouldn't use it even if it was in good order.

     

    Making a replacement gives you more scope to tweak the design, and you have a good while yet to think about your approach to  decoration.

     

    Cheers,

     

    B.E.

  4. Phew, that's a relief I had visions of exploding microwaves all over the world.

     

    Did you heat the solution at a particular setting, high, medium or low,?

     

    Interesting about the stablility, 'rubbing off' can present problems when handling even when successfully covered.

     

    I'm using a different brand of blackening to you, I might give the technical guys a ring at Carr's and ask them what they think, it does say on the container that the stuff is 'Toxic by inhalation'

     

    B.E.

  5. It’s a tricky situation Mark, but the fact that you have removed previous decks, and are thinking of replacing the current one indicates to me that perhaps you feel that given the extra commitment and detailing required in a scratch pof build, she and you deserve better. In that case I would go again with a good supply of wider boards to facilitate the planking pattern.
     

    Incidently did Licorne have strakes of heavier top and butt planking along the  outer edges where the guns run in and out.
     

    On the other hand if you have already conceded some simplifications and not much of the Gun deck will be visible, a nicely planked Quarterdeck and Foc’sle will go a long way to easing any feeling of disappointment you may have about the gundeck.
     

    I of course speak only as a hacker of pob kits where one can more readily accept deficiencies and simplifications because it is only the visible that matters, and levels of accuracy have already been conceded.
     

    Look forward with interest to see what you eventually decide.
     

    Regards,
     

    B.E.

  6. Hi Ferit, like Michael (md1400cs) I was alerted to your build when you posted on my Pegasus.
     

    I could almost echo word for word what Michael said, your modifications are of a very high standard. I love the way you have replicated the quite complicated sheer lines on the hull and the magnificent single planking job, no second chances there.

     

    I see you refer to yourself as ‘rookie’, if that be the case I think you have a natural talent for ship modelling.
     

    Great work on the headrails, beautiful flowing lines, a build to watch I think.
     

    Regards,

     

    B.E.

  7. I have this model (unmasted) lying in ordinary, and quietly decaying in the attic for years. I had intentions of modifying the stern and headworks which badly let down the model but the basic hull form is good. Re-working these areas would much improve matters, but would involve some serious scratching. The stick on windows and  garish decoration is tacky, but you get a lot of basic boat for your money. I wasn't impressed by the plastic ships boats.

     

    B.E.

  8. Jason, there are different methods of determining the size of anchor cables depending on who you read.

     

    Lees (Masting and Rigging) gives the proportion 0.62 of the diameter of the maimmast.

     

    Lavery (Arming and Fitting) makes reference to a 17th century basis of 1/2"  of circumference for each foot of the ships beam at midships.

     

    Snake had a beam of 30' 6"  equating to 15.25" circ. = 1.9mm diameter at scale.

     

    In respect of Pegasus with a narrower beam of 26' 10" on this basis the cable would work out at 13.4" circ = to 1.69mm diameter.

    Using the Lees basis of 0.62 of the mainmast diameter (18⅜”) the cable would work out at 11.39" circ = to 1.43mm diameter.

     

    On your photo the smaller 2mm cable looks more appropriate and does tie in with the beam calculation result.

     

    Cheers,

     

    B.E.

     

  9. Nice work on the ships wheel Evan, and the replacement stove cowl looks good, if a little tall in relation to the crew figure, to my eye. what scale height does it work out to?

     

    If I remember correctly those Revell crew  figures work at at around a scale 5' 6" which would make it 7 or 8 feet high. Will be interesting to see how it looks in place on the deck.

     

    Cheers,

     

    M.

×
×
  • Create New...