NRG Photographic Model Ship Competition - All eligible to enter - Reduced memberhsip fee - JULY 31 ENTRY DEADLINE
×
New Banner Ad Sponsor - Epic Engravers - Great plank bending machine (also bends thin metal sheets) and unique engraved coins to label your model displays!
×
chris watton
-
Posts
2,208 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by chris watton
-
Look how wide the deck planks are: -
I'll do that once the masts are in place. One thing I meant to add - after visiting the Victory a few weeks back and taking loads of pics, and seeing details close up, I realise that most kits (and I would have done the same) use planks for the decks that are way too wide. From looking at the upper deck planks, they equate to something like 3mm wide in 64th scale, so 3mm wide tang is what I'll use. I just added some gun port window frames for the ports under the poop - I realised that with the poop/quarterdeck removable bulkheads in place, the cannon wouldn't have been run out (probably..), and perhaps were placed parallel to the bulwarks - also after seeing the real thing, I added hinges for the removable/foldable bulkheads.. A few pics from Portsmouth (It was the only nice day we had last month - a day later we had snow!): Since studying this and other photos, I changed the pillars of the bulkheads to resemble the ones in the pic, and added the bulkhead hinges at the top:
-
I have just stepped the bowsprit and lower masts, just to make sure they fit smoothly through all of the decks - it is then that I realised how big it's going to be.. I have redesigned the 64th scale Prince (which happens to be my favourite ship model), and that, until Victory was the largest model I have done. 1:48 would definitely be too large - I think 64th is the limit for 1st Rates. The length of the Prince hull is only 100mm shorter than Victory at around 965mm (without the bowsprit)
-
Hi Mike, Of course! First planking is 1.5x6mm limewood and second is 1x5 walnut: Second planking: Followed by wales: And while the hull is free from clutter: Chris
- 906 replies
-
- 12
-
-
I don't think the MDF would add too much more to the weight than ply, to be honest, as most parts are not too big or thick - the hull is mostly a very strong but hollow shell. One thing you may be pleased about is the gun port inner linings - they are all laser cut in 1mm ply (No sill on the lower inside edge of the ports, just top and sides) - and all of the gun port lids are laser cut.
-
What a fantastic job! Miles better than my prototype, that's for sure. Very well done. Chris
-
Thank you The length of the hull, from stern to figurehead is 1066mm. With the bowsprit and mizzen boom, it increases to 1582mm, or there about. After working on it for so long, it doesn't look that big anymore.....
-
Thank you Chuck! That means a lot coming from you. I had anticipated finishing this one by June/July - but there is so much to it that for the first time, I have grossly underestimated the development time and looks like this will go on until September at least! I must weigh it when complete...
-
Hi, Yes, it is the same model. It seems to have took an age to get this far due to all of the internal work. I have added PE window frames to the kit version of the area in front of the stove, after my trip to Portsmouth
- 906 replies
-
- 13
-
-
Phew - that looks like my stern! Thanks for that, B.E. Even with a ship as famous as this, there are still many interpretations. For the most part, I have been using Alan McGowen, John Goodwin and John McKay for most of the detail. There are no castings for the stern and side gallery decoration - I was pleased with how the Mercury layered PE decoration came out, so did the same for Victory. This allows me to draw them as good and as accurate as they can be, and they will never change in size or look too thick - and being easier to paint well.
-
I think I have to disagree regarding the stern's appearance... But correct about the stern davits - but perhaps in another 10-20 year's time, further evidence will suggest that Victory did indeed have davits. This is how research seems to ebb and flow, I have noticed....
-
Hi BE. The stern davits are purely optional. (No holes cut into the stern, so leaving them off isn't a problem). It is important to note that if I were to design the stern as per her Trafalgar configuration, the stern would look very different to how it looks today, on the real thing. If I did design the stern as per 1803/05, too many people who don't know what it actually looked like would complain and say it's wrong. Also, I don't buy the built up bulwarks for the forecastle. I have only ever seen these on Victory on paintings of her taken years after Trafalgar, where the artist has incorporated configurations contemporary to the artist, and not of 1803/05 (one famous painting even shows Victory with a later round bow with continuous front bulwarks). With a 'square' forecastle, build up bulwarks does not look right, perhaps looking a little awkward - But that's just my own personal opinion based on many drawings and paintings I have studied over the years. More drawings/paintings than not show stern davits and timberheads at the forecastle, so this is what I include - but as I said, the stern davits are entirely optional.
-
Hi, I am sorry it took so long to re-register - but I have been very busy - plus my internet has been intermittent. Whilst developing and building the Victory prototype, I have made many changes 'on the fly' - sometimes for realism/previous part not quite right to adding more detail - especially the stern windows. I have just completed the boat designs, anchors (100mm long!) and made four new cannon barrel masters - here are some pics: Copper plates laid in two distinct bands: Rudder is very easy to copper.....: Main Channel: Checking the cannon masters: As for release dates for kits, I am sorry, I cannot help. I have as much idea as you, as I only design and develop the kits, and have nothing to do with release strategy.... Chris
- 906 replies
-
- 19
-
Our Emblem ®
